堪萨斯州农民产量风险认知对保护措施采用的影响

IF 1.2 4区 经济学 Q3 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics Pub Date : 2019-05-01 DOI:10.22004/AG.ECON.287986
S. Ramsey, J. Bergtold, Elizabeth Canales, Jeffery R. Williams
{"title":"堪萨斯州农民产量风险认知对保护措施采用的影响","authors":"S. Ramsey, J. Bergtold, Elizabeth Canales, Jeffery R. Williams","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.287986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When considering adoption or intensification of existing conservation practices, farmers have unique, subjective views of the associated risks. These individual risk perceptions could have important implications for conservation adoption or intensification. As a result, traditional policy approaches to encourage conservation agriculture may be inefficient. This study examines conservation adoption, with special consideration given to yield-risk perceptions. We present a conceptual model of perceived yield risk and estimate bivariate probit models using survey data. Results indicate that positive practice perceptions, particularly with respect to soil fertility, and opportunities for on-farm trialing may encourage adoption.","PeriodicalId":54890,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","volume":"44 1","pages":"380-403"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Farmers’ Yield-Risk Perceptions on Conservation Practice Adoption in Kansas\",\"authors\":\"S. Ramsey, J. Bergtold, Elizabeth Canales, Jeffery R. Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.22004/AG.ECON.287986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When considering adoption or intensification of existing conservation practices, farmers have unique, subjective views of the associated risks. These individual risk perceptions could have important implications for conservation adoption or intensification. As a result, traditional policy approaches to encourage conservation agriculture may be inefficient. This study examines conservation adoption, with special consideration given to yield-risk perceptions. We present a conceptual model of perceived yield risk and estimate bivariate probit models using survey data. Results indicate that positive practice perceptions, particularly with respect to soil fertility, and opportunities for on-farm trialing may encourage adoption.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"380-403\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.287986\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.287986","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

在考虑采用或加强现有的保护措施时,农民对相关风险有着独特的主观看法。这些个人风险认知可能对保护措施的采用或强化产生重要影响。因此,鼓励保护性农业的传统政策方法可能效率低下。这项研究考察了保护措施的采用,并特别考虑了收益风险感知。我们提出了一个感知收益风险的概念模型,并使用调查数据估计了双变量概率模型。结果表明,积极的实践观念,特别是在土壤肥力方面,以及农场试验的机会,可能会鼓励采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Farmers’ Yield-Risk Perceptions on Conservation Practice Adoption in Kansas
When considering adoption or intensification of existing conservation practices, farmers have unique, subjective views of the associated risks. These individual risk perceptions could have important implications for conservation adoption or intensification. As a result, traditional policy approaches to encourage conservation agriculture may be inefficient. This study examines conservation adoption, with special consideration given to yield-risk perceptions. We present a conceptual model of perceived yield risk and estimate bivariate probit models using survey data. Results indicate that positive practice perceptions, particularly with respect to soil fertility, and opportunities for on-farm trialing may encourage adoption.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 社会科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics is to publish creative and scholarly economic studies in agriculture, natural resources, and related areas. Manuscripts dealing with the economics of food and agriculture, natural resources and the environment, human resources, and rural development issues are especially encouraged. The Journal provides a forum for topics of interest to those performing economic research as well as to those involved with economic policy and education. Submission of comments on articles previously published in the Journal is welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Learning about Our Vices from Devices: A Model of Individual Learning with an Application to Consumer Food Waste. Replacing Late Calving Beef Cows to Shorten Calving Season On Policy Interventions and Vertical Price Transmission: the Italian Milk Supply Chain Case Origin and Export Basis Interdependencies in Soybeans: A Panel Data Analysis Provision Point Reverse Auction: A New Auction Mechanism with Applications for Conservation Contracts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1