干扰对团队互动的影响:一项探索性的实地研究

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Small Group Research Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1177/10464964211073590
Sanne A. van der Meer, N. Lehmann-Willenbrock, R. Delahaij, A. Homan
{"title":"干扰对团队互动的影响:一项探索性的实地研究","authors":"Sanne A. van der Meer, N. Lehmann-Willenbrock, R. Delahaij, A. Homan","doi":"10.1177/10464964211073590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite their prevalence in daily teamwork, little is known about the influence of intrusions on teams. Therefore, the effect of intrusions on team interaction was investigated, focusing on relational communication. Three different theoretical perspectives regarding team interaction changes in response to a meeting intrusion are discussed. These perspectives were mapped onto fine-grained behavioral data from twelve teams (N = 4,627 sense units) by means of lag sequential analysis. Teams’ use of relational communication changed in several ways in response to the intrusion. While these changes fit best with one perspective (task-focused), several results also align with other perspectives.","PeriodicalId":47912,"journal":{"name":"Small Group Research","volume":"53 1","pages":"644 - 669"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Influence of Intrusions on Team Interaction: An Explorative Field Study\",\"authors\":\"Sanne A. van der Meer, N. Lehmann-Willenbrock, R. Delahaij, A. Homan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10464964211073590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite their prevalence in daily teamwork, little is known about the influence of intrusions on teams. Therefore, the effect of intrusions on team interaction was investigated, focusing on relational communication. Three different theoretical perspectives regarding team interaction changes in response to a meeting intrusion are discussed. These perspectives were mapped onto fine-grained behavioral data from twelve teams (N = 4,627 sense units) by means of lag sequential analysis. Teams’ use of relational communication changed in several ways in response to the intrusion. While these changes fit best with one perspective (task-focused), several results also align with other perspectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Small Group Research\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"644 - 669\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Small Group Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964211073590\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Small Group Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964211073590","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管这些行为在日常团队合作中很普遍,但人们对这些行为对团队的影响知之甚少。因此,本研究以关系沟通为研究对象,研究了干扰对团队互动的影响。讨论了三种不同的理论观点,讨论了团队互动变化对会议入侵的响应。通过滞后序列分析,将这些视角映射到来自12个团队(N = 4,627个感官单位)的细粒度行为数据上。团队对关系通信的使用在响应入侵的几个方面发生了变化。虽然这些变化最适合于一种视角(以任务为中心),但也有一些结果与其他视角一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Influence of Intrusions on Team Interaction: An Explorative Field Study
Despite their prevalence in daily teamwork, little is known about the influence of intrusions on teams. Therefore, the effect of intrusions on team interaction was investigated, focusing on relational communication. Three different theoretical perspectives regarding team interaction changes in response to a meeting intrusion are discussed. These perspectives were mapped onto fine-grained behavioral data from twelve teams (N = 4,627 sense units) by means of lag sequential analysis. Teams’ use of relational communication changed in several ways in response to the intrusion. While these changes fit best with one perspective (task-focused), several results also align with other perspectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.40%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Policy: Small Group Research is an international and interdisciplinary journal presenting research, theoretical advancements, and empirically supported applications with respect to all types of small groups. Through advancing the systematic study of small groups, this journal seeks to increase communication among all who are professionally interested in group phenomena.
期刊最新文献
Group Dynamics in the Metaverse: A Conceptual Framework and First Empirical Insights The Science (and Practice) of Teamwork: A Commentary on Forty Years of Progress… Hybrid Teamwork: What We Know and Where We Can Go From Here A Conceptualization of Mood Influences on Group Judgment and Decision Making: The Key Function of Dominant Cognitive Processing Strategies Virtual Teams: Taking Stock and Moving Forward
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1