术前内镜评估结肠横向扩散肿瘤侵袭深度的临床研究

Xinqi Chen, Jian‐qun Cai, Jie Feng, W. Gong, Qiang Zhang, Wei Zhu, Wen Guo, Z. Han, Ya-li Zhang
{"title":"术前内镜评估结肠横向扩散肿瘤侵袭深度的临床研究","authors":"Xinqi Chen, Jian‐qun Cai, Jie Feng, W. Gong, Qiang Zhang, Wei Zhu, Wen Guo, Z. Han, Ya-li Zhang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-5232.2019.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the diagnostic accuracy of magnifying chromoendoscopy (MCE) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for preoperative endoscopic assessment of the invasion depth of colorectal laterally spreading tumour(LST). \n \n \nMethods \nData of 104 cases of colorectal LST were included. With the final pathological diagnosis as the golden standard, the accuracies of MCE and EUS for preoperative assessment of the invasion depth of colorectal LST were compared. \n \n \nResults \nThe diagnostic accuracies of MCE and EUS for evaluating the invasion depth of LST were 89.4%(93/104) and 73.1%(76/104), respectively(P<0.05). The lesion size and the endoscopist could affect the accuracy of the EUS evaluation(P=0.017, OR=3.561; P=0.035, OR=1.399). The accuracy of EUS seemed to show a downward trend for colorectal LST of larger diameters. \n \n \nConclusion \nBoth MCE and EUS are effective for evaluating the invasion depth of colorectal LST, but the accuracy of MCE may be higher than that of EUS. Large diameter of the lesion and the doctor's experience inadequacy may be the risk factors for the accuracy of EUS. \n \n \nKey words: \nColorectal neoplasms; Endosonography; Program evaluation; Laterally spreading tumor; Magnifying chromoendoscopy","PeriodicalId":10072,"journal":{"name":"中华消化内镜杂志","volume":"36 1","pages":"474-478"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A clinical study of preoperative endoscopic assessment of the invasion depth of colorectal laterally spreading tumor\",\"authors\":\"Xinqi Chen, Jian‐qun Cai, Jie Feng, W. Gong, Qiang Zhang, Wei Zhu, Wen Guo, Z. Han, Ya-li Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-5232.2019.07.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo compare the diagnostic accuracy of magnifying chromoendoscopy (MCE) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for preoperative endoscopic assessment of the invasion depth of colorectal laterally spreading tumour(LST). \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nData of 104 cases of colorectal LST were included. With the final pathological diagnosis as the golden standard, the accuracies of MCE and EUS for preoperative assessment of the invasion depth of colorectal LST were compared. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe diagnostic accuracies of MCE and EUS for evaluating the invasion depth of LST were 89.4%(93/104) and 73.1%(76/104), respectively(P<0.05). The lesion size and the endoscopist could affect the accuracy of the EUS evaluation(P=0.017, OR=3.561; P=0.035, OR=1.399). The accuracy of EUS seemed to show a downward trend for colorectal LST of larger diameters. \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nBoth MCE and EUS are effective for evaluating the invasion depth of colorectal LST, but the accuracy of MCE may be higher than that of EUS. Large diameter of the lesion and the doctor's experience inadequacy may be the risk factors for the accuracy of EUS. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nColorectal neoplasms; Endosonography; Program evaluation; Laterally spreading tumor; Magnifying chromoendoscopy\",\"PeriodicalId\":10072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华消化内镜杂志\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"474-478\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华消化内镜杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-5232.2019.07.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华消化内镜杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-5232.2019.07.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较放大彩色内窥镜(MCE)和内镜超声(EUS)在术前内镜评估结肠横向扩散肿瘤(LST)侵袭深度中的诊断准确性。方法收集104例结直肠LST患者的临床资料。以最终病理诊断为金标准,比较MCE和EUS术前评估结直肠LST侵袭深度的准确性。结果MCE和EUS对LST浸润深度的诊断准确率分别为89.4%(93/104)和73.1%(76/104)(P<0.05)。病变大小和内镜医生可能影响EUS评估的准确性(P=0.017,OR=3.561;P=0.035,OR=1.399)。EUS对大直径结肠直肠LST的准确性似乎呈下降趋势。结论MCE和EUS均能有效评价结直肠癌LST的侵袭深度,但MCE的准确性可能高于EUS。病变直径大和医生经验不足可能是影响EUS准确性的危险因素。关键词:结直肠肿瘤;腔内超声;项目评估;横向扩散肿瘤;放大彩色内窥镜检查
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A clinical study of preoperative endoscopic assessment of the invasion depth of colorectal laterally spreading tumor
Objective To compare the diagnostic accuracy of magnifying chromoendoscopy (MCE) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for preoperative endoscopic assessment of the invasion depth of colorectal laterally spreading tumour(LST). Methods Data of 104 cases of colorectal LST were included. With the final pathological diagnosis as the golden standard, the accuracies of MCE and EUS for preoperative assessment of the invasion depth of colorectal LST were compared. Results The diagnostic accuracies of MCE and EUS for evaluating the invasion depth of LST were 89.4%(93/104) and 73.1%(76/104), respectively(P<0.05). The lesion size and the endoscopist could affect the accuracy of the EUS evaluation(P=0.017, OR=3.561; P=0.035, OR=1.399). The accuracy of EUS seemed to show a downward trend for colorectal LST of larger diameters. Conclusion Both MCE and EUS are effective for evaluating the invasion depth of colorectal LST, but the accuracy of MCE may be higher than that of EUS. Large diameter of the lesion and the doctor's experience inadequacy may be the risk factors for the accuracy of EUS. Key words: Colorectal neoplasms; Endosonography; Program evaluation; Laterally spreading tumor; Magnifying chromoendoscopy
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7555
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy is a high-level medical academic journal specializing in digestive endoscopy, which was renamed Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy in August 1996 from Endoscopy. Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy mainly reports the leading scientific research results of esophagoscopy, gastroscopy, duodenoscopy, choledochoscopy, laparoscopy, colorectoscopy, small enteroscopy, sigmoidoscopy, etc. and the progress of their equipments and technologies at home and abroad, as well as the clinical diagnosis and treatment experience. The main columns are: treatises, abstracts of treatises, clinical reports, technical exchanges, special case reports and endoscopic complications. The target readers are digestive system diseases and digestive endoscopy workers who are engaged in medical treatment, teaching and scientific research. Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy has been indexed by ISTIC, PKU, CSAD, WPRIM.
期刊最新文献
Risk assessment of cirrhosis patients with esophageal and gastric variceal bleeding by three scoring systems Effects of peroral endoscopic myotomy on esophageal motility in patients with achalasia Efficacy of hemostatic powder on preventing delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial Comparison of long-term outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery on treatment of early esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma Clinical, endoscopic and pathological features of early Barrett esophageal adenocarcinoma and its treatment efficacy by endoscopic submucosal dissection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1