以赛亚书10:34和约瑟夫斯的“模棱两可的先知”，贝鲁姆6.312-313（上）

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION Review of Rabbinic Judaism Pub Date : 2018-07-27 DOI:10.1163/15700704-12341341

R. Aus

{"title":"以赛亚书10:34和约瑟夫斯的“模棱两可的先知”，贝鲁姆6.312-313（上）","authors":"R. Aus","doi":"10.1163/15700704-12341341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nOne of the most disputed passages in Josephus is found only late in his account of the Jewish war against Rome, 66–70 CE. After relating numerous phenomena he considered portents of the destruction of Jerusalem with the Temple, he notes two oracles. The first, in Bell. 6.311, has never been traced back to a specific scriptural passage or Judaic tradition. The second, in 6.312–13, is the object of this study, in which I argue that Isa. 10:34 is the biblical verse behind the “ambiguous oracle.”","PeriodicalId":40689,"journal":{"name":"Review of Rabbinic Judaism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/15700704-12341341","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Isaiah 10:34 and the “Ambiguous Oracle” in Josephus, Bellum 6.312–313 (Part One)\",\"authors\":\"R. Aus\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15700704-12341341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nOne of the most disputed passages in Josephus is found only late in his account of the Jewish war against Rome, 66–70 CE. After relating numerous phenomena he considered portents of the destruction of Jerusalem with the Temple, he notes two oracles. The first, in Bell. 6.311, has never been traced back to a specific scriptural passage or Judaic tradition. The second, in 6.312–13, is the object of this study, in which I argue that Isa. 10:34 is the biblical verse behind the “ambiguous oracle.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":40689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Rabbinic Judaism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/15700704-12341341\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Rabbinic Judaism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700704-12341341\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Rabbinic Judaism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700704-12341341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

约瑟夫斯最具争议的段落之一是在他对公元66–70年犹太人对罗马战争的描述中才被发现的。在将许多他认为预示耶路撒冷毁灭的现象与圣殿联系起来之后，他注意到了两个神谕。第一个，在贝尔。6.311，从未追溯到特定的圣经段落或犹太传统。第二个，在6.312-13，是本研究的对象，我在其中认为Isa。10:34是“模棱两可的神谕”背后的圣经诗句

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Isaiah 10:34 and the “Ambiguous Oracle” in Josephus, Bellum 6.312–313 (Part One)

One of the most disputed passages in Josephus is found only late in his account of the Jewish war against Rome, 66–70 CE. After relating numerous phenomena he considered portents of the destruction of Jerusalem with the Temple, he notes two oracles. The first, in Bell. 6.311, has never been traced back to a specific scriptural passage or Judaic tradition. The second, in 6.312–13, is the object of this study, in which I argue that Isa. 10:34 is the biblical verse behind the “ambiguous oracle.”

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊