知识社会行政程序中外部专门知识的机会和风险

Q4 Social Sciences Verwaltung Pub Date : 2018-07-01 DOI:10.3790/verw.51.3.367
Mathias Hong
{"title":"知识社会行政程序中外部专门知识的机会和风险","authors":"Mathias Hong","doi":"10.3790/verw.51.3.367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What are the opportunities and risks of using external expertise in the administrative procedures of the knowledge society? The constitution demands that the state acts according to rational standards. The administration may, therefore, not completely ‘outsource’ the process of gaining the necessary knowledge to private actors, but has to adopt this knowledge as its own – even where it relies on such external expertise. The considerable opportunities that external expertise offers have to be used in a structured and regulated way that contains their significant risks in a manner consistent with the constitutional responsibility for rational administrative action. This requires paying attention not only to the justifications of decisions but also to its production. It requires deepening our important knowledge about the boundaries of knowledge, about ignorance and uncertainty, as well. To face these challenges seems all the more indispensable in times when the idea of knowledge itself is under heavy attack by “post-truth” or “post-factual” political strategies.","PeriodicalId":36848,"journal":{"name":"Verwaltung","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chancen und Risiken externen Sachverstandes in den Verwaltungsverfahren der Wissensgesellschaft\",\"authors\":\"Mathias Hong\",\"doi\":\"10.3790/verw.51.3.367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What are the opportunities and risks of using external expertise in the administrative procedures of the knowledge society? The constitution demands that the state acts according to rational standards. The administration may, therefore, not completely ‘outsource’ the process of gaining the necessary knowledge to private actors, but has to adopt this knowledge as its own – even where it relies on such external expertise. The considerable opportunities that external expertise offers have to be used in a structured and regulated way that contains their significant risks in a manner consistent with the constitutional responsibility for rational administrative action. This requires paying attention not only to the justifications of decisions but also to its production. It requires deepening our important knowledge about the boundaries of knowledge, about ignorance and uncertainty, as well. To face these challenges seems all the more indispensable in times when the idea of knowledge itself is under heavy attack by “post-truth” or “post-factual” political strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Verwaltung\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Verwaltung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3790/verw.51.3.367\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Verwaltung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/verw.51.3.367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在知识社会的行政程序中使用外部专业知识的机会和风险是什么?宪法要求国家按照合理的标准行事。因此,政府可能不会将获得必要知识的过程完全“外包”给私人行为者,而是必须将这些知识作为自己的知识——即使它依赖于这些外部专业知识。必须以结构化和规范的方式利用外部专业知识提供的大量机会,以符合宪法对合理行政行动的责任的方式包含其重大风险。这不仅需要注意决定的正当性,还需要注意其产生。这需要加深我们对知识边界、无知和不确定性的重要认识。在知识观念本身受到“后真相”或“后事实”政治策略的猛烈攻击的时代,面对这些挑战似乎更加不可或缺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chancen und Risiken externen Sachverstandes in den Verwaltungsverfahren der Wissensgesellschaft
What are the opportunities and risks of using external expertise in the administrative procedures of the knowledge society? The constitution demands that the state acts according to rational standards. The administration may, therefore, not completely ‘outsource’ the process of gaining the necessary knowledge to private actors, but has to adopt this knowledge as its own – even where it relies on such external expertise. The considerable opportunities that external expertise offers have to be used in a structured and regulated way that contains their significant risks in a manner consistent with the constitutional responsibility for rational administrative action. This requires paying attention not only to the justifications of decisions but also to its production. It requires deepening our important knowledge about the boundaries of knowledge, about ignorance and uncertainty, as well. To face these challenges seems all the more indispensable in times when the idea of knowledge itself is under heavy attack by “post-truth” or “post-factual” political strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Verwaltung
Verwaltung Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Fluggastdatenspeicherung: Die Zukunft von Vorratsdatenspeicherung und automatisierter Verdachtsgenerierung Das Politische der Gemeinnützigkeit: Das Vereinsrecht zwischen Steuerrecht, Gefahrenabwehr und Antidiskriminierung Die Bedeutung von Handbüchern für die Entwicklung des Öffentlichen Rechts Augmented Reality im öffentlichen Raum Das Standardsetzungsmodell des IT-Sicherheitsrechts im Kontext kritischer Infrastrukturen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1