骨科围手术期预防性使用抗菌药物的干预作用

Hui Liu, Suishan Qiu, Qinai Zhu, Lianfang Xue
{"title":"骨科围手术期预防性使用抗菌药物的干预作用","authors":"Hui Liu, Suishan Qiu, Qinai Zhu, Lianfang Xue","doi":"10.11648/J.IJIDT.20210601.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess the effect of orthopedic perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis intervention by clinical pharmacist. Methods: 1467 hospitalized patients in department of orthopedics with perioperative records in eight months in 2019 were chosen. 597 surgical cases before intervention were sampled as the control group, and 870 surgical records were sampled as intervention group. Investigation and analysis were performed in orthopedic perioperative prophylactic antibiotics. Results: Compared with the control group, the intervention group showed increased rationalities and decreased irrationalities in perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. The unreasonable external use of teicoplanin was significantly decreased, and the postoperative prophylaxis duration was significantly shortened. There were no significant difference in the timing of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis between two groups. Conclusions: After interventions for the preventive use of antibacterial drugs in orthopedic perioperative period, the rational use of antibacterial drugs has been significantly improved, the irrational use of drugs has been improved, and the effect of drug treatment has been improved. However, there is still a gap between the rational use of antibacterial drugs. Further strengthen supervision and management.","PeriodicalId":73792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of infectious disease and therapy","volume":"6 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Intervening Effect of Preventive Use of Antibacterials During the Perioperative Period in Orthopedic Department\",\"authors\":\"Hui Liu, Suishan Qiu, Qinai Zhu, Lianfang Xue\",\"doi\":\"10.11648/J.IJIDT.20210601.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To assess the effect of orthopedic perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis intervention by clinical pharmacist. Methods: 1467 hospitalized patients in department of orthopedics with perioperative records in eight months in 2019 were chosen. 597 surgical cases before intervention were sampled as the control group, and 870 surgical records were sampled as intervention group. Investigation and analysis were performed in orthopedic perioperative prophylactic antibiotics. Results: Compared with the control group, the intervention group showed increased rationalities and decreased irrationalities in perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. The unreasonable external use of teicoplanin was significantly decreased, and the postoperative prophylaxis duration was significantly shortened. There were no significant difference in the timing of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis between two groups. Conclusions: After interventions for the preventive use of antibacterial drugs in orthopedic perioperative period, the rational use of antibacterial drugs has been significantly improved, the irrational use of drugs has been improved, and the effect of drug treatment has been improved. However, there is still a gap between the rational use of antibacterial drugs. Further strengthen supervision and management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of infectious disease and therapy\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of infectious disease and therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IJIDT.20210601.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of infectious disease and therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IJIDT.20210601.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价临床药师对骨科围手术期抗生素预防干预的效果。方法:选取2019年8个月骨科住院有围手术期记录的患者1467例。选取干预前手术病例597例作为对照组,选取870例手术记录作为干预组。对骨科围手术期预防性抗生素使用情况进行调查分析。结果:与对照组比较,干预组围手术期抗生素预防用药的合理性增加,不合理性减少。明显减少了不合理外用替柯planin,术后预防持续时间明显缩短。两组患者围手术期预防使用抗生素的时间差异无统计学意义。结论:骨科围手术期预防性使用抗菌药物干预后,抗菌药物的合理使用情况明显改善,药物不合理使用情况有所改善,药物治疗效果有所提高。然而,抗菌药物的合理使用仍存在差距。进一步加强监督管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Intervening Effect of Preventive Use of Antibacterials During the Perioperative Period in Orthopedic Department
Objective: To assess the effect of orthopedic perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis intervention by clinical pharmacist. Methods: 1467 hospitalized patients in department of orthopedics with perioperative records in eight months in 2019 were chosen. 597 surgical cases before intervention were sampled as the control group, and 870 surgical records were sampled as intervention group. Investigation and analysis were performed in orthopedic perioperative prophylactic antibiotics. Results: Compared with the control group, the intervention group showed increased rationalities and decreased irrationalities in perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. The unreasonable external use of teicoplanin was significantly decreased, and the postoperative prophylaxis duration was significantly shortened. There were no significant difference in the timing of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis between two groups. Conclusions: After interventions for the preventive use of antibacterial drugs in orthopedic perioperative period, the rational use of antibacterial drugs has been significantly improved, the irrational use of drugs has been improved, and the effect of drug treatment has been improved. However, there is still a gap between the rational use of antibacterial drugs. Further strengthen supervision and management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mycobacterial Nucleic Acids Modulate Host Innate Immune Responses. Streptococcus Pharyngitis with Anaerobes Infection Misdiagnosed as Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Infection: A Case Report The Intervening Effect of Preventive Use of Antibacterials During the Perioperative Period in Orthopedic Department Outcome Comparison Between Tocilizumab Alone Vs Tocilizumab Followed by Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG) Group in Critical COVID-19 Disease To What Extent do Social Determinants of Health Modulate Presentation, ITU Admission and Outcomes among Patients with SARS-COV-2 Infection? An Exploration of Household Overcrowding, Air Pollution, Housing Quality, Ethnicity, Comorbidities and Frailty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1