为从业者群体敞开大门

IF 3.5 2区生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY ACS Chemical Biology Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1017/iop.2022.71

Jessica J. Sim

{"title":"为从业者群体敞开大门","authors":"Jessica J. Sim","doi":"10.1017/iop.2022.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whereas Guzzo et al. (2022) describe the perils and potential of open science for practitioner– researchers and practice-oriented research in industrial–organizational (I-O) psychology, this commentary will focus on a related—but often neglected—voice in the conversation on open science: practitioners who are consumers of the research. Although there are benefits to open science for practitioners, the one-sided adoption of open science practices may unwittingly exacerbate the gap between scientists (who develop and test theories) and practitioners (who solve problems in the professional world).","PeriodicalId":11,"journal":{"name":"ACS Chemical Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Holding the door open for the practitioner community\",\"authors\":\"Jessica J. Sim\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/iop.2022.71\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Whereas Guzzo et al. (2022) describe the perils and potential of open science for practitioner– researchers and practice-oriented research in industrial–organizational (I-O) psychology, this commentary will focus on a related—but often neglected—voice in the conversation on open science: practitioners who are consumers of the research. Although there are benefits to open science for practitioners, the one-sided adoption of open science practices may unwittingly exacerbate the gap between scientists (who develop and test theories) and practitioners (who solve problems in the professional world).\",\"PeriodicalId\":11,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Chemical Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Chemical Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2022.71\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Chemical Biology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2022.71","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管Guzzo等人（2022）描述了开放科学对从业者-研究人员以及工业-组织（I-O）心理学中以实践为导向的研究的危险和潜力，但这篇评论将关注开放科学对话中一个相关但往往被忽视的声音：研究消费者的从业者。尽管开放科学对从业者有好处，但片面采用开放科学实践可能会在不知不觉中加剧科学家（开发和测试理论）和从业者（解决专业领域问题）之间的差距。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Holding the door open for the practitioner community

Whereas Guzzo et al. (2022) describe the perils and potential of open science for practitioner– researchers and practice-oriented research in industrial–organizational (I-O) psychology, this commentary will focus on a related—but often neglected—voice in the conversation on open science: practitioners who are consumers of the research. Although there are benefits to open science for practitioners, the one-sided adoption of open science practices may unwittingly exacerbate the gap between scientists (who develop and test theories) and practitioners (who solve problems in the professional world).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

ACS Chemical Biology 生物-生化与分子生物学

CiteScore

7.50

自引率

5.00%

发文量

353

审稿时长

3.3 months

期刊介绍： ACS Chemical Biology provides an international forum for the rapid communication of research that broadly embraces the interface between chemistry and biology. The journal also serves as a forum to facilitate the communication between biologists and chemists that will translate into new research opportunities and discoveries. Results will be published in which molecular reasoning has been used to probe questions through in vitro investigations, cell biological methods, or organismic studies. We welcome mechanistic studies on proteins, nucleic acids, sugars, lipids, and nonbiological polymers. The journal serves a large scientific community, exploring cellular function from both chemical and biological perspectives. It is understood that submitted work is based upon original results and has not been published previously.