能源宪章条约对欧洲能源市场的影响

Magdalena Jaś-Nowopolska
{"title":"能源宪章条约对欧洲能源市场的影响","authors":"Magdalena Jaś-Nowopolska","doi":"10.13165/j.icj.2018.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides an overview of the essential features of the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT). Keeping in mind that the European Union needs an efficient and integrated internal energy market, the paper analyses the ECT provisions related to both investment protection and problems of arbitration arising from these provisions. The objective of this article is also to present the most significant recent case law settled under the Energy Charter Treaty. The cases demonstrate the complexity of the problems related to ensuring ECT arbitration. Special attention is paid to the most recent CJEU case (Slovak Republic v. Achmea of 6 March 2018), analysing the investor state arbitration clauses in bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and the implications of this judgment on the energy sector. Although, according to the Vattenfall case, the Achmea case did not affect the jurisdiction of tribunal under the Energy Charter Treaty, this article reflects the challenges that might be expected in the future.","PeriodicalId":32140,"journal":{"name":"International Comparative Jurisprudence","volume":"4 1","pages":"77-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE INFLUENCE OF THE ENERGY CHARTER TREATY ON THE EUROPEAN ENERGY MARKET\",\"authors\":\"Magdalena Jaś-Nowopolska\",\"doi\":\"10.13165/j.icj.2018.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article provides an overview of the essential features of the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT). Keeping in mind that the European Union needs an efficient and integrated internal energy market, the paper analyses the ECT provisions related to both investment protection and problems of arbitration arising from these provisions. The objective of this article is also to present the most significant recent case law settled under the Energy Charter Treaty. The cases demonstrate the complexity of the problems related to ensuring ECT arbitration. Special attention is paid to the most recent CJEU case (Slovak Republic v. Achmea of 6 March 2018), analysing the investor state arbitration clauses in bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and the implications of this judgment on the energy sector. Although, according to the Vattenfall case, the Achmea case did not affect the jurisdiction of tribunal under the Energy Charter Treaty, this article reflects the challenges that might be expected in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Comparative Jurisprudence\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"77-89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Comparative Jurisprudence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13165/j.icj.2018.12.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Comparative Jurisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13165/j.icj.2018.12.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文概述了《能源宪章条约》的基本特点。考虑到欧盟需要一个高效、一体化的内部能源市场,本文分析了与投资保护有关的ECT条款以及这些条款引发的仲裁问题。本条的目的也是介绍根据《能源宪章条约》解决的最重要的最新判例法。这些案例表明了确保ECT仲裁相关问题的复杂性。特别关注最近的CJEU案件(斯洛伐克共和国诉Achmea,2018年3月6日),分析了双边投资条约中的投资者-国家仲裁条款以及该判决对能源部门的影响。尽管根据Vattenfall案,Achmea案没有影响《能源宪章条约》规定的法庭管辖权,但本条反映了未来可能出现的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE INFLUENCE OF THE ENERGY CHARTER TREATY ON THE EUROPEAN ENERGY MARKET
This article provides an overview of the essential features of the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT). Keeping in mind that the European Union needs an efficient and integrated internal energy market, the paper analyses the ECT provisions related to both investment protection and problems of arbitration arising from these provisions. The objective of this article is also to present the most significant recent case law settled under the Energy Charter Treaty. The cases demonstrate the complexity of the problems related to ensuring ECT arbitration. Special attention is paid to the most recent CJEU case (Slovak Republic v. Achmea of 6 March 2018), analysing the investor state arbitration clauses in bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and the implications of this judgment on the energy sector. Although, according to the Vattenfall case, the Achmea case did not affect the jurisdiction of tribunal under the Energy Charter Treaty, this article reflects the challenges that might be expected in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
THE ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF DOMESTIC REFORMS TOWARDS STRENGTHENING THE RULE OF LAW, IN GEORGIA, MOLDOVA, AND UKRAINE THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE: WESTERN AND ISLAMIC PERSPECTIVES SHOULD THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE DEVELOP A POLITICAL QUESTION DOCTRINE CONDITIONS FOR THE BANKRUPTCY OF NATURAL PERSONS: WHICH BALTIC STATE IS THE MOST ATTRACTIVE FOR BANKRUPTCY? WHAT CAN FRANCE LEARN FROM THE CZECH REPUBLIC’S APPROACH TO THE ISSUE OF WEARING (ISLAMIC) RELIGIOUS SYMBOLS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1