模糊目标规划中基于优势可能性和必要性准则的maxmin字典最大化联合方法

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI:10.1504/IJMCDM.2019.10019405
M. G. Iskander
{"title":"模糊目标规划中基于优势可能性和必要性准则的maxmin字典最大化联合方法","authors":"M. G. Iskander","doi":"10.1504/IJMCDM.2019.10019405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a new approach for solving fuzzy goal programming problems is introduced. The coefficients and the aspiration level of each fuzzy goal are considered either trapezoidal or triangular fuzzy numbers. Four dominance criteria (dominance possibility, strict dominance possibility, dominance necessity, and strict dominance necessity) are utilised for comparing the fuzzy numbers. The proposed approach is based on merging the maxmin approach and the lexicographic approach in a two-phase process. The first phase applies the maxmin technique by maximising the minimum achievement degree of the fuzzy goals. The second phase lexicographically maximises the achievement degrees of the fuzzy goals according to their preemptive priorities. This methodology provides the decision maker with the advantage of improving the results of his preemptive priority structure model by initially maximising the lowest achievement of the fuzzy goals, and hence guarantee that the ultimate achievement of any fuzzy goal will never be lower than a specific percentage of the achieved maxmin value. The suggested approach is illustrated by a numerical example.","PeriodicalId":38183,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A joint maxmin-lexicographic maximisation approach in fuzzy goal programming using dominance possibility and necessity criteria\",\"authors\":\"M. G. Iskander\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJMCDM.2019.10019405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, a new approach for solving fuzzy goal programming problems is introduced. The coefficients and the aspiration level of each fuzzy goal are considered either trapezoidal or triangular fuzzy numbers. Four dominance criteria (dominance possibility, strict dominance possibility, dominance necessity, and strict dominance necessity) are utilised for comparing the fuzzy numbers. The proposed approach is based on merging the maxmin approach and the lexicographic approach in a two-phase process. The first phase applies the maxmin technique by maximising the minimum achievement degree of the fuzzy goals. The second phase lexicographically maximises the achievement degrees of the fuzzy goals according to their preemptive priorities. This methodology provides the decision maker with the advantage of improving the results of his preemptive priority structure model by initially maximising the lowest achievement of the fuzzy goals, and hence guarantee that the ultimate achievement of any fuzzy goal will never be lower than a specific percentage of the achieved maxmin value. The suggested approach is illustrated by a numerical example.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMCDM.2019.10019405\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMCDM.2019.10019405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了一种求解模糊目标规划问题的新方法。每个模糊目标的系数和期望水平被认为是梯形或三角形模糊数。利用四个显性标准(显性可能性、严格显性可能性、显性必要性和严格显性必要性)对模糊数进行比较。该方法基于在两阶段过程中合并maxmin方法和字典法。第一阶段通过最大化模糊目标的最小实现度来应用maxmin技术。第二阶段根据模糊目标的优先顺序,字典式地最大化模糊目标的实现程度。该方法为决策者提供了通过最初最大化模糊目标的最低实现来改进其优先权结构模型的结果的优势,并因此保证任何模糊目标的最终实现永远不会低于所实现的maxmin值的特定百分比。数值算例说明了所提出的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A joint maxmin-lexicographic maximisation approach in fuzzy goal programming using dominance possibility and necessity criteria
In this paper, a new approach for solving fuzzy goal programming problems is introduced. The coefficients and the aspiration level of each fuzzy goal are considered either trapezoidal or triangular fuzzy numbers. Four dominance criteria (dominance possibility, strict dominance possibility, dominance necessity, and strict dominance necessity) are utilised for comparing the fuzzy numbers. The proposed approach is based on merging the maxmin approach and the lexicographic approach in a two-phase process. The first phase applies the maxmin technique by maximising the minimum achievement degree of the fuzzy goals. The second phase lexicographically maximises the achievement degrees of the fuzzy goals according to their preemptive priorities. This methodology provides the decision maker with the advantage of improving the results of his preemptive priority structure model by initially maximising the lowest achievement of the fuzzy goals, and hence guarantee that the ultimate achievement of any fuzzy goal will never be lower than a specific percentage of the achieved maxmin value. The suggested approach is illustrated by a numerical example.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making
International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making Business, Management and Accounting-Strategy and Management
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: IJMCDM is a scholarly journal that publishes high quality research contributing to the theory and practice of decision making in ill-structured problems involving multiple criteria, goals and objectives. The journal publishes papers concerning all aspects of multicriteria decision making (MCDM), including theoretical studies, empirical investigations, comparisons and real-world applications. Papers exploring the connections with other disciplines in operations research and management science are particularly welcome. Topics covered include: -Artificial intelligence, evolutionary computation, soft computing in MCDM -Conjoint/performance measurement -Decision making under uncertainty -Disaggregation analysis, preference learning/elicitation -Group decision making, multicriteria games -Multi-attribute utility/value theory -Multi-criteria decision support systems and knowledge-based systems -Multi-objective mathematical programming -Outranking relations theory -Preference modelling -Problem structuring with multiple criteria -Risk analysis/modelling, sensitivity/robustness analysis -Social choice models -Theoretical foundations of MCDM, rough set theory -Innovative applied research in relevant fields
期刊最新文献
Selection of polar vessels using multicriteria and capability-based methods Selection of appropriate age management measures using multicriteria decision making methods with interrelationships A Decision-Making Approach for Open Innovation Model Selection in the Turkish Automotive Industry Development of a Best-Worst Method based MCDM approach for solar power plant location selection: An Application to Tunceli, Turkey A new Matrix Form Genetic Encoding for Balanced, Compact and Connected Sectorization through NSGA-II
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1