葡萄牙《网络犯罪法》(2009年9月15日第109/2009号法律)提供的取证手段

Q3 Social Sciences Comparative Law Review Pub Date : 2019-02-19 DOI:10.12775/CLR.2018.010
D. Nunes
{"title":"葡萄牙《网络犯罪法》(2009年9月15日第109/2009号法律)提供的取证手段","authors":"D. Nunes","doi":"10.12775/CLR.2018.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Portuguese legislator has provided, for the first time, in the Portuguese legal system, means of obtaining evidence specific for Cybercrime in Law no. 109/2009, of September 15, in which Framework Decision no. 2005/222/JHA, of the Council of February 24, concerning attacks against information systems and the Convention on Cybercrime of the Council of Europe were transposed to the Portuguese legal system. While the legislator’s options are considered to be mostly correct, there are some critical issues. In the present Article, the legal regime of these means of obtaining of evidence is critically analyzed.","PeriodicalId":36604,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Means of Obtaining Evidence Provided by the Portuguese Cybercrime Law (Law no. 109/2009 of 15 September 2009)\",\"authors\":\"D. Nunes\",\"doi\":\"10.12775/CLR.2018.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Portuguese legislator has provided, for the first time, in the Portuguese legal system, means of obtaining evidence specific for Cybercrime in Law no. 109/2009, of September 15, in which Framework Decision no. 2005/222/JHA, of the Council of February 24, concerning attacks against information systems and the Convention on Cybercrime of the Council of Europe were transposed to the Portuguese legal system. While the legislator’s options are considered to be mostly correct, there are some critical issues. In the present Article, the legal regime of these means of obtaining of evidence is critically analyzed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Law Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12775/CLR.2018.010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/CLR.2018.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

葡萄牙立法者第一次在葡萄牙法律制度中规定了获取网络犯罪专门证据的方法。9月15日第109/2009号框架决定。2月24日理事会关于攻击信息系统的第2005/222/JHA号决议和欧洲委员会《网络犯罪公约》已转至葡萄牙法律体系。虽然立法者的选择被认为大部分是正确的,但仍存在一些关键问题。本文对这些证据获取手段的法律制度进行了批判性的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Means of Obtaining Evidence Provided by the Portuguese Cybercrime Law (Law no. 109/2009 of 15 September 2009)
The Portuguese legislator has provided, for the first time, in the Portuguese legal system, means of obtaining evidence specific for Cybercrime in Law no. 109/2009, of September 15, in which Framework Decision no. 2005/222/JHA, of the Council of February 24, concerning attacks against information systems and the Convention on Cybercrime of the Council of Europe were transposed to the Portuguese legal system. While the legislator’s options are considered to be mostly correct, there are some critical issues. In the present Article, the legal regime of these means of obtaining of evidence is critically analyzed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Comparative Law Review
Comparative Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Balancing Business Objectives and Shareholders’ Rights in Voluntary Delisting: a Comparative Analysis of Selected Legal Jurisdictions A Comparative Study of Child Pornography Laws in the Republic of Korea and in Thailand against the Background of International Legal Frameworks International Arbitration as an Alternative Method for Settling Administrative Disputes in the Kuwaiti Law Validity of the Arbitration Clause in the International Employment Contract: the Viewpoint of the GCC Countries Protection of the Rights of Workers of Industrial Enterprises by International Humanitarian Law (on the Example of the War in Ukraine)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1