具有企业异质性和横向外商直接投资的重力贸易模型

IF 4.2 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY American Journal of Agricultural Economics Pub Date : 2023-02-26 DOI:10.1111/ajae.12395
Jeff Luckstead, Stephen Devadoss, Xin Zhao
{"title":"具有企业异质性和横向外商直接投资的重力贸易模型","authors":"Jeff Luckstead,&nbsp;Stephen Devadoss,&nbsp;Xin Zhao","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We develop a gravity trade model based on a theoretical analysis of heterogeneous firms that engage in horizontal Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) or exporting. The model allows firms' endogenous choice between exporting or FDI to impact the proportion of exporting firms and subsequently bilateral trade. Based on the theoretical results, we propose a three-stage estimation procedure: First, estimate firm selection into horizontal FDI; second, use predicted probabilities from the first stage in the estimation of firm selection into exporting; and third, use predicted probabilities from the previous two stages in the gravity estimation of bilateral trade. We apply this procedure to the European Union (EU) processed food industry, which engages in worldwide FDI and trade. We estimate a baseline model of a standard gravity equation, a two-stage model without FDI selection, and our proposed three-stage model and quantify bias corrections in the coefficient estimates of the trade friction variables in the baseline and two-stage gravity models. The bias corrections can be large. For instance, the inclusion of the proportion of Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) in the trade-selection equation leads to a sign reversal of the distance coefficient estimate and results in an upward bias correction of <math>\n <mrow>\n <mn>173</mn>\n <mo>%</mo>\n </mrow></math>. The three-stage gravity corrects a downward bias of <math>\n <mrow>\n <mn>31</mn>\n <mo>%</mo>\n </mrow></math> in the coefficient estimate of distance in the baseline but an upward bias of <math>\n <mrow>\n <mn>77</mn>\n <mo>%</mo>\n </mrow></math> in the two-stage method, which indicates that the two-stage method overcorrects the downward bias in the baseline gravity.</p>","PeriodicalId":55537,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"106 1","pages":"206-225"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajae.12395","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gravity trade model with firm heterogeneity and horizontal foreign direct investment\",\"authors\":\"Jeff Luckstead,&nbsp;Stephen Devadoss,&nbsp;Xin Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajae.12395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We develop a gravity trade model based on a theoretical analysis of heterogeneous firms that engage in horizontal Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) or exporting. The model allows firms' endogenous choice between exporting or FDI to impact the proportion of exporting firms and subsequently bilateral trade. Based on the theoretical results, we propose a three-stage estimation procedure: First, estimate firm selection into horizontal FDI; second, use predicted probabilities from the first stage in the estimation of firm selection into exporting; and third, use predicted probabilities from the previous two stages in the gravity estimation of bilateral trade. We apply this procedure to the European Union (EU) processed food industry, which engages in worldwide FDI and trade. We estimate a baseline model of a standard gravity equation, a two-stage model without FDI selection, and our proposed three-stage model and quantify bias corrections in the coefficient estimates of the trade friction variables in the baseline and two-stage gravity models. The bias corrections can be large. For instance, the inclusion of the proportion of Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) in the trade-selection equation leads to a sign reversal of the distance coefficient estimate and results in an upward bias correction of <math>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>173</mn>\\n <mo>%</mo>\\n </mrow></math>. The three-stage gravity corrects a downward bias of <math>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>31</mn>\\n <mo>%</mo>\\n </mrow></math> in the coefficient estimate of distance in the baseline but an upward bias of <math>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>77</mn>\\n <mo>%</mo>\\n </mrow></math> in the two-stage method, which indicates that the two-stage method overcorrects the downward bias in the baseline gravity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Agricultural Economics\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"206-225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajae.12395\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Agricultural Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajae.12395\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajae.12395","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文在对从事横向外国直接投资(FDI)或出口的异质企业进行理论分析的基础上,建立了一个重力贸易模型。该模型允许企业在出口或外国直接投资之间的内生选择影响出口企业的比例,进而影响双边贸易。在此基础上,本文提出了一个三阶段的估算方法:首先,估算企业对横向FDI的选择;第二,将第一阶段的预测概率用于企业选择的出口估计;第三,利用前两个阶段的预测概率对双边贸易进行重力估计。我们将此程序应用于欧盟(EU)加工食品行业,该行业从事全球FDI和贸易。我们估计了一个标准重力方程的基线模型,一个没有FDI选择的两阶段模型,以及我们提出的三阶段模型,并量化了基线和两阶段重力模型中贸易摩擦变量系数估计的偏差修正。偏差修正可能很大。例如,将跨国企业(MNEs)的比例纳入贸易选择方程导致距离系数估计的符号反转,并导致向上偏差修正173%。三级重力法对基线距离系数估计值的向下偏差为31%,而两阶段法对基线距离系数估计值的向上偏差为77%,表明两阶段法对基线重力的向下偏差矫枉过正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gravity trade model with firm heterogeneity and horizontal foreign direct investment

We develop a gravity trade model based on a theoretical analysis of heterogeneous firms that engage in horizontal Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) or exporting. The model allows firms' endogenous choice between exporting or FDI to impact the proportion of exporting firms and subsequently bilateral trade. Based on the theoretical results, we propose a three-stage estimation procedure: First, estimate firm selection into horizontal FDI; second, use predicted probabilities from the first stage in the estimation of firm selection into exporting; and third, use predicted probabilities from the previous two stages in the gravity estimation of bilateral trade. We apply this procedure to the European Union (EU) processed food industry, which engages in worldwide FDI and trade. We estimate a baseline model of a standard gravity equation, a two-stage model without FDI selection, and our proposed three-stage model and quantify bias corrections in the coefficient estimates of the trade friction variables in the baseline and two-stage gravity models. The bias corrections can be large. For instance, the inclusion of the proportion of Multinational Enterprises (MNEs) in the trade-selection equation leads to a sign reversal of the distance coefficient estimate and results in an upward bias correction of 173 % . The three-stage gravity corrects a downward bias of 31 % in the coefficient estimate of distance in the baseline but an upward bias of 77 % in the two-stage method, which indicates that the two-stage method overcorrects the downward bias in the baseline gravity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Agricultural Economics
American Journal of Agricultural Economics 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Agricultural Economics provides a forum for creative and scholarly work on the economics of agriculture and food, natural resources and the environment, and rural and community development throughout the world. Papers should relate to one of these areas, should have a problem orientation, and should demonstrate originality and innovation in analysis, methods, or application. Analyses of problems pertinent to research, extension, and teaching are equally encouraged, as is interdisciplinary research with a significant economic component. Review articles that offer a comprehensive and insightful survey of a relevant subject, consistent with the scope of the Journal as discussed above, will also be considered. All articles published, regardless of their nature, will be held to the same set of scholarly standards.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Integration of the US cannabis market Regulatory decentralization and food safety: evidence from China Issue Information Change in farmer expectations from information surprises in the corn market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1