对过去的惩罚(有时):刑事历史改进的司法视角

IF 0.9 4区 社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Prison Journal Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1177/00328855211029663
Rhys Hester
{"title":"对过去的惩罚(有时):刑事历史改进的司法视角","authors":"Rhys Hester","doi":"10.1177/00328855211029663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior criminal record is routinely cited as one of the primary determinants of sentencing, and the common view is that prior record was a leading factor in non-guidelines jurisdictions going back decades. Yet, recent findings from a non-guidelines state failed to conform to this account. This study uses interviews with judges from a non-guidelines state to understand the role of prior record in sentencing in an unstructured sentencing state. This study also reexamines some of the early sentencing guidelines formation literature and finds some indications that pre-guidelines, prior record was not universally an instrumental predictor of sentence length.","PeriodicalId":47409,"journal":{"name":"Prison Journal","volume":"101 1","pages":"443 - 465"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/00328855211029663","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Punishing for the Past (Sometimes): Judicial Perspectives on Criminal History Enhancements\",\"authors\":\"Rhys Hester\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00328855211029663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Prior criminal record is routinely cited as one of the primary determinants of sentencing, and the common view is that prior record was a leading factor in non-guidelines jurisdictions going back decades. Yet, recent findings from a non-guidelines state failed to conform to this account. This study uses interviews with judges from a non-guidelines state to understand the role of prior record in sentencing in an unstructured sentencing state. This study also reexamines some of the early sentencing guidelines formation literature and finds some indications that pre-guidelines, prior record was not universally an instrumental predictor of sentence length.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prison Journal\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"443 - 465\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/00328855211029663\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prison Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00328855211029663\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prison Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00328855211029663","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

以前的犯罪记录通常被引用为量刑的主要决定因素之一,普遍的观点是,几十年来,在没有指导方针的司法管辖区,以前的犯罪记录是一个主要因素。然而,最近来自一个没有指导方针的州的调查结果却不符合这一说法。本研究通过对非指导性州法官的访谈,了解非结构化量刑状态下,前科在量刑中的作用。本研究还重新审视了一些早期量刑指南形成的文献,并发现一些迹象表明,指南前,先前记录并不普遍是刑期长度的工具预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Punishing for the Past (Sometimes): Judicial Perspectives on Criminal History Enhancements
Prior criminal record is routinely cited as one of the primary determinants of sentencing, and the common view is that prior record was a leading factor in non-guidelines jurisdictions going back decades. Yet, recent findings from a non-guidelines state failed to conform to this account. This study uses interviews with judges from a non-guidelines state to understand the role of prior record in sentencing in an unstructured sentencing state. This study also reexamines some of the early sentencing guidelines formation literature and finds some indications that pre-guidelines, prior record was not universally an instrumental predictor of sentence length.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prison Journal
Prison Journal CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The editorial team"s aim is to establish The Prison Journal as a focal point and the forum of choice for studies, ideas, and discussion of adult and juvenile confinement, treatment interventions, and alternative sanctions.
期刊最新文献
What Do Correctional Leaders Think About Faith-Based Programs? Results From a National Survey Walking an EmotionalTightrope: Examining the Carceral Emotion Culture(s) of Federal Prisons for Women in Canada Deconstructing the Power Dynamics of Prison Research Health-Related Experiences, Needs, and Challenges of Transgender People in Prisons: A Systematic Review When Checking a Box is not Enough: The (Un)Readability of PREA Messaging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1