可持续性转型的民主化:评估环境治理中民主实践的变革潜力

IF 4.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Earth System Governance Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131
Jonathan Pickering , Thomas Hickmann , Karin Bäckstrand , Agni Kalfagianni , Michael Bloomfield , Ayşem Mert , Hedda Ransan-Cooper , Alex Y. Lo
{"title":"可持续性转型的民主化:评估环境治理中民主实践的变革潜力","authors":"Jonathan Pickering ,&nbsp;Thomas Hickmann ,&nbsp;Karin Bäckstrand ,&nbsp;Agni Kalfagianni ,&nbsp;Michael Bloomfield ,&nbsp;Ayşem Mert ,&nbsp;Hedda Ransan-Cooper ,&nbsp;Alex Y. Lo","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Many democracies find it difficult to act swiftly on problems such as climate change and biodiversity loss. This is reflected in long-standing debates in research and policy about whether democratic practices are capable of fostering timely, large-scale transformations towards sustainability. Drawing on an integrative review of scholarly literature from 2011 to early 2021 on sustainability transformations and the democracy-environment nexus, this article synthesises existing research on prospects and pitfalls for democratising sustainability transformations. We advance a new typology for understanding various combinations of democratic/authoritarian practices and of transformations towards/away from sustainability. We then explore the role of democratic practices in accelerating or obstructing five key dimensions of sustainability transformations: institutional, social, economic, technological, and epistemic. Across all dimensions we find substantial evidence that democratic practices can foster transformations towards sustainability, and we conclude by outlining a set of associated policy recommendations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100131"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811621000355/pdfft?md5=5c5b097910ffc28ba2ae7f770aae2908&pid=1-s2.0-S2589811621000355-main.pdf","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Pickering ,&nbsp;Thomas Hickmann ,&nbsp;Karin Bäckstrand ,&nbsp;Agni Kalfagianni ,&nbsp;Michael Bloomfield ,&nbsp;Ayşem Mert ,&nbsp;Hedda Ransan-Cooper ,&nbsp;Alex Y. Lo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Many democracies find it difficult to act swiftly on problems such as climate change and biodiversity loss. This is reflected in long-standing debates in research and policy about whether democratic practices are capable of fostering timely, large-scale transformations towards sustainability. Drawing on an integrative review of scholarly literature from 2011 to early 2021 on sustainability transformations and the democracy-environment nexus, this article synthesises existing research on prospects and pitfalls for democratising sustainability transformations. We advance a new typology for understanding various combinations of democratic/authoritarian practices and of transformations towards/away from sustainability. We then explore the role of democratic practices in accelerating or obstructing five key dimensions of sustainability transformations: institutional, social, economic, technological, and epistemic. Across all dimensions we find substantial evidence that democratic practices can foster transformations towards sustainability, and we conclude by outlining a set of associated policy recommendations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth System Governance\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811621000355/pdfft?md5=5c5b097910ffc28ba2ae7f770aae2908&pid=1-s2.0-S2589811621000355-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth System Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811621000355\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811621000355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

许多民主国家发现很难在气候变化和生物多样性丧失等问题上迅速采取行动。这反映在研究和政策中关于民主实践是否能够促进向可持续性的及时、大规模转变的长期辩论中。通过对2011年至2021年初关于可持续性转型和民主-环境关系的学术文献的综合回顾,本文综合了关于可持续性转型民主化的前景和陷阱的现有研究。我们提出了一种新的类型学来理解民主/专制实践的各种组合,以及向可持续发展/远离可持续发展的转变。然后,我们探讨了民主实践在加速或阻碍可持续性转型的五个关键方面的作用:制度、社会、经济、技术和认知。在所有方面,我们都发现了大量证据,表明民主实践可以促进向可持续性的转变,最后,我们概述了一套相关的政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance

Many democracies find it difficult to act swiftly on problems such as climate change and biodiversity loss. This is reflected in long-standing debates in research and policy about whether democratic practices are capable of fostering timely, large-scale transformations towards sustainability. Drawing on an integrative review of scholarly literature from 2011 to early 2021 on sustainability transformations and the democracy-environment nexus, this article synthesises existing research on prospects and pitfalls for democratising sustainability transformations. We advance a new typology for understanding various combinations of democratic/authoritarian practices and of transformations towards/away from sustainability. We then explore the role of democratic practices in accelerating or obstructing five key dimensions of sustainability transformations: institutional, social, economic, technological, and epistemic. Across all dimensions we find substantial evidence that democratic practices can foster transformations towards sustainability, and we conclude by outlining a set of associated policy recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
Diversifying climate policy advice: Research agenda on the expertise of national climate councils Jurisdictional approaches to sustainable agro-commodity governance: The state of knowledge and future research directions Towards sustainable governance of freshwater sand – A resource regime approach Exploring the rights of nature in freshwater and marine ecosystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1