Advanced myocardial deformation echocardiography for the athlete's heart evaluation: Functional and mechanistic analysis

Introduction

Echocardiographic assessment of the athlete's heart remains challenging because of a phenotypic overlap between reactive physiological adaptation and pathological remodelling. The lower range of normal values of left ventricle systolic ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) in athletes makes it difficult to differentiate changes related to adaptive remodelling or indicative of early cardiomyopathy. This study sought to identify echocardiographic phenotype of endurance athletes using 2D speckle tracking imaging with a multi-layer approach and to define predictive factors of subtle LV systolic dysfunction.

Method

Healthy male athletes who underwent a pre-participation medical evaluation at the University Hospital of Nancy between 2013 and 2020 were included. Clinical and echocardiographic data were compared with healthy men from the STANISLAS cohort. Subtle LV dysfunction was defined as a GLS < 17.5%.

Results

A total of 191 athletes and 161 control subjects were studied. Athletes demonstrated lower LVEF (57.9% vs. 62.6%; P < 0.01) and lower GLS (17.8% vs. 21.1%; P < 0.01). No significant differences were found between athletes with and without subtle LV dysfunction regarding clinical characteristics, structural echocardiographic features, and exercise capacity. Athletes with subtle LV dysfunction exhibited a lower endocardial GLS (18.8% vs. 22.7%; P < 0.02), a lower epicardial GLS (14.0% vs. 16.6%; P < 0.01) and a greater endocardial/epicardial GLS ratio (1.36 vs. 1.32; P < 0.01). No significant difference was found regarding mechanical dispersion (P = 0.46).

Conclusion

The endurance athlete's heart is characterized by a specific myocardial deformation pattern with a greater endocardial/epicardial GLS ratio. Subtle LV dysfunction seems mainly driven by a decreased epicardial GLS and not related to exercise capacity, structural remodelling or mechanical dispersion (Fig. 1).