透过黑暗的玻璃:16世纪末和17世纪英国对波兰立陶宛联盟的代表

A. Kalinowska
{"title":"透过黑暗的玻璃:16世纪末和17世纪英国对波兰立陶宛联盟的代表","authors":"A. Kalinowska","doi":"10.30965/25386565-02501001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses how post-1569 relations between Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania were presented in various written materials produced in Britain in the late-16th and 17th centuries. It analyses both the materials produced by and for the court or professional elites, and widely circulating publications (books and newspapers) which were readily available to the general reading public. It argues that there is strong evidence that British readers were aware of the existence of the Polish-Lithuanian Union, although the union itself was rarely presented either accurately or in any detail. They therefore had a very blurred conception of how it functioned in practice, as can be illustrated, for example, by British authors downplaying or simply denying the fact that after the Union of Lublin Lithuania became a constituent part of the Commonwealth with a status equal to that of Poland. Moreover, few writers and editors considered it necessary to provide readers with a proper explanation of the union’s basic ‘rules of engagement’, or any reflections on how it functioned on an organisational level.","PeriodicalId":39190,"journal":{"name":"Lithuanian historical studies / Lithuanian Institute of History","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Through a Glass Darkly: British Representations of the Polish-Lithuanian Union in the Late-16th and 17th Centuries\",\"authors\":\"A. Kalinowska\",\"doi\":\"10.30965/25386565-02501001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article discusses how post-1569 relations between Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania were presented in various written materials produced in Britain in the late-16th and 17th centuries. It analyses both the materials produced by and for the court or professional elites, and widely circulating publications (books and newspapers) which were readily available to the general reading public. It argues that there is strong evidence that British readers were aware of the existence of the Polish-Lithuanian Union, although the union itself was rarely presented either accurately or in any detail. They therefore had a very blurred conception of how it functioned in practice, as can be illustrated, for example, by British authors downplaying or simply denying the fact that after the Union of Lublin Lithuania became a constituent part of the Commonwealth with a status equal to that of Poland. Moreover, few writers and editors considered it necessary to provide readers with a proper explanation of the union’s basic ‘rules of engagement’, or any reflections on how it functioned on an organisational level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lithuanian historical studies / Lithuanian Institute of History\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lithuanian historical studies / Lithuanian Institute of History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30965/25386565-02501001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lithuanian historical studies / Lithuanian Institute of History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/25386565-02501001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了1569年后波兰和立陶宛大公国之间的关系是如何在16世纪末和17世纪英国生产的各种书面材料中呈现的。它分析了由法院或专业精英制作并为其提供的材料,以及普通读者可以随时获得的广泛传播的出版物(书籍和报纸)。它认为,有强有力的证据表明,英国读者意识到波兰-立陶宛联盟的存在,尽管该联盟本身很少被准确或详细地介绍。因此,他们对立陶宛在实践中的运作有一个非常模糊的概念,例如,英国作者淡化或简单地否认了这样一个事实,即卢布林联盟之后,立陶宛成为英联邦的组成部分,其地位与波兰相当。此外,很少有作家和编辑认为有必要向读者提供对工会基本“参与规则”的适当解释,或对工会如何在组织层面运作的任何反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Through a Glass Darkly: British Representations of the Polish-Lithuanian Union in the Late-16th and 17th Centuries
The article discusses how post-1569 relations between Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania were presented in various written materials produced in Britain in the late-16th and 17th centuries. It analyses both the materials produced by and for the court or professional elites, and widely circulating publications (books and newspapers) which were readily available to the general reading public. It argues that there is strong evidence that British readers were aware of the existence of the Polish-Lithuanian Union, although the union itself was rarely presented either accurately or in any detail. They therefore had a very blurred conception of how it functioned in practice, as can be illustrated, for example, by British authors downplaying or simply denying the fact that after the Union of Lublin Lithuania became a constituent part of the Commonwealth with a status equal to that of Poland. Moreover, few writers and editors considered it necessary to provide readers with a proper explanation of the union’s basic ‘rules of engagement’, or any reflections on how it functioned on an organisational level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vasilijus Safronovas, Klaipėdos miesto istorija, Klaipėda Mažosios Lietuvos istorijos muziejus, 2021. 304 p. ISBN 978-609-9603-21-6 Kamil Frejlich, Pod przysądem horodnictwa wileńskiego. O jurydyce i jej mieszkańcach w XVII wieku, Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, 2022. 336 p. ISBN 978-83-231-4694-0 Silvia Foti, The Nazi’s Granddaughter: How I Discovered my Grandfather was a War Criminal, Washington: Regnery History, 2021. 376 p. ISBN 978- 1684-511-08-2/Silvia Foti, Vėtra Lietaus šalyje: Jono Noreikos anūkės pasakojimas, Vilnius: Kitos knygos, 2022. 344 p. ISBN 978-609-4275-15-9 Larry Wolff, Woodrow Wilson and the Reimagining of Eastern Europe, Stanford University Press, 2020. 304 p. ISBN 978-1503-611-18-4, 978-1503-611-19-1 The Commemoration of the 40th Anniversary of the Kražiai Massacre in Lithuania and Poland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1