PRODIAB:在糖尿病患者中使用患者报告的结果测量的观点

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.deman.2023.100128
Nicolas Naïditch , Coline Hehn , Amine Ounajim , Guy Fagherazzi , Antonia Gasch-Illescas , Ben Braithwaite , Jean-François Thébaut
{"title":"PRODIAB:在糖尿病患者中使用患者报告的结果测量的观点","authors":"Nicolas Naïditch ,&nbsp;Coline Hehn ,&nbsp;Amine Ounajim ,&nbsp;Guy Fagherazzi ,&nbsp;Antonia Gasch-Illescas ,&nbsp;Ben Braithwaite ,&nbsp;Jean-François Thébaut","doi":"10.1016/j.deman.2023.100128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are recognized by health authorities as fundamental and can be evaluated by several questionnaires. The main complexity of evaluating PROMs in People with Diabetes (PwD), be it type 1 (PwT1D) or type 2 (PwT2D), is choosing the right tool (generic or specific) with the right constructs. This study explores the use of PROMs in PwD. The main objective was to compare generic and specific QoL PROMs in a diabetic population. The secondary objective was to assess potential overlaps of assessed constructs in the different PROMs frequently used in diabetes.</p><p>PRODIAB was an online quantitative survey conducted between January and February 2022. The scientific committee selected the following oft-used questionnaires: EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L), Audit of Diabetes Dependent Quality of Life (ADDQOL), Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ), Hospital Anxiety and-Depression Scale (HADS-A; HADS-D) and Patient-Health-Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). All PROMs used were validated in French.</p><p>Responses from 2,796 French PwD were analyzed. Compared to PwT2D, PwT1D reported a better general Quality of Life (QoL) on the EQ-5D-5L index (0.75 vs 0.66; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and a lower specific QoL on the ADDQOL (-2.8 vs -2.5; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Adjusted analysis showed that age was inversely associated with EQ-5D-5L index score (-0.11; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and a positively associated with ADDQOL score (0.14; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). All PROMs were significantly correlated with each other and the HADS-A, HADS-D and PHQ9 (<em>r</em> 0.60 to 0.72) even more so. While principal component analyses suggested that all PROMs measured only one dimension (mental health) (eigenvalue=3.39; first dimension percentage of variance 56.5), adjusted analyses suggested that the EQ-5D-5L is not adequate for assessing the specific impact of diabetes on QoL.</p><p>Our study emphasizes the importance of identifying the constructs assessed by each PROM as well as the target population in order to choose the best-suited questionnaire type with the most appropriate constructs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PRODIAB: Perspectives on the use of patient-reported outcome measures among diabetic patients\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Naïditch ,&nbsp;Coline Hehn ,&nbsp;Amine Ounajim ,&nbsp;Guy Fagherazzi ,&nbsp;Antonia Gasch-Illescas ,&nbsp;Ben Braithwaite ,&nbsp;Jean-François Thébaut\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.deman.2023.100128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are recognized by health authorities as fundamental and can be evaluated by several questionnaires. The main complexity of evaluating PROMs in People with Diabetes (PwD), be it type 1 (PwT1D) or type 2 (PwT2D), is choosing the right tool (generic or specific) with the right constructs. This study explores the use of PROMs in PwD. The main objective was to compare generic and specific QoL PROMs in a diabetic population. The secondary objective was to assess potential overlaps of assessed constructs in the different PROMs frequently used in diabetes.</p><p>PRODIAB was an online quantitative survey conducted between January and February 2022. The scientific committee selected the following oft-used questionnaires: EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L), Audit of Diabetes Dependent Quality of Life (ADDQOL), Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ), Hospital Anxiety and-Depression Scale (HADS-A; HADS-D) and Patient-Health-Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). All PROMs used were validated in French.</p><p>Responses from 2,796 French PwD were analyzed. Compared to PwT2D, PwT1D reported a better general Quality of Life (QoL) on the EQ-5D-5L index (0.75 vs 0.66; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and a lower specific QoL on the ADDQOL (-2.8 vs -2.5; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Adjusted analysis showed that age was inversely associated with EQ-5D-5L index score (-0.11; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and a positively associated with ADDQOL score (0.14; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). All PROMs were significantly correlated with each other and the HADS-A, HADS-D and PHQ9 (<em>r</em> 0.60 to 0.72) even more so. While principal component analyses suggested that all PROMs measured only one dimension (mental health) (eigenvalue=3.39; first dimension percentage of variance 56.5), adjusted analyses suggested that the EQ-5D-5L is not adequate for assessing the specific impact of diabetes on QoL.</p><p>Our study emphasizes the importance of identifying the constructs assessed by each PROM as well as the target population in order to choose the best-suited questionnaire type with the most appropriate constructs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266697062300001X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266697062300001X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

患者报告结果措施(PROMs)被卫生当局认为是基本的,可以通过几个问卷进行评估。评估糖尿病患者(PwD)中prom的主要复杂性,无论是1型(PwT1D)还是2型(PwT2D),是选择正确的工具(通用或特定)与正确的结构。本研究探讨了prom在PwD中的应用。主要目的是比较糖尿病人群的一般性和特异性生活质量问题。次要目的是评估糖尿病中常用的不同PROMs中评估结构的潜在重叠。PRODIAB是一项在线定量调查,于2022年1月至2月进行。科学委员会选择了以下常用问卷:EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L),糖尿病依赖生活质量审计(ADDQOL),治疗负担问卷(TBQ),医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS-A;HADS-D)和患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9)。所有使用的prom均以法语进行验证。我们分析了2796名法国残疾人的回答。与PwT2D相比,PwT1D在EQ-5D-5L指数上的总体生活质量(QoL)更好(0.75 vs 0.66;p & lt;0.001)和较低的ADDQOL特异性生活质量(-2.8 vs -2.5;p & lt;0.001)。校正分析显示,年龄与EQ-5D-5L指数得分呈负相关(-0.11;p & lt;0.001),与ADDQOL评分呈正相关(0.14;p & lt;0.001)。所有PROMs之间的相关性显著,而HADS-A、HADS-D和PHQ9之间的相关性更显著(r = 0.60 ~ 0.72)。主成分分析表明,所有PROMs仅测量一个维度(心理健康)(特征值=3.39;第一个维度方差百分比56.5),调整分析表明EQ-5D-5L不足以评估糖尿病对生活质量的具体影响。我们的研究强调了识别每个PROM评估的结构以及目标人群的重要性,以便选择最适合的问卷类型和最合适的结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PRODIAB: Perspectives on the use of patient-reported outcome measures among diabetic patients

Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are recognized by health authorities as fundamental and can be evaluated by several questionnaires. The main complexity of evaluating PROMs in People with Diabetes (PwD), be it type 1 (PwT1D) or type 2 (PwT2D), is choosing the right tool (generic or specific) with the right constructs. This study explores the use of PROMs in PwD. The main objective was to compare generic and specific QoL PROMs in a diabetic population. The secondary objective was to assess potential overlaps of assessed constructs in the different PROMs frequently used in diabetes.

PRODIAB was an online quantitative survey conducted between January and February 2022. The scientific committee selected the following oft-used questionnaires: EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L), Audit of Diabetes Dependent Quality of Life (ADDQOL), Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ), Hospital Anxiety and-Depression Scale (HADS-A; HADS-D) and Patient-Health-Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). All PROMs used were validated in French.

Responses from 2,796 French PwD were analyzed. Compared to PwT2D, PwT1D reported a better general Quality of Life (QoL) on the EQ-5D-5L index (0.75 vs 0.66; p < 0.001) and a lower specific QoL on the ADDQOL (-2.8 vs -2.5; p < 0.001). Adjusted analysis showed that age was inversely associated with EQ-5D-5L index score (-0.11; p < 0.001) and a positively associated with ADDQOL score (0.14; p < 0.001). All PROMs were significantly correlated with each other and the HADS-A, HADS-D and PHQ9 (r 0.60 to 0.72) even more so. While principal component analyses suggested that all PROMs measured only one dimension (mental health) (eigenvalue=3.39; first dimension percentage of variance 56.5), adjusted analyses suggested that the EQ-5D-5L is not adequate for assessing the specific impact of diabetes on QoL.

Our study emphasizes the importance of identifying the constructs assessed by each PROM as well as the target population in order to choose the best-suited questionnaire type with the most appropriate constructs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Differential Costs of Raising Grandchildren on Older Mother-Adult Child Relations in Black and White Families. Does Resilience Mediate the Relationship Between Negative Self-Image and Psychological Distress in Middle-Aged and Older Gay and Bisexual Men? Intergenerational Relations and Well-being Among Older Middle Eastern/Arab American Immigrants During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Caregiving Appraisals and Emotional Valence: Moderating Effects of Activity Participation. Heterogeneity of provider preferences for HIV Care Coordination Program features: latent class analysis of a discrete choice experiment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1