全球致命武力监测:比较机遇与挑战

IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Homicide Studies Pub Date : 2022-09-28 DOI:10.1177/10887679221121146
B. Rappert, Otto Adang, Jasper De Paepe, Abi Dymond, M. Easton, Thomas Probert
{"title":"全球致命武力监测:比较机遇与挑战","authors":"B. Rappert, Otto Adang, Jasper De Paepe, Abi Dymond, M. Easton, Thomas Probert","doi":"10.1177/10887679221121146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comparison across jurisdictions is one way of assessing the appropriateness of lethal force resulting from the actions of law enforcement agencies. This article sets out a vision for a global use of force monitor that can enable meaningful comparisons between law enforcement agencies. It examines some of the opportunities and challenges associated with developing such a monitor in relation to (i) the legal frameworks in place governing use of lethal force; (ii) how official state agencies record and respond to deaths; and (iii) the contexts for the use of lethal force.","PeriodicalId":51586,"journal":{"name":"Homicide Studies","volume":"27 1","pages":"187 - 203"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Global Lethal Force Monitor: Comparative Opportunities and Challenges\",\"authors\":\"B. Rappert, Otto Adang, Jasper De Paepe, Abi Dymond, M. Easton, Thomas Probert\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10887679221121146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Comparison across jurisdictions is one way of assessing the appropriateness of lethal force resulting from the actions of law enforcement agencies. This article sets out a vision for a global use of force monitor that can enable meaningful comparisons between law enforcement agencies. It examines some of the opportunities and challenges associated with developing such a monitor in relation to (i) the legal frameworks in place governing use of lethal force; (ii) how official state agencies record and respond to deaths; and (iii) the contexts for the use of lethal force.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Homicide Studies\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"187 - 203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Homicide Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10887679221121146\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Homicide Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10887679221121146","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不同司法管辖区之间的比较是评估执法机构行动所产生的致命武力的适当性的一种方式。本文提出了一个全球武力使用监测的愿景,可以在执法机构之间进行有意义的比较。它审查了与发展这种监测有关的一些机遇和挑战,涉及以下方面:一管理使用致命武力的现行法律框架;(ii)官方国家机构如何记录和应对死亡事件;三使用致命武力的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Global Lethal Force Monitor: Comparative Opportunities and Challenges
Comparison across jurisdictions is one way of assessing the appropriateness of lethal force resulting from the actions of law enforcement agencies. This article sets out a vision for a global use of force monitor that can enable meaningful comparisons between law enforcement agencies. It examines some of the opportunities and challenges associated with developing such a monitor in relation to (i) the legal frameworks in place governing use of lethal force; (ii) how official state agencies record and respond to deaths; and (iii) the contexts for the use of lethal force.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Homicide Studies
Homicide Studies CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Homicide Studies is an interdisciplinary, international publication dedicated to the dissemination of empirical research addressing issues pertinent to the study of homicide.
期刊最新文献
Exploring Gender Bias in Homicide Sentencing: An Empirical Study of Russian Court Decisions Using Text Mining The Gay and Trans Panic Defense: Focusing on the Homicides, Not the Court Room Strategy Black Femicides Matter: Conceptualizing the Killings of Black Girls and Women as Structural and Cultural Violence Housing Instability and Homicide: Exploring Variation in Housing Indicators on Homicide and Rates of Urban Crime “La Loca” y “La Victima”: An Analysis of Penalizing Gender Non-Conformity After Death
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1