怎样才能做出错误的决定?来自巴基斯坦卫生部门的定性研究

Mohsin Saeed Khan , Babar Tasneem Shaikh
{"title":"怎样才能做出错误的决定?来自巴基斯坦卫生部门的定性研究","authors":"Mohsin Saeed Khan ,&nbsp;Babar Tasneem Shaikh","doi":"10.1016/j.dialog.2023.100127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pakistan’s health system over the past three decades has experienced social, economic, geopolitical instability, and notwithstanding man-made and natural catastrophes. Since 2001, the health system in Pakistan has undergone three phases of organizational and management reforms and does not have a unified national health policy since then. The aim of this research was to assess the factors behind the decision-making by policy planners in the health system of Pakistan.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An exploratory qualitative study based on grounded theory was designed where in-depth interviews conducted with 20 representatives of the political constituencies, civil bureaucracy, health planners and managers, research and educational institutions, NGOs providing technical support in the health sector, development partners and media.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There leading reason cited was the dearth of leadership in health sector, which is compounded by a range of factors such as “institutional monopoly”, “contextual deterrents”, “power for turf”; “inadequate knowledge”, and “design faults”. Such factors were perceived to have a serious effect on the competencies, roles and responsibilities, use of knowledge for decision making. The behavioral aspects of decision makers include the “mindset,” and “conflicting interests”.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The multitude of factors and complexities within the health sector of Pakistan continue to widen the vacuum in the leadership echelons. Hence, there is a high probability of taking wrong decisions not based on evidence, and resulting in a grossly under-performing health system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72803,"journal":{"name":"Dialogues in health","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What does it take to make a wrong decision? A qualitative study from Pakistan’s health sector\",\"authors\":\"Mohsin Saeed Khan ,&nbsp;Babar Tasneem Shaikh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dialog.2023.100127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pakistan’s health system over the past three decades has experienced social, economic, geopolitical instability, and notwithstanding man-made and natural catastrophes. Since 2001, the health system in Pakistan has undergone three phases of organizational and management reforms and does not have a unified national health policy since then. The aim of this research was to assess the factors behind the decision-making by policy planners in the health system of Pakistan.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An exploratory qualitative study based on grounded theory was designed where in-depth interviews conducted with 20 representatives of the political constituencies, civil bureaucracy, health planners and managers, research and educational institutions, NGOs providing technical support in the health sector, development partners and media.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There leading reason cited was the dearth of leadership in health sector, which is compounded by a range of factors such as “institutional monopoly”, “contextual deterrents”, “power for turf”; “inadequate knowledge”, and “design faults”. Such factors were perceived to have a serious effect on the competencies, roles and responsibilities, use of knowledge for decision making. The behavioral aspects of decision makers include the “mindset,” and “conflicting interests”.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The multitude of factors and complexities within the health sector of Pakistan continue to widen the vacuum in the leadership echelons. Hence, there is a high probability of taking wrong decisions not based on evidence, and resulting in a grossly under-performing health system.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dialogues in health\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dialogues in health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277265332300031X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogues in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277265332300031X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景巴基斯坦的卫生系统在过去三十年中经历了社会、经济、地缘政治的不稳定,尽管发生了人为和自然灾害。自2001年以来,巴基斯坦的卫生系统经历了三个阶段的组织和管理改革,此后没有统一的国家卫生政策。本研究的目的是评估巴基斯坦卫生系统政策规划者决策背后的因素。方法设计了一项基于扎根理论的探索性质的研究,对来自政治选区、文职官僚机构、卫生规划人员和管理人员、研究和教育机构、在卫生部门提供技术支持的非政府组织、发展伙伴和媒体的20名代表进行了深入访谈。结果主要原因是卫生部门缺乏领导能力,再加上“机构垄断”、“背景威慑”、“权力争夺地盘”等一系列因素;“知识不足”和“设计缺陷”。这些因素被认为对能力、作用和责任以及对决策知识的使用有严重影响。决策者的行为方面包括“心态”和“利益冲突”。巴基斯坦卫生部门的众多因素和复杂性继续扩大领导阶层的真空。因此,很有可能在没有证据的情况下做出错误的决定,并导致卫生系统严重表现不佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What does it take to make a wrong decision? A qualitative study from Pakistan’s health sector

Background

Pakistan’s health system over the past three decades has experienced social, economic, geopolitical instability, and notwithstanding man-made and natural catastrophes. Since 2001, the health system in Pakistan has undergone three phases of organizational and management reforms and does not have a unified national health policy since then. The aim of this research was to assess the factors behind the decision-making by policy planners in the health system of Pakistan.

Methods

An exploratory qualitative study based on grounded theory was designed where in-depth interviews conducted with 20 representatives of the political constituencies, civil bureaucracy, health planners and managers, research and educational institutions, NGOs providing technical support in the health sector, development partners and media.

Results

There leading reason cited was the dearth of leadership in health sector, which is compounded by a range of factors such as “institutional monopoly”, “contextual deterrents”, “power for turf”; “inadequate knowledge”, and “design faults”. Such factors were perceived to have a serious effect on the competencies, roles and responsibilities, use of knowledge for decision making. The behavioral aspects of decision makers include the “mindset,” and “conflicting interests”.

Conclusions

The multitude of factors and complexities within the health sector of Pakistan continue to widen the vacuum in the leadership echelons. Hence, there is a high probability of taking wrong decisions not based on evidence, and resulting in a grossly under-performing health system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dialogues in health
Dialogues in health Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
134 days
期刊最新文献
Correlation between fall experience and life functions among community-dwelling older adults in Japan Breaking barriers: A gender-based quota system in nursing school admission in Bangladesh Success rates and adherence to antiretroviral therapy among treatment-naïve patients in Davao City, Philippines: A ten-year retrospective cohort study An overlooked risk for skin health: Less availability and higher cost of sunscreen for people with melanated skin Genomic analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 variants circulated in the Philippines, 2020–2024
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1