{"title":"农村艾滋病毒/艾滋病保健提供者的礼貌羞辱和自我保健做法","authors":"F. Parks, S. Smallwood","doi":"10.1080/15381501.2021.1922116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Stigma by association, or “courtesy stigma,” is defined as public disapproval for associating with a perceived stigmatized group. Using an audience response system (ARS), rural HIV/AIDS healthcare providers (n = 69) were asked about experiences of courtesy stigma and self-care practices for safeguarding their well-being. Qualitative responses were coded and themes identified. Forty-nine percent of respondents reported experiencing courtesy stigma (for example, others assuming they were HIV-positive because of their work). While respondents rated their quality of self-care as either “good” (43.5%) or “excellent” (14.5%), opportunities to increase providers’ capacity to practice quality self-care is strongly encouraged.","PeriodicalId":44452,"journal":{"name":"Journal of HIV-AIDS & Social Services","volume":"20 1","pages":"136 - 143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15381501.2021.1922116","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Courtesy stigma and self-care practices among rural HIV/AIDS healthcare providers\",\"authors\":\"F. Parks, S. Smallwood\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15381501.2021.1922116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Stigma by association, or “courtesy stigma,” is defined as public disapproval for associating with a perceived stigmatized group. Using an audience response system (ARS), rural HIV/AIDS healthcare providers (n = 69) were asked about experiences of courtesy stigma and self-care practices for safeguarding their well-being. Qualitative responses were coded and themes identified. Forty-nine percent of respondents reported experiencing courtesy stigma (for example, others assuming they were HIV-positive because of their work). While respondents rated their quality of self-care as either “good” (43.5%) or “excellent” (14.5%), opportunities to increase providers’ capacity to practice quality self-care is strongly encouraged.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of HIV-AIDS & Social Services\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"136 - 143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15381501.2021.1922116\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of HIV-AIDS & Social Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15381501.2021.1922116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of HIV-AIDS & Social Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15381501.2021.1922116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
Courtesy stigma and self-care practices among rural HIV/AIDS healthcare providers
Abstract Stigma by association, or “courtesy stigma,” is defined as public disapproval for associating with a perceived stigmatized group. Using an audience response system (ARS), rural HIV/AIDS healthcare providers (n = 69) were asked about experiences of courtesy stigma and self-care practices for safeguarding their well-being. Qualitative responses were coded and themes identified. Forty-nine percent of respondents reported experiencing courtesy stigma (for example, others assuming they were HIV-positive because of their work). While respondents rated their quality of self-care as either “good” (43.5%) or “excellent” (14.5%), opportunities to increase providers’ capacity to practice quality self-care is strongly encouraged.