A. Khudoley, N. Sobolev, E. O. Petrov, V. Ershova, Alexander A. Makariev, E. Makarieva, C. Gaina, P. Sobolev
{"title":"俄罗斯巴伦支海三叠系—侏罗系碎屑岩物源调查研究","authors":"A. Khudoley, N. Sobolev, E. O. Petrov, V. Ershova, Alexander A. Makariev, E. Makarieva, C. Gaina, P. Sobolev","doi":"10.1080/11035897.2019.1621372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Combined U–Pb detrital zircon dating of 21 samples, along with whole-rock chemical composition and Sm–Nd isotopic studies of 39 samples of Triassic and Jurassic rocks from Franz Josef Land and wells in the southern part of the Russian (eastern) Barents Sea, were analyzed for a reconnaissance provenance study. The similarity of detrital zircon age distributions was statistically assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K–S) test and points to a common source area for the clastic material of Triassic to Middle Jurassic age. Uralian-age detrital zircons predominate in all samples, with a comparably smaller portion of Caledonian- and Timanian-age detrital zircons. The number of Palaeoproterozoic and Archean grains is very small and becomes significant only in a few Jurassic samples. εNd(t) values gradually decrease from −1.5 to +2.5 in Lower Triassic rocks, to −2.0 to −8.2 in Jurassic rocks, suggesting an increasing influence of ancient metamorphic basement erosion in the younger Jurassic rocks. High Co/Th ratios, suggesting the erosion of mafic rocks, were mainly recorded in Lower Triassic rocks, whereas increasing Th/Sc ratios, suggesting the erosion of felsic rocks, were recorded only in some uppermost Triassic and Jurassic rocks. We identify the Urals and, in addition during the Triassic, the basement of the West Siberian Basin as the main provenance for the studied clastic rocks. By contrast, only a small volume of fine-grained clastic detritus was derived from basement erosion of the East European Craton, which was characterized by a subdued relief during this time.","PeriodicalId":55094,"journal":{"name":"Gff","volume":"141 1","pages":"263 - 271"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/11035897.2019.1621372","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A reconnaissance provenance study of Triassic–Jurassic clastic rocks of the Russian Barents Sea\",\"authors\":\"A. Khudoley, N. Sobolev, E. O. Petrov, V. Ershova, Alexander A. Makariev, E. Makarieva, C. Gaina, P. Sobolev\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/11035897.2019.1621372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Combined U–Pb detrital zircon dating of 21 samples, along with whole-rock chemical composition and Sm–Nd isotopic studies of 39 samples of Triassic and Jurassic rocks from Franz Josef Land and wells in the southern part of the Russian (eastern) Barents Sea, were analyzed for a reconnaissance provenance study. The similarity of detrital zircon age distributions was statistically assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K–S) test and points to a common source area for the clastic material of Triassic to Middle Jurassic age. Uralian-age detrital zircons predominate in all samples, with a comparably smaller portion of Caledonian- and Timanian-age detrital zircons. The number of Palaeoproterozoic and Archean grains is very small and becomes significant only in a few Jurassic samples. εNd(t) values gradually decrease from −1.5 to +2.5 in Lower Triassic rocks, to −2.0 to −8.2 in Jurassic rocks, suggesting an increasing influence of ancient metamorphic basement erosion in the younger Jurassic rocks. High Co/Th ratios, suggesting the erosion of mafic rocks, were mainly recorded in Lower Triassic rocks, whereas increasing Th/Sc ratios, suggesting the erosion of felsic rocks, were recorded only in some uppermost Triassic and Jurassic rocks. We identify the Urals and, in addition during the Triassic, the basement of the West Siberian Basin as the main provenance for the studied clastic rocks. By contrast, only a small volume of fine-grained clastic detritus was derived from basement erosion of the East European Craton, which was characterized by a subdued relief during this time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gff\",\"volume\":\"141 1\",\"pages\":\"263 - 271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/11035897.2019.1621372\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gff\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/11035897.2019.1621372\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gff","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11035897.2019.1621372","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A reconnaissance provenance study of Triassic–Jurassic clastic rocks of the Russian Barents Sea
ABSTRACT Combined U–Pb detrital zircon dating of 21 samples, along with whole-rock chemical composition and Sm–Nd isotopic studies of 39 samples of Triassic and Jurassic rocks from Franz Josef Land and wells in the southern part of the Russian (eastern) Barents Sea, were analyzed for a reconnaissance provenance study. The similarity of detrital zircon age distributions was statistically assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K–S) test and points to a common source area for the clastic material of Triassic to Middle Jurassic age. Uralian-age detrital zircons predominate in all samples, with a comparably smaller portion of Caledonian- and Timanian-age detrital zircons. The number of Palaeoproterozoic and Archean grains is very small and becomes significant only in a few Jurassic samples. εNd(t) values gradually decrease from −1.5 to +2.5 in Lower Triassic rocks, to −2.0 to −8.2 in Jurassic rocks, suggesting an increasing influence of ancient metamorphic basement erosion in the younger Jurassic rocks. High Co/Th ratios, suggesting the erosion of mafic rocks, were mainly recorded in Lower Triassic rocks, whereas increasing Th/Sc ratios, suggesting the erosion of felsic rocks, were recorded only in some uppermost Triassic and Jurassic rocks. We identify the Urals and, in addition during the Triassic, the basement of the West Siberian Basin as the main provenance for the studied clastic rocks. By contrast, only a small volume of fine-grained clastic detritus was derived from basement erosion of the East European Craton, which was characterized by a subdued relief during this time.
期刊介绍:
GFF is the journal of the Geological Society of Sweden. It is an international scientific journal that publishes papers in English covering the whole field of geology and palaeontology, i.e. petrology, mineralogy, stratigraphy, systematic palaeontology, palaeogeography, historical geology and Quaternary geology. Systematic descriptions of fossils, minerals and rocks are an important part of GFF''s publishing record. Papers on regional or local geology should deal with Balto-Scandian or Northern European geology, or with geologically related areas. Papers on geophysics, geochemistry, biogeochemistry, climatology and hydrology should have a geological context. Descriptions of new methods (analytical, instrumental or numerical), should be relevant to the broad scope of the journal. Review articles are welcome, and may be solicited occasionally. Thematic issues are also possible.