LGBQ+家庭在儿童媒体中的表现

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Journal of Children and Media Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17482798.2023.2173856
Allyson L. Snyder, J. A. Bonus, Drew P. Cingel
{"title":"LGBQ+家庭在儿童媒体中的表现","authors":"Allyson L. Snyder, J. A. Bonus, Drew P. Cingel","doi":"10.1080/17482798.2023.2173856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Representations of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer (LGBQ+) characters in children’s media have proliferated over the last five years (GLAAD Media Institute, 2019). In large part, this shift has occurred because attitudes toward LGBQ+ individuals have substantially improved among the general public, thus incentivizing content creators to diversify their representations (GLAAD Media Institute, 2020). Most LGBQ+ characters, however, have appeared in programs targeted to older children (i.e., ages 7 and older), with relatively few appearing in programs targeted to younger children (i.e., ages 3 to 6). This discrepancy likely stems from the fact that these programs typically depict ageappropriate romances among same-sex characters (e.g., crushes or dating). Although these stories allow older LGBQ+ children to see themselves represented on screen, they are less socially meaningful for younger children. It is possible, however, to include socially relevant LGBQ+ representations in media for young children by focusing on diverse families. Family diversity varies across dimensions of race, socioeconomic status, gender, and family structure (Fine et al., 2000). Here, we focus on diverse family structure, such as a child who has two fathers or a child who has a mother that remains single because she is aromantic. In this commentary, we consider the theoretical importance of LGBQ+ representations in young children’s media, review the current state of these representations, and provide recommendations for researchers and practitioners.","PeriodicalId":46908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Children and Media","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Representations of LGBQ+ families in young children’s media\",\"authors\":\"Allyson L. Snyder, J. A. Bonus, Drew P. Cingel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17482798.2023.2173856\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Representations of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer (LGBQ+) characters in children’s media have proliferated over the last five years (GLAAD Media Institute, 2019). In large part, this shift has occurred because attitudes toward LGBQ+ individuals have substantially improved among the general public, thus incentivizing content creators to diversify their representations (GLAAD Media Institute, 2020). Most LGBQ+ characters, however, have appeared in programs targeted to older children (i.e., ages 7 and older), with relatively few appearing in programs targeted to younger children (i.e., ages 3 to 6). This discrepancy likely stems from the fact that these programs typically depict ageappropriate romances among same-sex characters (e.g., crushes or dating). Although these stories allow older LGBQ+ children to see themselves represented on screen, they are less socially meaningful for younger children. It is possible, however, to include socially relevant LGBQ+ representations in media for young children by focusing on diverse families. Family diversity varies across dimensions of race, socioeconomic status, gender, and family structure (Fine et al., 2000). Here, we focus on diverse family structure, such as a child who has two fathers or a child who has a mother that remains single because she is aromantic. In this commentary, we consider the theoretical importance of LGBQ+ representations in young children’s media, review the current state of these representations, and provide recommendations for researchers and practitioners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Children and Media\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Children and Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2023.2173856\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Children and Media","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2023.2173856","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去五年中,女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和酷儿(LGBQ+)角色在儿童媒体中的表现激增(GLAAD媒体研究所,2019)。在很大程度上,这种转变的发生是因为公众对LGBQ+个人的态度有了实质性的改善,从而激励内容创作者使他们的表现多样化(GLAAD媒体研究所,2020)。然而,大多数LGBQ+角色都出现在针对年龄较大儿童(即7岁及以上)的节目中,而针对年龄较小儿童(即3至6岁)的节目则相对较少。这种差异可能源于这样一个事实,即这些节目通常描述同性角色之间的适龄恋情(例如,迷恋或约会)。尽管这些故事让年龄较大的LGBQ+儿童能够在屏幕上看到自己的形象,但对年龄较小的儿童来说,它们的社会意义较小。然而,通过关注不同的家庭,可以在媒体上为幼儿提供与社会相关的LGBQ+代表。家庭多样性因种族、社会经济地位、性别和家庭结构而异(Fine等人,2000年)。在这里,我们关注的是不同的家庭结构,比如一个有两个父亲的孩子,或者一个有一个母亲因为aromantic而保持单身的孩子。在这篇评论中,我们考虑了LGBQ+表征在幼儿媒体中的理论重要性,回顾了这些表征的现状,并为研究人员和从业者提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Representations of LGBQ+ families in young children’s media
Representations of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer (LGBQ+) characters in children’s media have proliferated over the last five years (GLAAD Media Institute, 2019). In large part, this shift has occurred because attitudes toward LGBQ+ individuals have substantially improved among the general public, thus incentivizing content creators to diversify their representations (GLAAD Media Institute, 2020). Most LGBQ+ characters, however, have appeared in programs targeted to older children (i.e., ages 7 and older), with relatively few appearing in programs targeted to younger children (i.e., ages 3 to 6). This discrepancy likely stems from the fact that these programs typically depict ageappropriate romances among same-sex characters (e.g., crushes or dating). Although these stories allow older LGBQ+ children to see themselves represented on screen, they are less socially meaningful for younger children. It is possible, however, to include socially relevant LGBQ+ representations in media for young children by focusing on diverse families. Family diversity varies across dimensions of race, socioeconomic status, gender, and family structure (Fine et al., 2000). Here, we focus on diverse family structure, such as a child who has two fathers or a child who has a mother that remains single because she is aromantic. In this commentary, we consider the theoretical importance of LGBQ+ representations in young children’s media, review the current state of these representations, and provide recommendations for researchers and practitioners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
How do Canadian parents evaluate numeracy content in math apps for young children? Increased diversity, increased (dis)approval? Measuring parental attitudes towards LGBTQ characters in Flemish children’s television Longitudinal relations of screen time duration and content with executive function difficulties in South Korean children U.S. tweens’ reactions to unboxing videos: Effects of sponsorship disclosure and advertising training Current state of play: Children’s learning in the context of digital games
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1