通过减少暴力的案例研究探讨刑事司法政策的转移模式和流动性

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Criminology & Criminal Justice Pub Date : 2021-02-08 DOI:10.1177/1748895821991607
William Graham, A. Robertson
{"title":"通过减少暴力的案例研究探讨刑事司法政策的转移模式和流动性","authors":"William Graham, A. Robertson","doi":"10.1177/1748895821991607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although there is growing interest in criminal justice policy transfer, a dearth of empirical research in this area has been acknowledged. This article addresses this gap by presenting the results of research conducted on a case of policy transfer of a criminal justice programme, focused on group/gang violence reduction, from America to Scotland. Policy transfer models were used to develop, frame and conduct the analysis of what was considered a ‘successful’ programme transfer; however, it was found that no single model could fully account conceptually for a key finding of the research, namely a policy transfer ‘backflow’. This article details the key processes, mechanisms and outcomes of the policy transfer and in doing so reflects on the usefulness of orthodox and non-orthodox/social-constructionist policy transfer approaches in understanding the outcomes of this case of criminal justice programme transfer.","PeriodicalId":47217,"journal":{"name":"Criminology & Criminal Justice","volume":"22 1","pages":"423 - 441"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1748895821991607","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring criminal justice policy transfer models and mobilities using a case study of violence reduction\",\"authors\":\"William Graham, A. Robertson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1748895821991607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although there is growing interest in criminal justice policy transfer, a dearth of empirical research in this area has been acknowledged. This article addresses this gap by presenting the results of research conducted on a case of policy transfer of a criminal justice programme, focused on group/gang violence reduction, from America to Scotland. Policy transfer models were used to develop, frame and conduct the analysis of what was considered a ‘successful’ programme transfer; however, it was found that no single model could fully account conceptually for a key finding of the research, namely a policy transfer ‘backflow’. This article details the key processes, mechanisms and outcomes of the policy transfer and in doing so reflects on the usefulness of orthodox and non-orthodox/social-constructionist policy transfer approaches in understanding the outcomes of this case of criminal justice programme transfer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Criminology & Criminal Justice\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"423 - 441\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1748895821991607\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Criminology & Criminal Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895821991607\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminology & Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895821991607","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

虽然人们对刑事司法政策转移的兴趣越来越大,但人们承认,这方面的实证研究缺乏。本文通过介绍对刑事司法方案(侧重于减少团体/帮派暴力)从美国到苏格兰的政策转移案例的研究结果,解决了这一差距。政策转移模型被用来制定、构建和分析什么是“成功的”方案转移;然而,研究发现,没有一个单一的模型可以在概念上完全解释研究的一个关键发现,即政策转移“回流”。本文详细介绍了政策转移的关键过程、机制和结果,并在此过程中反映了正统和非正统/社会建构主义政策转移方法在理解刑事司法方案转移案件结果方面的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring criminal justice policy transfer models and mobilities using a case study of violence reduction
Although there is growing interest in criminal justice policy transfer, a dearth of empirical research in this area has been acknowledged. This article addresses this gap by presenting the results of research conducted on a case of policy transfer of a criminal justice programme, focused on group/gang violence reduction, from America to Scotland. Policy transfer models were used to develop, frame and conduct the analysis of what was considered a ‘successful’ programme transfer; however, it was found that no single model could fully account conceptually for a key finding of the research, namely a policy transfer ‘backflow’. This article details the key processes, mechanisms and outcomes of the policy transfer and in doing so reflects on the usefulness of orthodox and non-orthodox/social-constructionist policy transfer approaches in understanding the outcomes of this case of criminal justice programme transfer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Criminology & Criminal Justice
Criminology & Criminal Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
68
期刊最新文献
Situational context and public perceptions of officer appearance: A vignette-based study of police uniforms and accouterments How cryptomarket communities navigate marketplace structures, risk perceptions and ideologies amid evolving cryptocurrency practices Evaluation of an enhanced behavioural monitoring system in UK open prisons ‘I’m a red-blooded male’: Understanding men’s experiences of domestic abuse through a feminist lens Stable housing, ‘home’ and desistance: Views from Aotearoa New Zealand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1