芍药的抗伤害作用。小鼠的大叶根提取物

Q3 Health Professions Traditional and Integrative Medicine Pub Date : 2023-04-08 DOI:10.18502/tim.v8i1.12398
H. Monsef-Esfahani, Sahand Jamshidi, P. Sharafi-Badr, M. Sharifzadeh, M. Vazirian, S. N. Sadati Lamardi
{"title":"芍药的抗伤害作用。小鼠的大叶根提取物","authors":"H. Monsef-Esfahani, Sahand Jamshidi, P. Sharafi-Badr, M. Sharifzadeh, M. Vazirian, S. N. Sadati Lamardi","doi":"10.18502/tim.v8i1.12398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to assess the antinociceptive activity of extracts and fractions of Paeonia daurica subsp. macrophylla in BALB/c mice. Various doses of hydro-alcoholic extract (HE), hexane fraction (F-hexane), methanol (F-MeOH), and chloroform (F-CHCl3), as well as aqueous extracts (AE), were evaluated by a well-known model, a formalin-induced pain test in mice. All extracts, piroxicam 0.1 mg/kg, and negative control groups were administered 30 minutes before formalin injection. Flinching, licking, and biting reflexes were measured as painful factors compared with controls at intervals of 0 to 5 minutes, 0 to 15, and 0 to 60 minutes after formalin injection. The acute oral toxicity test of total ethanolic and aqueous extracts showed no signs of toxic effect up to a dose of 5000 mg/kg. In the formalin test at a time interval of 0 to 5 minutes, there was no significant difference between the results of the study groups. In the range of 0 to 15 minutes, the effect of AE (1 g/kg), HE (2, 3 g/kg), and F-hexane (1 g/kg) was significantly higher than the positive control group (p<0.01). In the time interval of 0 to 60 minutes as the total time of the experiment, the effect of AE (0.25 g/kg), AE (0.5, 1 g/kg), HE (2, 3 g/kg), F-hexane (1 g/kg) were significantly different than the positive control group. It can be concluded that extract of P. daurica subsp. macrophylla might be helpful in the treatment of pain in humans.","PeriodicalId":52659,"journal":{"name":"Traditional and Integrative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antinociceptive Effects of Paeonia daurica subsp. macrophylla Root Extracts in Mice\",\"authors\":\"H. Monsef-Esfahani, Sahand Jamshidi, P. Sharafi-Badr, M. Sharifzadeh, M. Vazirian, S. N. Sadati Lamardi\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/tim.v8i1.12398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to assess the antinociceptive activity of extracts and fractions of Paeonia daurica subsp. macrophylla in BALB/c mice. Various doses of hydro-alcoholic extract (HE), hexane fraction (F-hexane), methanol (F-MeOH), and chloroform (F-CHCl3), as well as aqueous extracts (AE), were evaluated by a well-known model, a formalin-induced pain test in mice. All extracts, piroxicam 0.1 mg/kg, and negative control groups were administered 30 minutes before formalin injection. Flinching, licking, and biting reflexes were measured as painful factors compared with controls at intervals of 0 to 5 minutes, 0 to 15, and 0 to 60 minutes after formalin injection. The acute oral toxicity test of total ethanolic and aqueous extracts showed no signs of toxic effect up to a dose of 5000 mg/kg. In the formalin test at a time interval of 0 to 5 minutes, there was no significant difference between the results of the study groups. In the range of 0 to 15 minutes, the effect of AE (1 g/kg), HE (2, 3 g/kg), and F-hexane (1 g/kg) was significantly higher than the positive control group (p<0.01). In the time interval of 0 to 60 minutes as the total time of the experiment, the effect of AE (0.25 g/kg), AE (0.5, 1 g/kg), HE (2, 3 g/kg), F-hexane (1 g/kg) were significantly different than the positive control group. It can be concluded that extract of P. daurica subsp. macrophylla might be helpful in the treatment of pain in humans.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Traditional and Integrative Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Traditional and Integrative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/tim.v8i1.12398\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traditional and Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/tim.v8i1.12398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评价芍药提取物和级分的镇痛活性。BALB/c小鼠中的大叶。通过众所周知的模型,即福尔马林诱导的小鼠疼痛测试,评估不同剂量的水醇提取物(HE)、己烷部分(F-己烷)、甲醇(F-MeOH)和氯仿(F-CHCl3)以及水提取物(AE)。所有提取物,吡罗昔康0.1mg/kg,阴性对照组在福尔马林注射前30分钟给药。与对照组相比,在福尔马林注射后0至5分钟、0至15分钟和0至60分钟的时间间隔内,测量眨眼、舔舐和咬反射作为疼痛因素。总乙醇和水提取物的急性口服毒性试验显示,剂量高达5000 mg/kg时没有毒性作用的迹象。在0至5分钟的福尔马林试验中,研究组的结果之间没有显著差异。在0至15分钟的范围内,AE(1 g/kg)、HE(2,3 g/kg)和F-己烷(1 g/kg。结果表明,该提取物具有较好的药用价值。大叶可能有助于治疗人类的疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antinociceptive Effects of Paeonia daurica subsp. macrophylla Root Extracts in Mice
This study aimed to assess the antinociceptive activity of extracts and fractions of Paeonia daurica subsp. macrophylla in BALB/c mice. Various doses of hydro-alcoholic extract (HE), hexane fraction (F-hexane), methanol (F-MeOH), and chloroform (F-CHCl3), as well as aqueous extracts (AE), were evaluated by a well-known model, a formalin-induced pain test in mice. All extracts, piroxicam 0.1 mg/kg, and negative control groups were administered 30 minutes before formalin injection. Flinching, licking, and biting reflexes were measured as painful factors compared with controls at intervals of 0 to 5 minutes, 0 to 15, and 0 to 60 minutes after formalin injection. The acute oral toxicity test of total ethanolic and aqueous extracts showed no signs of toxic effect up to a dose of 5000 mg/kg. In the formalin test at a time interval of 0 to 5 minutes, there was no significant difference between the results of the study groups. In the range of 0 to 15 minutes, the effect of AE (1 g/kg), HE (2, 3 g/kg), and F-hexane (1 g/kg) was significantly higher than the positive control group (p<0.01). In the time interval of 0 to 60 minutes as the total time of the experiment, the effect of AE (0.25 g/kg), AE (0.5, 1 g/kg), HE (2, 3 g/kg), F-hexane (1 g/kg) were significantly different than the positive control group. It can be concluded that extract of P. daurica subsp. macrophylla might be helpful in the treatment of pain in humans.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Traditional and Integrative Medicine
Traditional and Integrative Medicine Health Professions-Complementary and Manual Therapy
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Wound Healing Agents as Described by Avicenna in the Canon of Medicine The Cause of Kidney Stone Formation and Treatment from the Perspective of Conventional and Traditional Persian Medicine The Effects of Dietary Interventions on Cardiovascular Indexes among Individuals with Cold and Hot Temperaments Based on Persian Medicine Utilization of Complementary Medicine among Patients with Cardiovascular Disease in Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study Exploring the Role of ChatGPT in Traditional Medicine: A Friend or Foe?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1