在乌克兰行政诉讼中诉诸司法:现代现实和欧洲经验

O. Krupchan, O. Salmanova, N. Makarenko, A. Paskar, Vitalii Yatskovyna
{"title":"在乌克兰行政诉讼中诉诸司法:现代现实和欧洲经验","authors":"O. Krupchan, O. Salmanova, N. Makarenko, A. Paskar, Vitalii Yatskovyna","doi":"10.46398/cuestpol.4177.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article was to analyze the availability of justice within the Ukrainian administrative judicial system, examining its specific features in terms of martial law and the possibilities of its improvement, due to the implementation of European standards in Ukrainian legislation. The research methods used were: monographic analysis, analysis and synthesis, systemic, generalization, forecasting, etc. It has been found that the principle of access to justice is manifested in the ability of a person to receive unimpeded judicial protection and to apply for judicial protection of one's rights. It has been emphasized that the reform of the judicial procedure in the resolution of administrative disputes requires the earlier introduction of digital technologies and Artificial Intelligence technologies. This will help to ease the burden on the court system and judges, speed up the time of hearing court cases, reduce the costs of their storage and archiving, simplify the presentation of statements and evidence in court, etc. It is concluded that the implementation of the European standards of the administrative process will lead to ensuring the appropriate degree of access to justice in Ukraine and increase public confidence in the judiciary.","PeriodicalId":40854,"journal":{"name":"Cuestiones Politicas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access to Justice within Administrative Proceedings of Ukraine: Modern Realities and European Experience\",\"authors\":\"O. Krupchan, O. Salmanova, N. Makarenko, A. Paskar, Vitalii Yatskovyna\",\"doi\":\"10.46398/cuestpol.4177.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of the article was to analyze the availability of justice within the Ukrainian administrative judicial system, examining its specific features in terms of martial law and the possibilities of its improvement, due to the implementation of European standards in Ukrainian legislation. The research methods used were: monographic analysis, analysis and synthesis, systemic, generalization, forecasting, etc. It has been found that the principle of access to justice is manifested in the ability of a person to receive unimpeded judicial protection and to apply for judicial protection of one's rights. It has been emphasized that the reform of the judicial procedure in the resolution of administrative disputes requires the earlier introduction of digital technologies and Artificial Intelligence technologies. This will help to ease the burden on the court system and judges, speed up the time of hearing court cases, reduce the costs of their storage and archiving, simplify the presentation of statements and evidence in court, etc. It is concluded that the implementation of the European standards of the administrative process will lead to ensuring the appropriate degree of access to justice in Ukraine and increase public confidence in the judiciary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cuestiones Politicas\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cuestiones Politicas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4177.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuestiones Politicas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.4177.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这篇文章的目的是分析乌克兰行政司法系统中司法的可用性,审查其在戒严令方面的具体特征以及由于在乌克兰立法中实施欧洲标准而改进的可能性。所采用的研究方法有:专题分析、分析与综合、系统、概括、预测等。研究发现,诉诸司法的原则表现为一个人能够得到不受阻碍的司法保护,并申请对自己权利的司法保护。有人强调,行政争议解决司法程序的改革需要尽早引入数字技术和人工智能技术。这将有助于减轻法院系统和法官的负担,加快审理法庭案件的时间,降低案件的存储和归档成本,简化陈述和证据在法庭上的陈述等。结论是,执行欧洲行政程序标准将有助于确保乌克兰获得适当程度的司法救助,并增强公众对司法机构的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Access to Justice within Administrative Proceedings of Ukraine: Modern Realities and European Experience
The purpose of the article was to analyze the availability of justice within the Ukrainian administrative judicial system, examining its specific features in terms of martial law and the possibilities of its improvement, due to the implementation of European standards in Ukrainian legislation. The research methods used were: monographic analysis, analysis and synthesis, systemic, generalization, forecasting, etc. It has been found that the principle of access to justice is manifested in the ability of a person to receive unimpeded judicial protection and to apply for judicial protection of one's rights. It has been emphasized that the reform of the judicial procedure in the resolution of administrative disputes requires the earlier introduction of digital technologies and Artificial Intelligence technologies. This will help to ease the burden on the court system and judges, speed up the time of hearing court cases, reduce the costs of their storage and archiving, simplify the presentation of statements and evidence in court, etc. It is concluded that the implementation of the European standards of the administrative process will lead to ensuring the appropriate degree of access to justice in Ukraine and increase public confidence in the judiciary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cuestiones Politicas
Cuestiones Politicas POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
42.90%
发文量
154
期刊最新文献
Financial responsibility of the state: a comparative analysis of the European countries’ approaches in peacetime and wartime The system of political education as an institute for the professionalization of politics Recognition and normative reconstruction as a theory of justice in Axel Honneth Legislative Support Standards in the European Union in the Field of Building a System of Local Self-Government Features of the Functioning of the Legal System in the Context of Digitalization Processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1