债券息差和cds -债券基点:多德-弗兰克法案第七章的影响

IF 0.4 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Alternative Investments Pub Date : 2022-07-18 DOI:10.3905/jai.2022.1.170
Eric McAlley
{"title":"债券息差和cds -债券基点:多德-弗兰克法案第七章的影响","authors":"Eric McAlley","doi":"10.3905/jai.2022.1.170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores recent regulatory impacts on the basis spread between an entity’s single-name Credit Default Swap (CDS) and its bond spread. This spread is commonly referred to as the CDS-bond basis. In 2010, Congress passed Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act to regulate the over-the-counter (OTC) swap market. A major contribution of Title VII was that it added central clearing of OTC swaps, which intended to reduce counterparty risk and improve risk management practices in the swap market. After comparing results from before and after the initiation of central clearing of single-name CDS, we can make three contributions to the existing literature. First, counterparty default risk has less explanatory power as a driver of the CDS-bond basis after clearing is initiated. Second, CDS-bond basis spreads are higher following CDS clearing initiation. Last, bond spreads of the underlying entities of cleared, single-name CDS are lower after the initiation of central clearing. Results are robust to a control sample of non-cleared firms.","PeriodicalId":45142,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alternative Investments","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bond Spreads and CDS-Bond Basis: Impact of Dodd-Frank Title VII\",\"authors\":\"Eric McAlley\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jai.2022.1.170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores recent regulatory impacts on the basis spread between an entity’s single-name Credit Default Swap (CDS) and its bond spread. This spread is commonly referred to as the CDS-bond basis. In 2010, Congress passed Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act to regulate the over-the-counter (OTC) swap market. A major contribution of Title VII was that it added central clearing of OTC swaps, which intended to reduce counterparty risk and improve risk management practices in the swap market. After comparing results from before and after the initiation of central clearing of single-name CDS, we can make three contributions to the existing literature. First, counterparty default risk has less explanatory power as a driver of the CDS-bond basis after clearing is initiated. Second, CDS-bond basis spreads are higher following CDS clearing initiation. Last, bond spreads of the underlying entities of cleared, single-name CDS are lower after the initiation of central clearing. Results are robust to a control sample of non-cleared firms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Alternative Investments\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Alternative Investments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jai.2022.1.170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alternative Investments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jai.2022.1.170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了近期监管对实体单名信用违约互换(CDS)及其债券利差之间的基差的影响。这种价差通常被称为cds -债券基差。2010年,国会通过了《多德-弗兰克华尔街改革与消费者保护法案》第七章,以规范场外互换市场。第七章的一个主要贡献是增加了场外掉期的中央清算,旨在降低交易对手风险,改善掉期市场的风险管理实践。在比较单名CDS集中清算启动前后的结果后,我们可以对现有文献做出三点贡献。首先,清算开始后,交易对手违约风险作为cds -债券基础驱动因素的解释力较弱。其次,CDS-债券的基差在CDS结算开始后更高。最后,在中央结算开始后,已结算的单名CDS的基础实体的债券利差较低。结果对于非清算公司的控制样本是稳健的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bond Spreads and CDS-Bond Basis: Impact of Dodd-Frank Title VII
This article explores recent regulatory impacts on the basis spread between an entity’s single-name Credit Default Swap (CDS) and its bond spread. This spread is commonly referred to as the CDS-bond basis. In 2010, Congress passed Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act to regulate the over-the-counter (OTC) swap market. A major contribution of Title VII was that it added central clearing of OTC swaps, which intended to reduce counterparty risk and improve risk management practices in the swap market. After comparing results from before and after the initiation of central clearing of single-name CDS, we can make three contributions to the existing literature. First, counterparty default risk has less explanatory power as a driver of the CDS-bond basis after clearing is initiated. Second, CDS-bond basis spreads are higher following CDS clearing initiation. Last, bond spreads of the underlying entities of cleared, single-name CDS are lower after the initiation of central clearing. Results are robust to a control sample of non-cleared firms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alternative Investments (JAI) provides you with cutting-edge research and expert analysis on managing investments in hedge funds, private equity, distressed debt, commodities and futures, energy, funds of funds, and other nontraditional assets. JAI is the official publication of the Chartered Alternative Investment Analyst Association (CAIA®). JAI provides you with challenging ideas and practical tools to: •Profit from the growth of hedge funds and alternatives •Determine the optimal mix of traditional and alternative investments •Measure and track portfolio performance •Manage your alternative investment portfolio with proven risk management practices
期刊最新文献
Commodity Futures and Trend Inflation Inflation Hedging Potential of Infrastructure Sector and Sub-Sector Returns—Evidence from Emerging Markets Listed Real Estate in a Multi-Asset World: Does It Add Value? Too Much of A Good Thing? Drawbacks of Stressing Measurement of Impact Investing Editor’s Letter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1