Historicizing Roma in Central Europe: between critical whiteness and epistemic injustice

although Hungary’s more decentralized and more market-oriented model included nonagricultural activities in the countryside. The book would also have benefited from including a list of tables, and in some cases even better editing of some tables, which appear unclear. There is also a presumed mistake in the translation, for example on page (198), where CoCom has been named Comecon. But overall, this does not interfere with the reading in any noticeable way. Through the detailed description of actors in the transfers taking place, and the indepth information given in many footnotes, the reader receives a multifaceted insight into the so-called “Hungarian miracle”.