未走的路:魏勇、“多体制国家”与1980年代的两岸关系

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Asian Studies Review Pub Date : 2023-05-07 DOI:10.1080/10357823.2023.2198196
J. Feng
{"title":"未走的路:魏勇、“多体制国家”与1980年代的两岸关系","authors":"J. Feng","doi":"10.1080/10357823.2023.2198196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT There is an increasingly popular standpoint that the rise of Taiwanese identity has transformed Cross-Strait relations. The discourses of pro-unification are regarded as the antithesis of pro-independence. Seemingly, the shift from Han Chinese identity to Taiwanese identity has been a rupture in the recent development of Cross-Strait relations. This study sheds light on Wei Yung (Wei Yong, 1936–2004) and his concept of ‘multi-system nations’ to reassess this standpoint. Wei wanted to assist Taipei in recalibrating Cross-Strait relations in the late 20th century. He initiated the ‘multi-system nations’ concept to justify Taipei’s adoption of dual recognition and parallel (international) participation. Wei used this concept to defend Taiwanese political scientists’ collective representation in the International Political Science Association. However, the result was not as he had wished. Although Wei's concept of ‘multi-system nations’ is outdated and his wishful thinking about China’s unification has become a path not taken for both Taipei and Beijing, this study shows that there is in fact common ground between the sympathisers of pro-independence and the advocates of unification.","PeriodicalId":46499,"journal":{"name":"Asian Studies Review","volume":"47 1","pages":"818 - 835"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Path not Taken: Wei Yung, ‘Multi-System Nations’, and Cross-Strait Relations in the 1980s\",\"authors\":\"J. Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10357823.2023.2198196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT There is an increasingly popular standpoint that the rise of Taiwanese identity has transformed Cross-Strait relations. The discourses of pro-unification are regarded as the antithesis of pro-independence. Seemingly, the shift from Han Chinese identity to Taiwanese identity has been a rupture in the recent development of Cross-Strait relations. This study sheds light on Wei Yung (Wei Yong, 1936–2004) and his concept of ‘multi-system nations’ to reassess this standpoint. Wei wanted to assist Taipei in recalibrating Cross-Strait relations in the late 20th century. He initiated the ‘multi-system nations’ concept to justify Taipei’s adoption of dual recognition and parallel (international) participation. Wei used this concept to defend Taiwanese political scientists’ collective representation in the International Political Science Association. However, the result was not as he had wished. Although Wei's concept of ‘multi-system nations’ is outdated and his wishful thinking about China’s unification has become a path not taken for both Taipei and Beijing, this study shows that there is in fact common ground between the sympathisers of pro-independence and the advocates of unification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46499,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Studies Review\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"818 - 835\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Studies Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2023.2198196\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2023.2198196","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的人认为,台湾认同的崛起改变了两岸关系。主张统一的话语被视为主张独立的话语的对立面。从汉人身份到台湾人身份的转变,似乎是最近两岸关系发展中的一个断裂。本研究揭示了魏勇(Wei Yong, 1936-2004)及其“多体系国家”的概念,以重新评估这一观点。魏希望在20世纪后期帮助台北重新调整两岸关系。他提出了“多体系国家”的概念,以证明台北采取双重承认和平等(国际)参与的合理性。魏用这个概念来捍卫台湾政治科学家在国际政治科学协会的集体代表权。然而,结果并不如他所愿。虽然魏的“多体制国家”的概念已经过时,他对中国统一的一厢情愿的想法已经成为台北和北京都没有采取的道路,但这项研究表明,支持独立的同情者和主张统一的人之间实际上存在共同点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Path not Taken: Wei Yung, ‘Multi-System Nations’, and Cross-Strait Relations in the 1980s
ABSTRACT There is an increasingly popular standpoint that the rise of Taiwanese identity has transformed Cross-Strait relations. The discourses of pro-unification are regarded as the antithesis of pro-independence. Seemingly, the shift from Han Chinese identity to Taiwanese identity has been a rupture in the recent development of Cross-Strait relations. This study sheds light on Wei Yung (Wei Yong, 1936–2004) and his concept of ‘multi-system nations’ to reassess this standpoint. Wei wanted to assist Taipei in recalibrating Cross-Strait relations in the late 20th century. He initiated the ‘multi-system nations’ concept to justify Taipei’s adoption of dual recognition and parallel (international) participation. Wei used this concept to defend Taiwanese political scientists’ collective representation in the International Political Science Association. However, the result was not as he had wished. Although Wei's concept of ‘multi-system nations’ is outdated and his wishful thinking about China’s unification has become a path not taken for both Taipei and Beijing, this study shows that there is in fact common ground between the sympathisers of pro-independence and the advocates of unification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
73
期刊最新文献
Objectification, Bodily Revenge, and National Identity: Refashioning ‘Comfort Women’ in Chinese Cinema Migration, Vulnerability, and Protection: Changing Labour Law Regime in Contemporary India BOOK REVIEW Humour in Asian cultures: tradition and context , edited by Jessica Milner Davis, Routledge, 2022, 336 pp., £145.00 (hardback), £35.09 (eBook) The Shadow Economy and Social Change in North Korea BOOK REVIEW Xi Jinping’s China: the personal and the political , by Stig Stenslie & Marte Kjær Galtung, Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2023, 179 pp., US$95.00 (hardback)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1