进口替代和/或出口导向:印度制药业的案例

М. А. Губина
{"title":"进口替代和/或出口导向:印度制药业的案例","authors":"М. А. Губина","doi":"10.21638/spbu05.2019.202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is devoted to Indian experience of catch-up development strategy implementation in the pharmaceutical industry. Economic development in various countries is sometimes based upon import substitution system. But for the officially supported programs, production sectors used to demonstrate low competitiveness (or worse). On the other hand, alternative industrial strategies (export-orientation) tend to be resulting considerable performance and promotion on the global market. So, the following issues have attracted our attention: 1) effects of catch-up development policy enforcement in Indian pharmaceutical industry (from 1947 up to now); 2) identification of competitive differentiators in Indian pharmaceutical industry. The research showed that Indian pharmaceutics success had been determined by combination of external and internal factors: a wide range of import substitution and export-oriented tools and activities (internal factors); forfeiture of patent rights of leading medical products on the international market that had encouraged some Indian medicine manufacturers to advance; essential need to control increasing drug expenditures in the USA and regulations established by Hatch-Waxman Act in 1984 (external factors). Those factors facilitated Indian generics expansion and brought Indian companies to leading positions on the American generic market. Top-priority industries can yield huge dividends eventually provided that state-backed policy is pursued. The other article worth mentioning is that effect of the import substitution activity is time limited. Export-oriented policy is recognized as more productive and profitable in the long run.","PeriodicalId":41730,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Ekonomika-St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Import Substitution and/or Export Orientation: the Case of Indian Pharmaceutical Industry\",\"authors\":\"М. А. Губина\",\"doi\":\"10.21638/spbu05.2019.202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is devoted to Indian experience of catch-up development strategy implementation in the pharmaceutical industry. Economic development in various countries is sometimes based upon import substitution system. But for the officially supported programs, production sectors used to demonstrate low competitiveness (or worse). On the other hand, alternative industrial strategies (export-orientation) tend to be resulting considerable performance and promotion on the global market. So, the following issues have attracted our attention: 1) effects of catch-up development policy enforcement in Indian pharmaceutical industry (from 1947 up to now); 2) identification of competitive differentiators in Indian pharmaceutical industry. The research showed that Indian pharmaceutics success had been determined by combination of external and internal factors: a wide range of import substitution and export-oriented tools and activities (internal factors); forfeiture of patent rights of leading medical products on the international market that had encouraged some Indian medicine manufacturers to advance; essential need to control increasing drug expenditures in the USA and regulations established by Hatch-Waxman Act in 1984 (external factors). Those factors facilitated Indian generics expansion and brought Indian companies to leading positions on the American generic market. Top-priority industries can yield huge dividends eventually provided that state-backed policy is pursued. The other article worth mentioning is that effect of the import substitution activity is time limited. Export-oriented policy is recognized as more productive and profitable in the long run.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Ekonomika-St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Ekonomika-St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2019.202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Ekonomika-St Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2019.202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文旨在探讨印度在医药行业实施赶超发展战略的经验。许多国家的经济发展有时是以进口替代制度为基础的。但在官方支持的项目中,生产部门过去表现出较低的竞争力(甚至更糟)。另一方面,其他工业战略(出口导向)往往在全球市场上产生可观的业绩和促进。因此,以下问题引起了我们的关注:1)追赶发展政策在印度制药业的实施效果(1947年至今);2)印度制药业竞争差异化因素的识别。研究表明,印度制药业的成功是由外部和内部因素共同决定的:广泛的进口替代和面向出口的工具和活动(内部因素);国际市场上领先医疗产品的专利权被没收,这种专利权曾鼓励一些印度药品制造商向前发展;控制美国不断增加的药品支出的基本需要和1984年哈奇-韦克斯曼法案制定的法规(外部因素)。这些因素促进了印度仿制药的扩张,并使印度公司在美国仿制药市场上处于领先地位。只要国家支持的政策得到贯彻,重点产业最终可以产生巨大的红利。另一篇文章值得一提的是,进口替代活动的效果是有时间限制的。从长远来看,以出口为导向的政策被认为更有生产力和利润。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Import Substitution and/or Export Orientation: the Case of Indian Pharmaceutical Industry
This article is devoted to Indian experience of catch-up development strategy implementation in the pharmaceutical industry. Economic development in various countries is sometimes based upon import substitution system. But for the officially supported programs, production sectors used to demonstrate low competitiveness (or worse). On the other hand, alternative industrial strategies (export-orientation) tend to be resulting considerable performance and promotion on the global market. So, the following issues have attracted our attention: 1) effects of catch-up development policy enforcement in Indian pharmaceutical industry (from 1947 up to now); 2) identification of competitive differentiators in Indian pharmaceutical industry. The research showed that Indian pharmaceutics success had been determined by combination of external and internal factors: a wide range of import substitution and export-oriented tools and activities (internal factors); forfeiture of patent rights of leading medical products on the international market that had encouraged some Indian medicine manufacturers to advance; essential need to control increasing drug expenditures in the USA and regulations established by Hatch-Waxman Act in 1984 (external factors). Those factors facilitated Indian generics expansion and brought Indian companies to leading positions on the American generic market. Top-priority industries can yield huge dividends eventually provided that state-backed policy is pursued. The other article worth mentioning is that effect of the import substitution activity is time limited. Export-oriented policy is recognized as more productive and profitable in the long run.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Modeling the impact of stock exchange migration on trading volumes in competing markets Central bank digital currencies: An innovative tool for enhancing domestic and cross-border payments and settlements Green agenda in the modern practice of countries and regions: In search of a unified approach Reflection of the concept of energy transfer in the development strategies of industries and regions of Russia The verification of regional capital mobility in the Russian Federation: A spatial econometric approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1