在分析具有一个以上变率源的过程时出现的异常

IF 2.4 2区 数学 Q2 BIOLOGY Biometrika Pub Date : 2023-07-18 DOI:10.1093/biomet/asad044
H. Battey, P. McCullagh
{"title":"在分析具有一个以上变率源的过程时出现的异常","authors":"H. Battey, P. McCullagh","doi":"10.1093/biomet/asad044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n It is frequently observed in practice that the Wald statistic gives a poor assessment of the statistical significance of a variance component. This paper provides detailed analytic insight into the phenomenon by way of two simple models, which point to an atypical geometry as the source of the aberration. The latter can in principle be checked numerically to cover situations of arbitrary complexity, such as those arising from elaborate forms of blocking in an experimental context, or models for longitudinal or clustered data. The salient point, echoing Dickey (2020), is that a suitable likelihood-ratio test should always be used for the assessment of variance components.","PeriodicalId":9001,"journal":{"name":"Biometrika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An anomaly arising in the analysis of processes with more than one source of variability\",\"authors\":\"H. Battey, P. McCullagh\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/biomet/asad044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n It is frequently observed in practice that the Wald statistic gives a poor assessment of the statistical significance of a variance component. This paper provides detailed analytic insight into the phenomenon by way of two simple models, which point to an atypical geometry as the source of the aberration. The latter can in principle be checked numerically to cover situations of arbitrary complexity, such as those arising from elaborate forms of blocking in an experimental context, or models for longitudinal or clustered data. The salient point, echoing Dickey (2020), is that a suitable likelihood-ratio test should always be used for the assessment of variance components.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9001,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biometrika\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biometrika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asad044\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometrika","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asad044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在实践中经常观察到Wald统计量对方差成分的统计显著性给出了很差的评估。本文通过两个简单的模型对这一现象提供了详细的分析见解,这两个模型指出非典型几何形状是像差的来源。后者原则上可以通过数值检查来涵盖任意复杂性的情况,例如在实验环境中由复杂形式的阻塞引起的情况,或者纵向或集群数据的模型。与Dickey(2020)相呼应的重点是,应该始终使用合适的似然比检验来评估方差成分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An anomaly arising in the analysis of processes with more than one source of variability
It is frequently observed in practice that the Wald statistic gives a poor assessment of the statistical significance of a variance component. This paper provides detailed analytic insight into the phenomenon by way of two simple models, which point to an atypical geometry as the source of the aberration. The latter can in principle be checked numerically to cover situations of arbitrary complexity, such as those arising from elaborate forms of blocking in an experimental context, or models for longitudinal or clustered data. The salient point, echoing Dickey (2020), is that a suitable likelihood-ratio test should always be used for the assessment of variance components.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biometrika
Biometrika 生物-生物学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
56
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biometrika is primarily a journal of statistics in which emphasis is placed on papers containing original theoretical contributions of direct or potential value in applications. From time to time, papers in bordering fields are also published.
期刊最新文献
Local Bootstrap for Network Data A Simple Bootstrap for Chatterjee's Rank Correlation Sensitivity models and bounds under sequential unmeasured confounding in longitudinal studies Studies in the history of probability and statistics, LI: the first conditional logistic regression Robust Covariate-Balancing Method in Learning Optimal Individualized Treatment Regimes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1