在量子统计的早期历史中,Natanson 1911年的文章被忽略的社会和心理方面

Q1 Arts and Humanities Studia Historiae Scientiarum Pub Date : 2018-12-12 DOI:10.4467/2543702XSHS.18.014.9334
N. Nagasawa
{"title":"在量子统计的早期历史中,Natanson 1911年的文章被忽略的社会和心理方面","authors":"N. Nagasawa","doi":"10.4467/2543702XSHS.18.014.9334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Possible reasons are studied why Ladislas (Władysław) Natanson’s paper on the statistical theory of radiation, published in 1911 both in English and in the German translation, was not cited properly in the early history of quantum statistics by outstanding scientists, such as Arnold Sommerfeld, Paul Ehrenfest, Satyendra Nath Bose and Albert Einstein.\n\nThe social and psychological aspects are discussed as background to many so far discussions on the academic evaluation of his theory.\n\nIn order to avoid in the future such Natansonian cases of very limited reception of valuable scientific works, it is proposed to introduce a digital tag in which all the information of relevant papers published so far should be automatically accumulated and updated.","PeriodicalId":36875,"journal":{"name":"Studia Historiae Scientiarum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On social and psychological aspects of a negligible reception of Natanson’s article of 1911 in the early history of quantum statistics\",\"authors\":\"N. Nagasawa\",\"doi\":\"10.4467/2543702XSHS.18.014.9334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Possible reasons are studied why Ladislas (Władysław) Natanson’s paper on the statistical theory of radiation, published in 1911 both in English and in the German translation, was not cited properly in the early history of quantum statistics by outstanding scientists, such as Arnold Sommerfeld, Paul Ehrenfest, Satyendra Nath Bose and Albert Einstein.\\n\\nThe social and psychological aspects are discussed as background to many so far discussions on the academic evaluation of his theory.\\n\\nIn order to avoid in the future such Natansonian cases of very limited reception of valuable scientific works, it is proposed to introduce a digital tag in which all the information of relevant papers published so far should be automatically accumulated and updated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Historiae Scientiarum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Historiae Scientiarum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.18.014.9334\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Historiae Scientiarum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.18.014.9334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

研究了Ladislas(Władys 322; aw)Natanson于1911年发表的关于辐射统计理论的论文在早期量子统计史上没有被杰出的科学家正确引用的可能原因,如Arnold Sommerfeld、Paul Ehrenfest、,萨延德拉·纳特·博斯和阿尔伯特·爱因斯坦。社会和心理方面的讨论是迄今为止关于学术评价他的理论的许多讨论的背景。为了避免在未来出现纳坦森式的情况,即对有价值的科学著作的接收非常有限,建议引入一种数字标签,在该标签中,迄今为止发表的相关论文的所有信息都应自动累积和更新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On social and psychological aspects of a negligible reception of Natanson’s article of 1911 in the early history of quantum statistics
Possible reasons are studied why Ladislas (Władysław) Natanson’s paper on the statistical theory of radiation, published in 1911 both in English and in the German translation, was not cited properly in the early history of quantum statistics by outstanding scientists, such as Arnold Sommerfeld, Paul Ehrenfest, Satyendra Nath Bose and Albert Einstein. The social and psychological aspects are discussed as background to many so far discussions on the academic evaluation of his theory. In order to avoid in the future such Natansonian cases of very limited reception of valuable scientific works, it is proposed to introduce a digital tag in which all the information of relevant papers published so far should be automatically accumulated and updated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Historiae Scientiarum
Studia Historiae Scientiarum Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Nowa propozycja periodyzacji dziejów botaniki w Polsce Dlaczego nadal interesuje nas Mikołaj Kopernik (1473–1543)? 550-lecie urodzin Mikołaja Kopernika i 150-lecie pierwszego publicznego posiedzenia Akademii Umiejętności w Krakowie Under the Spell of Distant Landscapes: On the Lives and Work of a Few Famous Hungarian Travellers and Explorers after 1945 – an Introduction to the Topic for English-Speaking Readers Uzupełniony wykaz polskich czasopism historycznych oparty na modelu ewaluacji czasopism opracowanym przez Pracownię Naukoznawstwa IHN PAN Incommensurability Explained in the Terms of Presuppositions. A Comment to Kuhn’s Thesis on Radical Meaning Variance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1