技术创业的两阶段方法:知识产权的差异效应

IF 1.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT Technology Innovation Management Review Pub Date : 2020-06-30 DOI:10.22215/timreview/1364
Saurav Pathak, Etayankara Muralidharan
{"title":"技术创业的两阶段方法:知识产权的差异效应","authors":"Saurav Pathak, Etayankara Muralidharan","doi":"10.22215/timreview/1364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article we examine how the strength of the intellectual property rights (IPR) regime drives technology entrepreneurship innovation (TEI). The latter is comprised of novel unfamiliar technological products and new business models, which in turn lead to new product-market combinations. We consider TEI to be a two-stage process that involves access to and use of new technologies and technological resources by entrepreneurs. While stronger IPR may constrain easy availability of new technologies and technological resources for entrepreneurs, using technology itself helps lead to TEI. We suggest that stronger IPR regimes could lead to TEI. The positive effect of TEI is felt through easier accessibility to the latest technologies and technology resources by entrepreneurs. Our model contributes to understanding the effect of strong IPR regimes on different stages of the innovation process. Intellectual-property rules are clearly necessary to spur innovation: if every invention could be stolen, or every new drug immediately copied, few people would invest in innovation. But too much protection can strangle competition and can limit what economists call 'incremental innovation' innovations that build, in some way, on others.","PeriodicalId":51569,"journal":{"name":"Technology Innovation Management Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Two-Staged Approach to Technology Entrepreneurship: Differential Effects of Intellectual Property Rights\",\"authors\":\"Saurav Pathak, Etayankara Muralidharan\",\"doi\":\"10.22215/timreview/1364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article we examine how the strength of the intellectual property rights (IPR) regime drives technology entrepreneurship innovation (TEI). The latter is comprised of novel unfamiliar technological products and new business models, which in turn lead to new product-market combinations. We consider TEI to be a two-stage process that involves access to and use of new technologies and technological resources by entrepreneurs. While stronger IPR may constrain easy availability of new technologies and technological resources for entrepreneurs, using technology itself helps lead to TEI. We suggest that stronger IPR regimes could lead to TEI. The positive effect of TEI is felt through easier accessibility to the latest technologies and technology resources by entrepreneurs. Our model contributes to understanding the effect of strong IPR regimes on different stages of the innovation process. Intellectual-property rules are clearly necessary to spur innovation: if every invention could be stolen, or every new drug immediately copied, few people would invest in innovation. But too much protection can strangle competition and can limit what economists call 'incremental innovation' innovations that build, in some way, on others.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology Innovation Management Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology Innovation Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology Innovation Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

在本文中,我们研究了知识产权(IPR)制度的力量如何推动技术创业创新(TEI)。后者是由新奇的不熟悉的技术产品和新的商业模式组成的,这反过来又导致新的产品-市场组合。我们认为技术创新是一个两阶段的过程,涉及企业家获得和使用新技术和技术资源。虽然加强知识产权可能限制企业家容易获得新技术和技术资源,但利用技术本身有助于实现技术创新。我们认为,更强有力的知识产权制度可能导致技术创新。技术产业投资的积极影响体现在企业家更容易获得最新技术和技术资源。我们的模型有助于理解强有力的知识产权制度对创新过程不同阶段的影响。知识产权规则对于刺激创新显然是必要的:如果每一项发明都可能被窃取,或者每一种新药都可能被立即复制,那么很少有人会投资于创新。但过多的保护会扼杀竞争,限制经济学家所说的“渐进式创新”,即在某种程度上以他人为基础的创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Two-Staged Approach to Technology Entrepreneurship: Differential Effects of Intellectual Property Rights
In this article we examine how the strength of the intellectual property rights (IPR) regime drives technology entrepreneurship innovation (TEI). The latter is comprised of novel unfamiliar technological products and new business models, which in turn lead to new product-market combinations. We consider TEI to be a two-stage process that involves access to and use of new technologies and technological resources by entrepreneurs. While stronger IPR may constrain easy availability of new technologies and technological resources for entrepreneurs, using technology itself helps lead to TEI. We suggest that stronger IPR regimes could lead to TEI. The positive effect of TEI is felt through easier accessibility to the latest technologies and technology resources by entrepreneurs. Our model contributes to understanding the effect of strong IPR regimes on different stages of the innovation process. Intellectual-property rules are clearly necessary to spur innovation: if every invention could be stolen, or every new drug immediately copied, few people would invest in innovation. But too much protection can strangle competition and can limit what economists call 'incremental innovation' innovations that build, in some way, on others.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Employment of highly-skilled migrants during the pandemic: Focus on internal migration in Indonesia. Editorial: Blockchain and Digital Transformation Can Blockchain Improve Healthcare Management? Interview: Blockchain and Digital Transformation in Financial Services, Part I Coping with the Double-Edged Sword of Data-Sharing in Ecosystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1