在非英语国家的高等教育机构中,英语子技能认可的实证证据,性别之间和面对面/在线测试

IF 0.1 4区 教育学 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Cadmo Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3280/cad2021-002004
B. Gutiérrez-Barba, Alejandro Emanuelle Menéndez
{"title":"在非英语国家的高等教育机构中,英语子技能认可的实证证据,性别之间和面对面/在线测试","authors":"B. Gutiérrez-Barba, Alejandro Emanuelle Menéndez","doi":"10.3280/cad2021-002004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 2017, The National Polytechnic Institute (IPN) in México started requiring proof of competence of A1 English abilities in cases of specialties, two B1 abilities in cases of master's degrees, and three abilities in cases of doctorate programs as part of its graduate admission process.(it means competence in any of the language abilities). This vagueness motivated this investigation; it is based on the results of the English institutional exam from 2016-2019. We studied data using Pearson correlation, ANOVA, and Main Components Analysis. We found a higher average score for listening comprehension and lower performance on writing; reading comprehension explains 56.08% of the overall language dominance. Even we found some novel differences for speaking and writing among genders, we did not find conclusive differences among online tests - face to face tests. The speaking and the writing show the highest correlation. We outlined some suggestions for English admission requirements.","PeriodicalId":41957,"journal":{"name":"Cadmo","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical evidence on English subskills approval, between sexes and face to face/on line tests in a not anglophone higher education institution\",\"authors\":\"B. Gutiérrez-Barba, Alejandro Emanuelle Menéndez\",\"doi\":\"10.3280/cad2021-002004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since 2017, The National Polytechnic Institute (IPN) in México started requiring proof of competence of A1 English abilities in cases of specialties, two B1 abilities in cases of master's degrees, and three abilities in cases of doctorate programs as part of its graduate admission process.(it means competence in any of the language abilities). This vagueness motivated this investigation; it is based on the results of the English institutional exam from 2016-2019. We studied data using Pearson correlation, ANOVA, and Main Components Analysis. We found a higher average score for listening comprehension and lower performance on writing; reading comprehension explains 56.08% of the overall language dominance. Even we found some novel differences for speaking and writing among genders, we did not find conclusive differences among online tests - face to face tests. The speaking and the writing show the highest correlation. We outlined some suggestions for English admission requirements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cadmo\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cadmo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3280/cad2021-002004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cadmo","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/cad2021-002004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自2017年以来,墨西哥国立理工学院(IPN)开始要求提供A1专业英语能力、两个B1硕士学位能力和三个博士学位能力的能力证明,作为其研究生入学程序的一部分。(意思是任何一种语言能力的能力)。这种模糊性促使了这项调查;它基于2016-2019年的英语机构考试成绩。我们使用Pearson相关、ANOVA和主成分分析对数据进行了研究。我们发现听力理解的平均得分较高,而写作成绩较低;阅读理解解释了56.08%的总体语言优势。即使我们发现了性别之间在口语和写作方面的一些新颖差异,我们也没有发现在线测试——面对面测试——之间的决定性差异。口语和写作表现出最高的相关性。我们概述了一些关于英语入学要求的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Empirical evidence on English subskills approval, between sexes and face to face/on line tests in a not anglophone higher education institution
Since 2017, The National Polytechnic Institute (IPN) in México started requiring proof of competence of A1 English abilities in cases of specialties, two B1 abilities in cases of master's degrees, and three abilities in cases of doctorate programs as part of its graduate admission process.(it means competence in any of the language abilities). This vagueness motivated this investigation; it is based on the results of the English institutional exam from 2016-2019. We studied data using Pearson correlation, ANOVA, and Main Components Analysis. We found a higher average score for listening comprehension and lower performance on writing; reading comprehension explains 56.08% of the overall language dominance. Even we found some novel differences for speaking and writing among genders, we did not find conclusive differences among online tests - face to face tests. The speaking and the writing show the highest correlation. We outlined some suggestions for English admission requirements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cadmo
Cadmo EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Galileo. Scienza e sapienza. (Editoriale) La narrazione digitale per l'inclusione sociale: primi risultati del progetto LIDA - Learning Inclusion in a Digital Age Experiential Learning: Does Project-Based Learning Enhance Students' Professional Competencies? Ricerche in corso Galileo e il pendolo: un esempio di scienza viva
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1