事情在某种程度上与表面上不同,或者如何在没有解决方案的情况下创建主题

IF 0.2 4区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Archeologicke Rozhledy Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.35686/ar.2022.6
Miroslav Šmíd, P. Limburský
{"title":"事情在某种程度上与表面上不同,或者如何在没有解决方案的情况下创建主题","authors":"Miroslav Šmíd, P. Limburský","doi":"10.35686/ar.2022.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gaining an understanding of the history of Moravian prehistory in the phase of the transition from the proto-Eneolithic to the Early Eneolithic runs headlong into a range of problems, not least of which is the limited number of reliable find units. Like radiocarbon dating and genetics, typo-chronology is no end-all in this situation, merely one of many parts of a complex view, albeit one that it critical to archaeology. An interpretation based on incorrect work with radiocarbon dates pushes the discussion beyond the threshold of credible picture of the past. This article discusses both aspects and, based on examples exposing errors made by F. Trampota and P. Květina in the course of processing 14C dates and interpreting modelled data, demonstrates that some of their conclusions cannot be regarded as sufficiently supported.","PeriodicalId":54176,"journal":{"name":"Archeologicke Rozhledy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Věci se mají trochu jinak aneb Jak vytvořit téma bez závěrů / Things are somewhat different than they appear, or How to create a topic without a solution\",\"authors\":\"Miroslav Šmíd, P. Limburský\",\"doi\":\"10.35686/ar.2022.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gaining an understanding of the history of Moravian prehistory in the phase of the transition from the proto-Eneolithic to the Early Eneolithic runs headlong into a range of problems, not least of which is the limited number of reliable find units. Like radiocarbon dating and genetics, typo-chronology is no end-all in this situation, merely one of many parts of a complex view, albeit one that it critical to archaeology. An interpretation based on incorrect work with radiocarbon dates pushes the discussion beyond the threshold of credible picture of the past. This article discusses both aspects and, based on examples exposing errors made by F. Trampota and P. Květina in the course of processing 14C dates and interpreting modelled data, demonstrates that some of their conclusions cannot be regarded as sufficiently supported.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archeologicke Rozhledy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archeologicke Rozhledy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35686/ar.2022.6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archeologicke Rozhledy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35686/ar.2022.6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在从原始新石器时代到早期新石器时代的过渡阶段,对摩拉维亚史前历史的理解会遇到一系列问题,其中最重要的是可靠的发现单位数量有限。就像放射性碳定年法和遗传学一样,排字年代学在这种情况下并不是终点,它只是一个复杂观点的众多部分之一,尽管它对考古学至关重要。基于放射性碳年代测定的不正确的解释使讨论超出了过去可信图景的界限。本文讨论了这两个方面,并基于揭露F. Trampota和P. kv tina在处理14C数据和解释建模数据过程中所犯错误的例子,证明他们的一些结论不能被视为得到充分支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Věci se mají trochu jinak aneb Jak vytvořit téma bez závěrů / Things are somewhat different than they appear, or How to create a topic without a solution
Gaining an understanding of the history of Moravian prehistory in the phase of the transition from the proto-Eneolithic to the Early Eneolithic runs headlong into a range of problems, not least of which is the limited number of reliable find units. Like radiocarbon dating and genetics, typo-chronology is no end-all in this situation, merely one of many parts of a complex view, albeit one that it critical to archaeology. An interpretation based on incorrect work with radiocarbon dates pushes the discussion beyond the threshold of credible picture of the past. This article discusses both aspects and, based on examples exposing errors made by F. Trampota and P. Květina in the course of processing 14C dates and interpreting modelled data, demonstrates that some of their conclusions cannot be regarded as sufficiently supported.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archeologicke Rozhledy
Archeologicke Rozhledy ARCHAEOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
33.30%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Archeologické rozhledy jsou recenzovaný časopis. Příspěvky procházejí recenzním řízením, jehož výsledek slouží k formulaci vyjádření redakce. Za věcný obsah příspěvků odpovídá autor. Příspěvky nejsou honorovány. Nezbytnou součástí každého článku je max. třístránkový český podklad pro překlad, nebo dvou až čtyřstránkový cizojazyčný souhrn, dále český abstrakt postihující cíl práce, v rozsahu 7-12 řádků, a 5-7 klíčových slov, kontaktní adresa autora.
期刊最新文献
Pavel Vařeka a kolektiv autorů: Svědectví archeologie o tzv. cikánském táboře v Letech. Význam histotafonomie a terénní antropologie při rekonstrukci pohřebního ritu kultury se šňůrovou keramikou na Moravě 50 let petroarcheologie. 6. mezinárodní petroarcheologické sympozium, Wrocław 24.–25. 9. 2020 Organické nádoby na vodu ze studny kultury s lineární keramikou v Mohelnici, okr. Šumperk Did they leave or not?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1