数字新闻中的流动制度逻辑

IF 0.6 Q4 BUSINESS Journal of Media Business Studies Pub Date : 2020-04-02 DOI:10.1080/16522354.2019.1699764
Juliane A. Lischka
{"title":"数字新闻中的流动制度逻辑","authors":"Juliane A. Lischka","doi":"10.1080/16522354.2019.1699764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The negotiation of competing institutional logics is relevant for organisations active in multi-institutional domains. News organisations are active in the domains of democracy and business, and, through digitisation, they are active in the digital technology domain. This article describes how journalism negotiates competing logics of these domains, i.e. professional, market, managerial, and technology (tech) logics. Analysing n = 744 individual NiemanLab Predictions for Journalism from 2014 to 2019, findings indicate that journalism aggregates and integrates competing logics in a fluid way, keeping synergies across logics and plurality of logics high. The field of journalism is shaped by the competition of four logics: While tech logics induce changes in professional, market, and managerial logics, professional logics remain the dominant moral compass for journalists.","PeriodicalId":45673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Business Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/16522354.2019.1699764","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fluid institutional logics in digital journalism\",\"authors\":\"Juliane A. Lischka\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16522354.2019.1699764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The negotiation of competing institutional logics is relevant for organisations active in multi-institutional domains. News organisations are active in the domains of democracy and business, and, through digitisation, they are active in the digital technology domain. This article describes how journalism negotiates competing logics of these domains, i.e. professional, market, managerial, and technology (tech) logics. Analysing n = 744 individual NiemanLab Predictions for Journalism from 2014 to 2019, findings indicate that journalism aggregates and integrates competing logics in a fluid way, keeping synergies across logics and plurality of logics high. The field of journalism is shaped by the competition of four logics: While tech logics induce changes in professional, market, and managerial logics, professional logics remain the dominant moral compass for journalists.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Media Business Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/16522354.2019.1699764\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Media Business Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2019.1699764\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Media Business Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16522354.2019.1699764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

竞争制度逻辑的谈判与活跃在多制度领域的组织有关。新闻机构活跃在民主和商业领域,通过数字化,它们活跃在数字技术领域。这篇文章描述了新闻是如何协调这些领域的竞争逻辑的,即专业逻辑、市场逻辑、管理逻辑和技术逻辑。对2014年至2019年n = 744个NiemanLab新闻预测的分析结果表明,新闻以一种流动的方式聚合和整合竞争逻辑,保持了逻辑之间的协同效应和逻辑的多元性。新闻领域是由四种逻辑的竞争所塑造的:虽然技术引发了专业逻辑、市场逻辑和管理逻辑的变化,但专业逻辑仍然是新闻工作者的主要道德指南针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fluid institutional logics in digital journalism
ABSTRACT The negotiation of competing institutional logics is relevant for organisations active in multi-institutional domains. News organisations are active in the domains of democracy and business, and, through digitisation, they are active in the digital technology domain. This article describes how journalism negotiates competing logics of these domains, i.e. professional, market, managerial, and technology (tech) logics. Analysing n = 744 individual NiemanLab Predictions for Journalism from 2014 to 2019, findings indicate that journalism aggregates and integrates competing logics in a fluid way, keeping synergies across logics and plurality of logics high. The field of journalism is shaped by the competition of four logics: While tech logics induce changes in professional, market, and managerial logics, professional logics remain the dominant moral compass for journalists.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Innovation in the esports servicescape: a media business research agenda AI in the newsroom: a collective case study about newsworker-AI collaboration in the German newspaper industry Managing the narratives in narrative media brands The owner-market fit and responses to competing logics Obsolescence as a pattern: an analysis of how public service media managers perceive and cope with resistance to change in the platformisation era
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1