《出国》:贝尔纳达Ramírez(那不勒斯)和佩特罗尼拉·吉巴哈(里斯本)

IF 0.3 3区 文学 N/A LITERATURE SYMPOSIUM-A QUARTERLY JOURNAL IN MODERN LITERATURES Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/00397709.2023.2200101
Susan Paun de García
{"title":"《出国》:贝尔纳达Ramírez(那不勒斯)和佩特罗尼拉·吉巴哈(里斯本)","authors":"Susan Paun de García","doi":"10.1080/00397709.2023.2200101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract From earliest times, the life of actors or actresses was a sort of “escaparate” or showcase, always on display. Much like today’s gliteratti, they were both admired and looked down upon. If the acting profession was seen as morally reprehensible in general, the attitude toward women was no less critical. Given social norms that saw the female sex almost exclusively in terms of her body and the female actor in terms of her class, women ought to know their place and keep to it. That actresses were free to look, act, dress, and behave like their “betters” represented a threat to social and moral order, a threat as often condemned from the pulpit as confirmed in the news sources of the time. Nevertheless, then as now, a good scandal—one involving the highest levels of society and carried on abroad—could “make” one’s career. Two examples of “making it” abroad—a hundred years apart—are Bernarda Ramírez (1615?–1662) and Petronila Jibaja (1692–1763). Both were of humble origin, both were admired, favored, and kept by aristocrats abroad, and both returned to Spain with fame and fortune that they were able to maintain until their careers ended.","PeriodicalId":45184,"journal":{"name":"SYMPOSIUM-A QUARTERLY JOURNAL IN MODERN LITERATURES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making It Abroad: Bernarda Ramírez (Naples) and Petronila Jibaja (Lisbon)\",\"authors\":\"Susan Paun de García\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00397709.2023.2200101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract From earliest times, the life of actors or actresses was a sort of “escaparate” or showcase, always on display. Much like today’s gliteratti, they were both admired and looked down upon. If the acting profession was seen as morally reprehensible in general, the attitude toward women was no less critical. Given social norms that saw the female sex almost exclusively in terms of her body and the female actor in terms of her class, women ought to know their place and keep to it. That actresses were free to look, act, dress, and behave like their “betters” represented a threat to social and moral order, a threat as often condemned from the pulpit as confirmed in the news sources of the time. Nevertheless, then as now, a good scandal—one involving the highest levels of society and carried on abroad—could “make” one’s career. Two examples of “making it” abroad—a hundred years apart—are Bernarda Ramírez (1615?–1662) and Petronila Jibaja (1692–1763). Both were of humble origin, both were admired, favored, and kept by aristocrats abroad, and both returned to Spain with fame and fortune that they were able to maintain until their careers ended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SYMPOSIUM-A QUARTERLY JOURNAL IN MODERN LITERATURES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SYMPOSIUM-A QUARTERLY JOURNAL IN MODERN LITERATURES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00397709.2023.2200101\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SYMPOSIUM-A QUARTERLY JOURNAL IN MODERN LITERATURES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00397709.2023.2200101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要从最早的时候起,演员的生活就是一种“逃避现实”或展示,总是在展示。就像今天的闪光人一样,他们既被钦佩又被看不起。如果说演艺界在道德上普遍受到谴责,那么对女性的态度也同样重要。考虑到社会规范几乎只从女性的身体和女性演员的阶级来看,女性应该知道自己的位置并坚持下去。女演员可以自由地看起来、表演、穿着和行为,就像她们的“上级”一样,这对社会和道德秩序构成了威胁,正如当时的新闻来源所证实的那样,这种威胁经常在讲坛上受到谴责。然而,当时和现在一样,一桩涉及社会最高阶层并在国外发生的好丑闻可能会“成就”一个人的职业生涯。相隔一百年在国外“成功”的两个例子是Bernarda Ramírez(1615?-1662)和Petronila Jibaja(1692-1763)。两人出身卑微,都受到国外贵族的钦佩、青睐和保管,都带着名利回到西班牙,直到他们的职业生涯结束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Making It Abroad: Bernarda Ramírez (Naples) and Petronila Jibaja (Lisbon)
Abstract From earliest times, the life of actors or actresses was a sort of “escaparate” or showcase, always on display. Much like today’s gliteratti, they were both admired and looked down upon. If the acting profession was seen as morally reprehensible in general, the attitude toward women was no less critical. Given social norms that saw the female sex almost exclusively in terms of her body and the female actor in terms of her class, women ought to know their place and keep to it. That actresses were free to look, act, dress, and behave like their “betters” represented a threat to social and moral order, a threat as often condemned from the pulpit as confirmed in the news sources of the time. Nevertheless, then as now, a good scandal—one involving the highest levels of society and carried on abroad—could “make” one’s career. Two examples of “making it” abroad—a hundred years apart—are Bernarda Ramírez (1615?–1662) and Petronila Jibaja (1692–1763). Both were of humble origin, both were admired, favored, and kept by aristocrats abroad, and both returned to Spain with fame and fortune that they were able to maintain until their careers ended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Symposium is a quarterly journal of criticism in modern literatures originating in languages other than English. Recent issues include peer-reviewed essays on works by Jorge Luis Borges, Bertolt Brecht, Mikhail Bulgakov, Miguel de Cervantes, Denis Diderot, Fyodor Dostoevsky, Paloma Díaz-Mas, Assia Djebar, Umberto Eco, Franz Kafka, Francis Ponge, and Leonardo Sciascia. Scholars of literature will find research on authors, themes, periods, genres, works, and theory, often through comparative studies. Although primarily in English, some issues include discussions of works in the original language.
期刊最新文献
Mechanisms of Defense and Narrative Authority in Holocaust Fiction: Imagining the Perpetrator in David Grossman’s See Under: Love “The Political Dimension of the Unification-Disintegration Paradox in Mantra (2001) by Rodrigo Fresán” Stolen Limelight: Gender, Display and Displacement in Modern Fiction in French Felipe Valencia. The Melancholy Void: Lyric and Masculinity in the Age of Góngora Ilka Kressner, Ana María Mutis, and Elizabeth M. Pettinaroli, editors. Ecofictions, Ecorealities, and Slow Violence in Latin America and the Latinx World
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1