在创新和传统支付系统之间的选择:欧洲趋势的实证分析

S. Camilleri, Christabelle Agius
{"title":"在创新和传统支付系统之间的选择:欧洲趋势的实证分析","authors":"S. Camilleri, Christabelle Agius","doi":"10.24840/2183-0606_009.004_0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current variety of payment methods offers faster settlements and reasonable security, however payment innovations may be met with inertia or resistance.  This study addresses the characteristics which may be associated with the adoption of novel payment systems and salient user trends in this respect.  We investigate whether the reliance on traditional payment methods across European countries is related to socio-economic aspects, and also delve into the payment habits at the individual level.  Results from an econometric model suggest that financial market development and education-related factors are negatively related to the use of traditional payment instruments.  When considering consumer payment habits and awareness about novel facilities, particular differences across generations emerged.  Cash and debit cards are most widely used and it seems that such choices are related to perceived convenience rather than due to aversion towards novel systems.","PeriodicalId":33389,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choosing Between Innovative and Traditional Payment Systems: An Empirical Analysis of European Trends\",\"authors\":\"S. Camilleri, Christabelle Agius\",\"doi\":\"10.24840/2183-0606_009.004_0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current variety of payment methods offers faster settlements and reasonable security, however payment innovations may be met with inertia or resistance.  This study addresses the characteristics which may be associated with the adoption of novel payment systems and salient user trends in this respect.  We investigate whether the reliance on traditional payment methods across European countries is related to socio-economic aspects, and also delve into the payment habits at the individual level.  Results from an econometric model suggest that financial market development and education-related factors are negatively related to the use of traditional payment instruments.  When considering consumer payment habits and awareness about novel facilities, particular differences across generations emerged.  Cash and debit cards are most widely used and it seems that such choices are related to perceived convenience rather than due to aversion towards novel systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Innovation Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Innovation Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_009.004_0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-0606_009.004_0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目前的各种支付方式提供了更快的结算和合理的安全性,但支付创新可能会遇到惯性或阻力。这项研究探讨了可能与采用新型支付系统相关的特征以及这方面的显著用户趋势。我们调查了欧洲国家对传统支付方式的依赖是否与社会经济方面有关,并深入研究了个人层面的支付习惯。计量经济学模型的结果表明,金融市场发展和教育相关因素与传统支付工具的使用呈负相关。当考虑到消费者的支付习惯和对新型设施的认识时,几代人之间出现了特殊的差异。现金卡和借记卡的使用最为广泛,这种选择似乎与感知到的便利性有关,而不是因为对新型系统的厌恶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Choosing Between Innovative and Traditional Payment Systems: An Empirical Analysis of European Trends
The current variety of payment methods offers faster settlements and reasonable security, however payment innovations may be met with inertia or resistance.  This study addresses the characteristics which may be associated with the adoption of novel payment systems and salient user trends in this respect.  We investigate whether the reliance on traditional payment methods across European countries is related to socio-economic aspects, and also delve into the payment habits at the individual level.  Results from an econometric model suggest that financial market development and education-related factors are negatively related to the use of traditional payment instruments.  When considering consumer payment habits and awareness about novel facilities, particular differences across generations emerged.  Cash and debit cards are most widely used and it seems that such choices are related to perceived convenience rather than due to aversion towards novel systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Innovation Management
Journal of Innovation Management Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Conceptual Framework for Workforce Skills for Industry 5.0: Implications for Research, Policy and Practice Open Innovation as Fuel for the Circular Economy: an Analysis of the Italian Context The Role of Innovation Management Tools in Generating Innovation Market Success How Innovation Systems Promote and Hinder Innovations in Healthcare - a Swedish Case Towards a Place-based Approach to Circular Innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1