由于OSAS而行扁桃体切除术的儿童扁桃体明显大于没有OSAS的肥大扁桃体

Q4 Medicine New Medicine Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.25121/newmed.2020.24.3.92
Wiktoria Olińska, J. Urbančič, Piotr Kwast, L. Zawadzka-Głos
{"title":"由于OSAS而行扁桃体切除术的儿童扁桃体明显大于没有OSAS的肥大扁桃体","authors":"Wiktoria Olińska, J. Urbančič, Piotr Kwast, L. Zawadzka-Głos","doi":"10.25121/newmed.2020.24.3.92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Tonsillectomy is one of the most commonly performed procedures in otolaryngology departments. Main indications include tonsil hypertrophy with or without obstructive sleep apnea and recurrent throat infections. The size of tonsils in the group of children qualified for tonsillectomy with obstructive sleep apnea may differ from the size of tonsils in the group without obstructive sleep apnea. Aim. Comparison of morphological features of tonsils in children with and without OSAS undergoing tonsillectomy. Material and methods. Retrospective study conducted from 2011 until 2020, including patients under 18 years old who underwent a total or partial tonsillectomy at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology at the University Medical Center in Ljubljana. Results. Among 824 patients included in the analysis, 96 underwent tonsillectomy due to OSAS and 728 due to tonsil hypertrophy without OSAS. Both groups were comparable in terms of mean age and sex distribution. Tonsil size statistically differed in both groups (p = 0.01), with the prevalence of big tonsils (grade 3 of 4) in the non-OSAS group (in 47% of patients) and large tonsils (grade 4 of 4) in the OSAS group (in 53% of patients). Conclusions. In age and sex-matched groups of children who underwent total or partial tonsillectomy, patients who underwent the procedure due to OSAS had bigger tonsils than those with hypertrophy without OSAS.","PeriodicalId":55698,"journal":{"name":"New Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Children who underwent tonsillectomy due to OSAS have significantly bigger tonsils than those with hypertrophic tonsils without OSAS\",\"authors\":\"Wiktoria Olińska, J. Urbančič, Piotr Kwast, L. Zawadzka-Głos\",\"doi\":\"10.25121/newmed.2020.24.3.92\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Tonsillectomy is one of the most commonly performed procedures in otolaryngology departments. Main indications include tonsil hypertrophy with or without obstructive sleep apnea and recurrent throat infections. The size of tonsils in the group of children qualified for tonsillectomy with obstructive sleep apnea may differ from the size of tonsils in the group without obstructive sleep apnea. Aim. Comparison of morphological features of tonsils in children with and without OSAS undergoing tonsillectomy. Material and methods. Retrospective study conducted from 2011 until 2020, including patients under 18 years old who underwent a total or partial tonsillectomy at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology at the University Medical Center in Ljubljana. Results. Among 824 patients included in the analysis, 96 underwent tonsillectomy due to OSAS and 728 due to tonsil hypertrophy without OSAS. Both groups were comparable in terms of mean age and sex distribution. Tonsil size statistically differed in both groups (p = 0.01), with the prevalence of big tonsils (grade 3 of 4) in the non-OSAS group (in 47% of patients) and large tonsils (grade 4 of 4) in the OSAS group (in 53% of patients). Conclusions. In age and sex-matched groups of children who underwent total or partial tonsillectomy, patients who underwent the procedure due to OSAS had bigger tonsils than those with hypertrophy without OSAS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25121/newmed.2020.24.3.92\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25121/newmed.2020.24.3.92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。扁桃体切除术是耳鼻喉科最常见的手术之一。主要适应症包括扁桃体肥大伴或不伴阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停和反复咽部感染。患有阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的儿童扁桃体切除术组的扁桃体大小可能与未患有阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的儿童组的扁桃体大小不同。的目标。行扁桃体切除术的osaas患儿与非osaas患儿扁桃体形态特征比较。材料和方法。回顾性研究于2011年至2020年进行,包括在卢布尔雅那大学医学中心耳鼻喉科接受全部或部分扁桃体切除术的18岁以下患者。结果。在纳入分析的824例患者中,96例因OSAS而行扁桃体切除术,728例因扁桃体肥大而无OSAS。两组在平均年龄和性别分布方面具有可比性。两组患者扁桃体大小差异有统计学意义(p = 0.01),非OSAS组大扁桃体(3 / 4级)患病率为47%,OSAS组大扁桃体(4 / 4级)患病率为53%。结论。在年龄和性别匹配的接受全部或部分扁桃体切除术的儿童中,由于OSAS而接受手术的患者的扁桃体比没有OSAS的肥大患者的扁桃体更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Children who underwent tonsillectomy due to OSAS have significantly bigger tonsils than those with hypertrophic tonsils without OSAS
Introduction. Tonsillectomy is one of the most commonly performed procedures in otolaryngology departments. Main indications include tonsil hypertrophy with or without obstructive sleep apnea and recurrent throat infections. The size of tonsils in the group of children qualified for tonsillectomy with obstructive sleep apnea may differ from the size of tonsils in the group without obstructive sleep apnea. Aim. Comparison of morphological features of tonsils in children with and without OSAS undergoing tonsillectomy. Material and methods. Retrospective study conducted from 2011 until 2020, including patients under 18 years old who underwent a total or partial tonsillectomy at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology at the University Medical Center in Ljubljana. Results. Among 824 patients included in the analysis, 96 underwent tonsillectomy due to OSAS and 728 due to tonsil hypertrophy without OSAS. Both groups were comparable in terms of mean age and sex distribution. Tonsil size statistically differed in both groups (p = 0.01), with the prevalence of big tonsils (grade 3 of 4) in the non-OSAS group (in 47% of patients) and large tonsils (grade 4 of 4) in the OSAS group (in 53% of patients). Conclusions. In age and sex-matched groups of children who underwent total or partial tonsillectomy, patients who underwent the procedure due to OSAS had bigger tonsils than those with hypertrophy without OSAS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Medicine
New Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: - New Medicine is indexed in Index Copernicus (IC value 6.60) and registered in Embase/Excerpta Medica. - It is published in English and some issues in other languages. - New Medicine covers a broad spectrum of disciplines. - New Medicine is sent to national and medical libraries in several countries all over the world and to some libraries and institutions in Poland. It is also present on medical conferences. - New Medicine is published under the patronage of Polish Society of Health Education.
期刊最新文献
Dental caries in primary teeth during early childhood in the Warsaw agglomeration Mediastinal emphysema as a complication of posterior pharyngeal wall injury – a case report Abscess and hematoma of the septum – old diagnosis, contemporary treatment options Caries distribution pattern in primary dentition in children in early childhood from the Warsaw agglomeration The innovative laryngological cannula facilitates the precise collection of highly diagnostic material from the nose and sinuses in order to improve the diagnostic and therapeutic process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1