用民族志了解政策改革如何影响一所社区学院的转学过程

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Berkeley Review of Education Pub Date : 2018-06-10 DOI:10.5070/b8bre7229718
Eric R. Felix
{"title":"用民族志了解政策改革如何影响一所社区学院的转学过程","authors":"Eric R. Felix","doi":"10.5070/b8bre7229718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Felix, Eric R. | Abstract: A critical function of community college is providing students with pathways to a bachelor’s degree through transfer. Although students hold high aspirations of transferring, their rates of success are extremely low. In California, policymakers have used legislation as a primary mechanism of addressing transfer inefficiencies in the state’s tiered higher education system. This article explores the ways that recent state-level reform policy SB-1440 (Student Transfer Achievement Reform Act, 2010)—intended to streamline the transfer process through Associate Degrees for Transfer—affected existing practices, practitioners, and transfer-seeking students at one community college. Employing an ethnographic approach, this study highlights the interaction between the existing context and policy mandates that reshape campus transfer culture. The findings indicate that, although the transfer policy reform was intended to improve transfer pathways for students, there was a disconnect between students’ aspirations and the state higher education institutions accepting these Associate Degrees for Transfer. Additionally, there was a misalignment between campus practitioners’ efforts to implement transfer reform and students’ awareness of improvements. To compensate for this disconnect, students formed a student counter-space. These findings suggest the need for transformative higher education policy, built upon concepts of transfer infrastructure, to improve college opportunities and outcomes for students across the state.","PeriodicalId":42751,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley Review of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5070/b8bre7229718","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Ethnography to Understand How Policy Reform Influences the Transfer Process at One Community College\",\"authors\":\"Eric R. Felix\",\"doi\":\"10.5070/b8bre7229718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Author(s): Felix, Eric R. | Abstract: A critical function of community college is providing students with pathways to a bachelor’s degree through transfer. Although students hold high aspirations of transferring, their rates of success are extremely low. In California, policymakers have used legislation as a primary mechanism of addressing transfer inefficiencies in the state’s tiered higher education system. This article explores the ways that recent state-level reform policy SB-1440 (Student Transfer Achievement Reform Act, 2010)—intended to streamline the transfer process through Associate Degrees for Transfer—affected existing practices, practitioners, and transfer-seeking students at one community college. Employing an ethnographic approach, this study highlights the interaction between the existing context and policy mandates that reshape campus transfer culture. The findings indicate that, although the transfer policy reform was intended to improve transfer pathways for students, there was a disconnect between students’ aspirations and the state higher education institutions accepting these Associate Degrees for Transfer. Additionally, there was a misalignment between campus practitioners’ efforts to implement transfer reform and students’ awareness of improvements. To compensate for this disconnect, students formed a student counter-space. These findings suggest the need for transformative higher education policy, built upon concepts of transfer infrastructure, to improve college opportunities and outcomes for students across the state.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Berkeley Review of Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5070/b8bre7229718\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Berkeley Review of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5070/b8bre7229718\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley Review of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/b8bre7229718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

作者:Felix,Eric R.|摘要:社区大学的一个关键功能是为学生提供通过转学获得学士学位的途径。尽管学生们对转学抱有很高的期望,但他们的成功率却极低。在加利福尼亚州,政策制定者将立法作为解决该州分级高等教育系统中转移效率低下问题的主要机制。本文探讨了最近的州级改革政策SB-1440(《学生转学成绩改革法案》,2010年)——旨在通过转校副学位简化转学过程——对一所社区学院现有实践、从业者和寻求转学的学生的影响。本研究采用人种学方法,强调了重塑校园转移文化的现有背景和政策授权之间的互动。研究结果表明,尽管转学政策改革旨在改善学生的转学途径,但学生的愿望与接受这些转学副学位的州立高等教育机构之间存在脱节。此外,校园从业者实施转学改革的努力与学生的改进意识之间存在不一致。为了弥补这种脱节,学生们形成了一个学生柜台空间。这些发现表明,有必要在转移基础设施的概念基础上制定变革性的高等教育政策,以改善全州学生的大学机会和成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using Ethnography to Understand How Policy Reform Influences the Transfer Process at One Community College
Author(s): Felix, Eric R. | Abstract: A critical function of community college is providing students with pathways to a bachelor’s degree through transfer. Although students hold high aspirations of transferring, their rates of success are extremely low. In California, policymakers have used legislation as a primary mechanism of addressing transfer inefficiencies in the state’s tiered higher education system. This article explores the ways that recent state-level reform policy SB-1440 (Student Transfer Achievement Reform Act, 2010)—intended to streamline the transfer process through Associate Degrees for Transfer—affected existing practices, practitioners, and transfer-seeking students at one community college. Employing an ethnographic approach, this study highlights the interaction between the existing context and policy mandates that reshape campus transfer culture. The findings indicate that, although the transfer policy reform was intended to improve transfer pathways for students, there was a disconnect between students’ aspirations and the state higher education institutions accepting these Associate Degrees for Transfer. Additionally, there was a misalignment between campus practitioners’ efforts to implement transfer reform and students’ awareness of improvements. To compensate for this disconnect, students formed a student counter-space. These findings suggest the need for transformative higher education policy, built upon concepts of transfer infrastructure, to improve college opportunities and outcomes for students across the state.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Berkeley Review of Education
Berkeley Review of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
A tale of two projects: YPAR in and out of school – bounded versus open inquiry A Revised GTCrit Framework: A Broadened Critical Lens for Gifted and Advanced Education Settings Nice to Whom?: How Midwestern Niceness Undermines Educational Equity Racial Control and Student Labor From Youth Activism to Youth-Powered Curriculum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1