一种新的风蚀取样器,称为“Mendeźs捕集器(MT)”。描述及在壤土中的现场性能试验

IF 3.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL Aeolian Research Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.aeolia.2022.100800
Mariano J. Mendez
{"title":"一种新的风蚀取样器,称为“Mendeźs捕集器(MT)”。描述及在壤土中的现场性能试验","authors":"Mariano J. Mendez","doi":"10.1016/j.aeolia.2022.100800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this study was to describe the constructive details of a new collector called Mendeźs Trap (MT) and to compare its performance with the Big Spring Number Eight (BSNE) and Modified Wilson and Cook (MWAC). A detailed description of the MT with dimensions, schemes, and photos is included in the paper. To evaluate the performance of the MT, eleven wind erosion events were measured with MT, BSNE, and MWAC installed at 22.5, 43, 63, 112, and 164 cm height on a loamy sand<span> soil without cover and roughness. The material collected was weighed and divided by the inlet area to obtain the horizontal mass flux (HMF). Results showed that the HMF measured with MT is strongly correlated to the HMF measured with BSNE and MWAC. Relative efficiencies (slope of the regression curve between HMF of different samplers) showed that MT is 31.83% more efficient than BSNE and that MWAC is 81.37% more efficient than MT. Different relative efficiencies were measured at different heights, but no relationships between the relative efficiency and height were found. The average amounts of material collected were the highest at 22.5 cm height (1.74 g for MT) and the lowest at 164 cm height (0.03 for MWAC). At all heights, the amounts of sediments collected were ordered in the sequence MT &gt; BSNE &gt; MWAC. Percentages of samples weighing more than 0.1 g, 0.2 g, 0.3 g, 0.4 g, 0.5 g were ordered in the sequence MT &gt; BSNE &gt; MWA. Field evaluation showed that, the HMF measured with MT, BSNE, and MWAC can be compared, and MT can be used in wind erosion studies. MT collects more amounts of material than MWACs and BSNEs, which is especially important at greater heights where little amounts of material are normally collected. The results of this study must be confirmed in soils of other texture classes and the role of the particle size and wind speed<span> in the efficiency of the MT must be measured in wind tunnel.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":49246,"journal":{"name":"Aeolian Research","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 100800"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new wind erosion sampler called “Mendeźs trap (MT)”. Description and field performance test in a loamy sand soil\",\"authors\":\"Mariano J. Mendez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aeolia.2022.100800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The aim of this study was to describe the constructive details of a new collector called Mendeźs Trap (MT) and to compare its performance with the Big Spring Number Eight (BSNE) and Modified Wilson and Cook (MWAC). A detailed description of the MT with dimensions, schemes, and photos is included in the paper. To evaluate the performance of the MT, eleven wind erosion events were measured with MT, BSNE, and MWAC installed at 22.5, 43, 63, 112, and 164 cm height on a loamy sand<span> soil without cover and roughness. The material collected was weighed and divided by the inlet area to obtain the horizontal mass flux (HMF). Results showed that the HMF measured with MT is strongly correlated to the HMF measured with BSNE and MWAC. Relative efficiencies (slope of the regression curve between HMF of different samplers) showed that MT is 31.83% more efficient than BSNE and that MWAC is 81.37% more efficient than MT. Different relative efficiencies were measured at different heights, but no relationships between the relative efficiency and height were found. The average amounts of material collected were the highest at 22.5 cm height (1.74 g for MT) and the lowest at 164 cm height (0.03 for MWAC). At all heights, the amounts of sediments collected were ordered in the sequence MT &gt; BSNE &gt; MWAC. Percentages of samples weighing more than 0.1 g, 0.2 g, 0.3 g, 0.4 g, 0.5 g were ordered in the sequence MT &gt; BSNE &gt; MWA. Field evaluation showed that, the HMF measured with MT, BSNE, and MWAC can be compared, and MT can be used in wind erosion studies. MT collects more amounts of material than MWACs and BSNEs, which is especially important at greater heights where little amounts of material are normally collected. The results of this study must be confirmed in soils of other texture classes and the role of the particle size and wind speed<span> in the efficiency of the MT must be measured in wind tunnel.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aeolian Research\",\"volume\":\"56 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100800\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aeolian Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875963722000301\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aeolian Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875963722000301","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是描述一种名为Mendeźs捕集器(MT)的新型捕集器的构造细节,并将其与大弹簧8号(BSNE)和改良Wilson and Cook (MWAC)的性能进行比较。文中详细描述了MT的尺寸、方案和照片。为了评估MT的性能,在无覆盖物和粗糙度的壤土上,分别在22.5、43、63、112和164 cm高度安装MT、BSNE和MWAC,测量了11个风蚀事件。对收集的物料进行称重并除以入口面积,得到水平质量通量(HMF)。结果表明,MT测得的HMF与BSNE和MWAC测得的HMF有很强的相关性。相对效率(不同样品HMF之间的回归曲线斜率)显示,MT效率比BSNE高31.83%,MWAC效率比MT高81.37%。不同高度的相对效率不同,但相对效率与高度没有关系。平均采食量在22.5 cm处最高(MT为1.74 g),在164 cm处最低(MWAC为0.03 g)。在所有高度,收集的沉积物量按MT >序列排序;BSNE祝辞MWAC。重量大于0.1 g、0.2 g、0.3 g、0.4 g、0.5 g的样品按MT >顺序排序;BSNE祝辞MWA。野外评价结果表明,MT、BSNE和MWAC测量的HMF值可进行比较,MT可用于风蚀研究。MT比MWACs和BSNEs收集更多的材料,这在通常收集少量材料的较高高度尤为重要。本研究的结果必须在其他质地类型的土壤中得到证实,并且必须在风洞中测量粒径和风速对MT效率的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A new wind erosion sampler called “Mendeźs trap (MT)”. Description and field performance test in a loamy sand soil

The aim of this study was to describe the constructive details of a new collector called Mendeźs Trap (MT) and to compare its performance with the Big Spring Number Eight (BSNE) and Modified Wilson and Cook (MWAC). A detailed description of the MT with dimensions, schemes, and photos is included in the paper. To evaluate the performance of the MT, eleven wind erosion events were measured with MT, BSNE, and MWAC installed at 22.5, 43, 63, 112, and 164 cm height on a loamy sand soil without cover and roughness. The material collected was weighed and divided by the inlet area to obtain the horizontal mass flux (HMF). Results showed that the HMF measured with MT is strongly correlated to the HMF measured with BSNE and MWAC. Relative efficiencies (slope of the regression curve between HMF of different samplers) showed that MT is 31.83% more efficient than BSNE and that MWAC is 81.37% more efficient than MT. Different relative efficiencies were measured at different heights, but no relationships between the relative efficiency and height were found. The average amounts of material collected were the highest at 22.5 cm height (1.74 g for MT) and the lowest at 164 cm height (0.03 for MWAC). At all heights, the amounts of sediments collected were ordered in the sequence MT > BSNE > MWAC. Percentages of samples weighing more than 0.1 g, 0.2 g, 0.3 g, 0.4 g, 0.5 g were ordered in the sequence MT > BSNE > MWA. Field evaluation showed that, the HMF measured with MT, BSNE, and MWAC can be compared, and MT can be used in wind erosion studies. MT collects more amounts of material than MWACs and BSNEs, which is especially important at greater heights where little amounts of material are normally collected. The results of this study must be confirmed in soils of other texture classes and the role of the particle size and wind speed in the efficiency of the MT must be measured in wind tunnel.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aeolian Research
Aeolian Research GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Aeolian Research includes the following topics: • Fundamental Aeolian processes, including sand and dust entrainment, transport and deposition of sediment • Modeling and field studies of Aeolian processes • Instrumentation/measurement in the field and lab • Practical applications including environmental impacts and erosion control • Aeolian landforms, geomorphology and paleoenvironments • Dust-atmosphere/cloud interactions.
期刊最新文献
An evaluation of different approaches for estimating shear velocity in aeolian research studies Aeolian sand cover on a granite peninsula (Hammeren, Bornholm, Baltic Sea) formed in three episodes during the past 11,600 years Speculation on an early Pleistocene origin of the Parker dunes of southwest Arizona, USA Transport and deposition of microplastics and microrubbers during a dust storm (Sarakhs, northeast Iran) Automatic identification of saltating tracks driven by strong wind in high-speed video using multiple statistical quantities of instant particle velocity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1