正义的正义

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVANGELISCHE ETHIK Pub Date : 2021-07-29 DOI:10.14315/zee-2021-650307
M. Wirth
{"title":"正义的正义","authors":"M. Wirth","doi":"10.14315/zee-2021-650307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Triage in medicine reveals problems of justice, since in the choice between two harms, ethical reflection encourages not only to avoid the greater harm but also to tolerate a lesser harm. It is precisely this that renders the justice of triage in question here so tragic, belying the positive semantics of justice. This is exactly what happens in medical triage, which, although it may be deemed fair, leaves one harm uneliminated, even if it is the lesser of the two. Decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic must therefore take measures in order to avoid the need for triage. In this discussion, Protestant criticisms of justice undermine resolute attestations of justice by pointing them towards their mediocre moral structures. As shown problems can be avoided that arise when judgments of justice are evaluated in established ethical deliberation without consideration of their unsavory effects and by overestimating iustitia hominis. © 2021 Guetersloher Verlagshaus. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":41129,"journal":{"name":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVANGELISCHE ETHIK","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Der Rigor der Gerechtigkeit\",\"authors\":\"M. Wirth\",\"doi\":\"10.14315/zee-2021-650307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Triage in medicine reveals problems of justice, since in the choice between two harms, ethical reflection encourages not only to avoid the greater harm but also to tolerate a lesser harm. It is precisely this that renders the justice of triage in question here so tragic, belying the positive semantics of justice. This is exactly what happens in medical triage, which, although it may be deemed fair, leaves one harm uneliminated, even if it is the lesser of the two. Decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic must therefore take measures in order to avoid the need for triage. In this discussion, Protestant criticisms of justice undermine resolute attestations of justice by pointing them towards their mediocre moral structures. As shown problems can be avoided that arise when judgments of justice are evaluated in established ethical deliberation without consideration of their unsavory effects and by overestimating iustitia hominis. © 2021 Guetersloher Verlagshaus. All rights reserved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVANGELISCHE ETHIK\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVANGELISCHE ETHIK\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14315/zee-2021-650307\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVANGELISCHE ETHIK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14315/zee-2021-650307","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医学上的分类揭示了正义的问题,因为在两种伤害之间的选择中,伦理反思不仅鼓励避免更大的伤害,而且鼓励容忍更小的伤害。正是这一点使这里所讨论的分流正义如此悲惨,与正义的积极语义背道而驰。这正是医疗分诊中发生的情况,尽管这可能被认为是公平的,但其中一种伤害是不可消除的,即使是两种伤害中较小的一种。因此,新冠肺炎大流行期间的决策必须采取措施,以避免需要进行分流。在这场讨论中,新教对正义的批评通过将其指向平庸的道德结构,破坏了对正义的坚定证明。正如所示,当在既定的伦理审议中对正义的判断进行评估时,可以避免出现问题,而不考虑其不良影响,也不高估人的本质。©2021 Guetersloher Verlagshaus。保留所有权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Der Rigor der Gerechtigkeit
Triage in medicine reveals problems of justice, since in the choice between two harms, ethical reflection encourages not only to avoid the greater harm but also to tolerate a lesser harm. It is precisely this that renders the justice of triage in question here so tragic, belying the positive semantics of justice. This is exactly what happens in medical triage, which, although it may be deemed fair, leaves one harm uneliminated, even if it is the lesser of the two. Decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic must therefore take measures in order to avoid the need for triage. In this discussion, Protestant criticisms of justice undermine resolute attestations of justice by pointing them towards their mediocre moral structures. As shown problems can be avoided that arise when judgments of justice are evaluated in established ethical deliberation without consideration of their unsavory effects and by overestimating iustitia hominis. © 2021 Guetersloher Verlagshaus. All rights reserved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Moralischer Universalismus im Angesicht der Gewalt Autorinnen und Autoren Martin Honecker Rezensionen Kirchliches Arbeitsrecht auf dem Prüfstand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1