直觉,共和国的辩证纲领及其在巴门尼德和提图斯的实践

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY Plato Journal Pub Date : 2020-08-04 DOI:10.14195/2183-4105_20_10
Álvaro Vallejo Campos
{"title":"直觉,共和国的辩证纲领及其在巴门尼德和提图斯的实践","authors":"Álvaro Vallejo Campos","doi":"10.14195/2183-4105_20_10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the relation between the dialectical program established in Plato’s Republic and the practice of dialectic in other dialogues, such as the Parmenides and the Theaetetus. The author argues against those scholars who have sustained a sharp distinction between an intuitive (not discursive) conception of knowledge and the discursive practices characteristic of Plato’s concept of dialectic. In his view, Plato has been overinterpreted from the modern perspective of the distinction between intuitive and discursive forms of knowledge. As a consequence, this article also examines the relation between the dialectical practices displayed in the Parmenides and the Theaetetus and the anhypothetical condition that Plato attributes to “the principle of everything” in the Republic.","PeriodicalId":53756,"journal":{"name":"Plato Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La intuición, el programa dialéctico de la República y su práctica en el Parménides y el Teeteto\",\"authors\":\"Álvaro Vallejo Campos\",\"doi\":\"10.14195/2183-4105_20_10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the relation between the dialectical program established in Plato’s Republic and the practice of dialectic in other dialogues, such as the Parmenides and the Theaetetus. The author argues against those scholars who have sustained a sharp distinction between an intuitive (not discursive) conception of knowledge and the discursive practices characteristic of Plato’s concept of dialectic. In his view, Plato has been overinterpreted from the modern perspective of the distinction between intuitive and discursive forms of knowledge. As a consequence, this article also examines the relation between the dialectical practices displayed in the Parmenides and the Theaetetus and the anhypothetical condition that Plato attributes to “the principle of everything” in the Republic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plato Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plato Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_20_10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plato Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_20_10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了柏拉图《理想国》中确立的辩证法纲领与其他对话中的辩证法实践之间的关系,如《帕门尼德》和《泰阿泰德》。作者反对那些在直觉(而非话语)的知识概念和柏拉图辩证法概念的话语实践之间保持鲜明区别的学者。在他看来,柏拉图从现代的角度过度解读了知识的直觉形式和话语形式之间的区别。因此,本文还考察了《帕门尼德论》和《泰阿泰德论》中所表现的辩证实践与柏拉图在《理想国》中所赋予的“一切原则”的非假设条件之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
La intuición, el programa dialéctico de la República y su práctica en el Parménides y el Teeteto
This article examines the relation between the dialectical program established in Plato’s Republic and the practice of dialectic in other dialogues, such as the Parmenides and the Theaetetus. The author argues against those scholars who have sustained a sharp distinction between an intuitive (not discursive) conception of knowledge and the discursive practices characteristic of Plato’s concept of dialectic. In his view, Plato has been overinterpreted from the modern perspective of the distinction between intuitive and discursive forms of knowledge. As a consequence, this article also examines the relation between the dialectical practices displayed in the Parmenides and the Theaetetus and the anhypothetical condition that Plato attributes to “the principle of everything” in the Republic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plato Journal
Plato Journal PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
J. K. Larsen, V. V. Haraldsen, and J. Vlasits (eds.), New Perspectives on Platonic Dialectic. A Philosophy of Inquiry, New York - London, Routledge 2022 Choosing and Desire in Plato's Republic 4 Myth, virtue and method in Plato’s Meno Mason Marshall, Reading Plato’s Dialogues to Enhance Learning and Inquiry: Exploring Socrates’ Use of Protreptic for Student Engagement. New York: Routledge F. Benoni; A. Stavru (eds.) (2021). Platone e il governo delle passioni. Studi per Linda Napolitano. Perugia, Aguaplano
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1