{"title":"把能量带回来","authors":"S. Lukes","doi":"10.1177/1468795X211055659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Derrida J (2005) Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences. In Writing and Difference. Translated by A Bass. London and New York: Routledge, pp.351–370. Lukes S (2007) Searle versus Durkheim. In: Tsohatzidis S (ed.) Intentional Acts and Institutional Facts: Essays on John Searle’s Social Ontology. Dordrecht: Springer, pp.191–202. Sawyer RK (2002) Durkheim’s dilemma: Toward a sociology of emergence. Sociological Theory 20(2): 227–247. Schmaus W (1994) Durkheim’s Philosophy of Science and the Sociology of Knowledge: Creating an Intellectual Niche. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Searle JR (2006) Searle versus Durkheim and the waves of thought. Anthropological Theory 6(1): 57–69. Tilly C (ed.) (1981) Useless Durkheim. In: As Sociology Meets History. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp.95–108.","PeriodicalId":44864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Classical Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bringing power back in\",\"authors\":\"S. Lukes\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1468795X211055659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Derrida J (2005) Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences. In Writing and Difference. Translated by A Bass. London and New York: Routledge, pp.351–370. Lukes S (2007) Searle versus Durkheim. In: Tsohatzidis S (ed.) Intentional Acts and Institutional Facts: Essays on John Searle’s Social Ontology. Dordrecht: Springer, pp.191–202. Sawyer RK (2002) Durkheim’s dilemma: Toward a sociology of emergence. Sociological Theory 20(2): 227–247. Schmaus W (1994) Durkheim’s Philosophy of Science and the Sociology of Knowledge: Creating an Intellectual Niche. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Searle JR (2006) Searle versus Durkheim and the waves of thought. Anthropological Theory 6(1): 57–69. Tilly C (ed.) (1981) Useless Durkheim. In: As Sociology Meets History. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp.95–108.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Classical Sociology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Classical Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X211055659\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Classical Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X211055659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Derrida J (2005) Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences. In Writing and Difference. Translated by A Bass. London and New York: Routledge, pp.351–370. Lukes S (2007) Searle versus Durkheim. In: Tsohatzidis S (ed.) Intentional Acts and Institutional Facts: Essays on John Searle’s Social Ontology. Dordrecht: Springer, pp.191–202. Sawyer RK (2002) Durkheim’s dilemma: Toward a sociology of emergence. Sociological Theory 20(2): 227–247. Schmaus W (1994) Durkheim’s Philosophy of Science and the Sociology of Knowledge: Creating an Intellectual Niche. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Searle JR (2006) Searle versus Durkheim and the waves of thought. Anthropological Theory 6(1): 57–69. Tilly C (ed.) (1981) Useless Durkheim. In: As Sociology Meets History. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp.95–108.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Classical Sociology publishes cutting-edge articles that will command general respect within the academic community. The aim of the Journal of Classical Sociology is to demonstrate scholarly excellence in the study of the sociological tradition. The journal elucidates the origins of sociology and also demonstrates how the classical tradition renews the sociological imagination in the present day. The journal is a critical but constructive reflection on the roots and formation of sociology from the Enlightenment to the 21st century. Journal of Classical Sociology promotes discussions of early social theory, such as Hobbesian contract theory, through the 19th- and early 20th- century classics associated with the thought of Comte, Marx, Durkheim, Weber, Simmel, Veblen.