后罗斯:对菲利普·罗斯小说历史化困境的思考

Q2 Arts and Humanities Philip Roth Studies Pub Date : 2019-09-17 DOI:10.5703/philrothstud.15.2.0005
Andy Connolly
{"title":"后罗斯:对菲利普·罗斯小说历史化困境的思考","authors":"Andy Connolly","doi":"10.5703/philrothstud.15.2.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:By looking at how Roth's relevance as a writer of historical fiction has assumed new significance in recent discussions of The Plot Against America (2004) as a novel that helps to shed light on the \"unforeseen\" rise to power of Donald Trump, this discussion offers certain warnings about the abuses of an historicist criticism that seeks to assign polemical value to Roth's work. In so doing, this article examines the concerns dramatized in Exit Ghost (2007) about issues of posthumous legacy and contextual criticism as an avenue for speculating upon the possibilities for reading Roth within an historical light and claims that it is mistaken for readers to think of the author as one who holds fast to particular ideological positions or political loyalties. At the same time, it looks at how Roth's strained sense of loyalty to literary formalism, as articulated in his non-fiction, leaves room for sophisticated strategies of contextual criticism that avoid the kind of didactic moral and political readings that the author had always forsworn.","PeriodicalId":37093,"journal":{"name":"Philip Roth Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Posthumous Roth: Reflections on the Dilemmas of Historicizing Philip Roth's Fiction\",\"authors\":\"Andy Connolly\",\"doi\":\"10.5703/philrothstud.15.2.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:By looking at how Roth's relevance as a writer of historical fiction has assumed new significance in recent discussions of The Plot Against America (2004) as a novel that helps to shed light on the \\\"unforeseen\\\" rise to power of Donald Trump, this discussion offers certain warnings about the abuses of an historicist criticism that seeks to assign polemical value to Roth's work. In so doing, this article examines the concerns dramatized in Exit Ghost (2007) about issues of posthumous legacy and contextual criticism as an avenue for speculating upon the possibilities for reading Roth within an historical light and claims that it is mistaken for readers to think of the author as one who holds fast to particular ideological positions or political loyalties. At the same time, it looks at how Roth's strained sense of loyalty to literary formalism, as articulated in his non-fiction, leaves room for sophisticated strategies of contextual criticism that avoid the kind of didactic moral and political readings that the author had always forsworn.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philip Roth Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philip Roth Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5703/philrothstud.15.2.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philip Roth Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5703/philrothstud.15.2.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:通过观察罗斯作为一名历史小说作家的相关性如何在最近关于《反美阴谋》(2004)的讨论中具有新的意义,这部小说有助于揭示唐纳德·特朗普“不可预见”的权力崛起,本次讨论对历史主义批评的滥用提出了一定的警告,这种批评试图赋予罗斯的作品以争论的价值。在这样做的过程中,本文考察了《退出幽灵》(2007)中对死后遗产问题的戏剧性关注,以及作为从历史角度推测阅读罗斯的可能性的背景批评,并声称读者认为作者是一个坚守特定意识形态立场或政治忠诚的人是错误的。同时,它着眼于罗斯对文学形式主义的紧张忠诚感,正如他在非小说中所表达的那样,如何为复杂的语境批评策略留下空间,以避免作者一直摒弃的那种说教性的道德和政治解读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Posthumous Roth: Reflections on the Dilemmas of Historicizing Philip Roth's Fiction
ABSTRACT:By looking at how Roth's relevance as a writer of historical fiction has assumed new significance in recent discussions of The Plot Against America (2004) as a novel that helps to shed light on the "unforeseen" rise to power of Donald Trump, this discussion offers certain warnings about the abuses of an historicist criticism that seeks to assign polemical value to Roth's work. In so doing, this article examines the concerns dramatized in Exit Ghost (2007) about issues of posthumous legacy and contextual criticism as an avenue for speculating upon the possibilities for reading Roth within an historical light and claims that it is mistaken for readers to think of the author as one who holds fast to particular ideological positions or political loyalties. At the same time, it looks at how Roth's strained sense of loyalty to literary formalism, as articulated in his non-fiction, leaves room for sophisticated strategies of contextual criticism that avoid the kind of didactic moral and political readings that the author had always forsworn.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Philip Roth Studies
Philip Roth Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editors' Note: Traveling with Roth Philip Roth and "My American Gang" In Medias Res Roth and Reputation versus Sex and Empowerment in The Dying Animal Hauntologies of Fiction: Reading Roth at the End of History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1