把思维的规定提升到这种焦虑的、不完整的立场之上——康德的直观理解概念及其在黑格尔的客观思维中的表述

Sandra V. Palermo, N. Lerussi
{"title":"把思维的规定提升到这种焦虑的、不完整的立场之上——康德的直观理解概念及其在黑格尔的客观思维中的表述","authors":"Sandra V. Palermo, N. Lerussi","doi":"10.1080/17570638.2021.1910373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this paper, we show that Kant’s complex concept of an “intuitive understanding” (or in a broader sense “superior understanding”), which operates in his work as a tool for defining the peculiar character of our (human) understanding, is critically absorbed by Hegel’s concept of “objective thought.” By means of this concept, Hegel first rejects the representational (and classificatory) conception of thought that is implied by the Kantian concept of an intuitive understanding and, second, he proposes a way of comprehending thought that allows a new conception of the relationship between the subject and reality.","PeriodicalId":10599,"journal":{"name":"Comparative and Continental Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17570638.2021.1910373","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elevating the Determinations of Thought Above this Anxious, Incomplete Standpoint: On Kant’s Concept of an Intuitive Understanding and its Articulation in Hegel’s Objective Thought\",\"authors\":\"Sandra V. Palermo, N. Lerussi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17570638.2021.1910373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this paper, we show that Kant’s complex concept of an “intuitive understanding” (or in a broader sense “superior understanding”), which operates in his work as a tool for defining the peculiar character of our (human) understanding, is critically absorbed by Hegel’s concept of “objective thought.” By means of this concept, Hegel first rejects the representational (and classificatory) conception of thought that is implied by the Kantian concept of an intuitive understanding and, second, he proposes a way of comprehending thought that allows a new conception of the relationship between the subject and reality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative and Continental Philosophy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17570638.2021.1910373\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative and Continental Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17570638.2021.1910373\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative and Continental Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17570638.2021.1910373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们表明康德的“直观理解”(或更广泛意义上的“卓越理解”)的复杂概念,在他的作品中作为定义我们(人类)理解的独特特征的工具,被黑格尔的“客观思维”概念批判性地吸收了。通过这一概念,黑格尔首先拒绝了康德的直观理解概念所隐含的思维的表征(和分类)概念,其次,他提出了一种理解思维的方法,这种方法允许对主体与现实之间的关系有一个新的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Elevating the Determinations of Thought Above this Anxious, Incomplete Standpoint: On Kant’s Concept of an Intuitive Understanding and its Articulation in Hegel’s Objective Thought
ABSTRACT In this paper, we show that Kant’s complex concept of an “intuitive understanding” (or in a broader sense “superior understanding”), which operates in his work as a tool for defining the peculiar character of our (human) understanding, is critically absorbed by Hegel’s concept of “objective thought.” By means of this concept, Hegel first rejects the representational (and classificatory) conception of thought that is implied by the Kantian concept of an intuitive understanding and, second, he proposes a way of comprehending thought that allows a new conception of the relationship between the subject and reality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
The Nietzschean ‘Will to Power’ and the Bantu Notion of Force: Implications for Cross-Cultural Philosophizing Anxiety, Grief, and Trust in Times of Climate Change: A Phenomenology of Affective Constellations and Future Transformations in and beyond the Anthropocene Beyond the Doubleday Myth Biopolítica y liberación: La noción de vida humana en Agamben y Dussel Zen Pathways: An Introduction to the Philosophy and Practice of Zen Buddhism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1