一个有毒且支离破碎的政治体系会滋生焦虑和创伤后应激障碍

Q4 Medicine Current psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.12788/cp.0393
Henry A. Nasrallah
{"title":"一个有毒且支离破碎的政治体系会滋生焦虑和创伤后应激障碍","authors":"Henry A. Nasrallah","doi":"10.12788/cp.0393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perhaps one of the worst experiences for a child is to witness bitterly adversarial parents (their vital role models) who argue viciously, despise each other, and hurl insults (and even punches) at each other. Such a chronically and emotionally traumatic upbringing can haunt kids well into adulthood, disrupting their hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and triggering anxiety, depression, and even psychosis due to epigenetic changes that ultimately lead to abnormal brain development.3 It often feels that the governance of our country, or the national “political family,” is seriously fractured like a hopelessly dysfunctional family. Could that be negatively impacting the mental health of the citizenry? Having 2 antagonistic political parties expressing visceral hatred and undisguised contempt for each other 24/7 (thanks to the enabling era of cable TV, the internet, and social media) has transformed each party’s fanatic followers from fellow citizens to ideological combatants. In this poisonous societal zeitgeist of bidirectional acrimony and mutual detestation, the opposing parties and their “intellectual militias” label each other as “extremists” or “radicals.” They become completely blind to any redeeming social value in the ideas or principles of their political opponents. They spend enormous time and energy on undermining each other instead of attending to the myriad vital issues involved in the governance of a massive and complex country. Winston Churchill said, “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others that have been tried.”4 The current toxic cloud of intense “hyperpartisanship” is emblematic of the dark Machiavellian side of democracy. But those who lament the current distorted version of democracy should contemplate living in a dictatorship or totalitarian regime, where a despot would execute any dissenter or invade and destroy an adjacent country at a whim. Churchill made that statement in 1947. The internet, social media, and smartphones were science fiction back then. Those technological advances have added fuel to the political process and significantly stoked the flames of hyperpartisanship. It’s now democracy on steroids, where freedom of expression The governance of our country is fractured like a dysfunctional family and could be negatively impacting the mental health of the citizenry Henry A. Nasrallah, MD, DLFAPA Editor-in-Chief","PeriodicalId":10971,"journal":{"name":"Current psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A toxic and fractured political system can breed angst and PTSD\",\"authors\":\"Henry A. Nasrallah\",\"doi\":\"10.12788/cp.0393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Perhaps one of the worst experiences for a child is to witness bitterly adversarial parents (their vital role models) who argue viciously, despise each other, and hurl insults (and even punches) at each other. Such a chronically and emotionally traumatic upbringing can haunt kids well into adulthood, disrupting their hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and triggering anxiety, depression, and even psychosis due to epigenetic changes that ultimately lead to abnormal brain development.3 It often feels that the governance of our country, or the national “political family,” is seriously fractured like a hopelessly dysfunctional family. Could that be negatively impacting the mental health of the citizenry? Having 2 antagonistic political parties expressing visceral hatred and undisguised contempt for each other 24/7 (thanks to the enabling era of cable TV, the internet, and social media) has transformed each party’s fanatic followers from fellow citizens to ideological combatants. In this poisonous societal zeitgeist of bidirectional acrimony and mutual detestation, the opposing parties and their “intellectual militias” label each other as “extremists” or “radicals.” They become completely blind to any redeeming social value in the ideas or principles of their political opponents. They spend enormous time and energy on undermining each other instead of attending to the myriad vital issues involved in the governance of a massive and complex country. Winston Churchill said, “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others that have been tried.”4 The current toxic cloud of intense “hyperpartisanship” is emblematic of the dark Machiavellian side of democracy. But those who lament the current distorted version of democracy should contemplate living in a dictatorship or totalitarian regime, where a despot would execute any dissenter or invade and destroy an adjacent country at a whim. Churchill made that statement in 1947. The internet, social media, and smartphones were science fiction back then. Those technological advances have added fuel to the political process and significantly stoked the flames of hyperpartisanship. It’s now democracy on steroids, where freedom of expression The governance of our country is fractured like a dysfunctional family and could be negatively impacting the mental health of the citizenry Henry A. Nasrallah, MD, DLFAPA Editor-in-Chief\",\"PeriodicalId\":10971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12788/cp.0393\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/cp.0393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

也许对一个孩子来说,最糟糕的经历之一就是目睹敌对的父母(他们的重要榜样)恶狠狠地争吵,鄙视对方,谩骂(甚至拳脚相向)。这种长期的、情感上的创伤性成长会困扰孩子直到成年,扰乱他们的下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴,引发焦虑、抑郁,甚至由于表观遗传变化而导致的精神病,最终导致大脑发育异常它经常觉得,我们国家的治理,或国家的“政治家庭”,像一个无望的功能失调的家庭一样严重破裂。这会对市民的心理健康产生负面影响吗?由于有线电视、互联网和社交媒体的发展,两个敌对的政党全天候表达发自内心的仇恨和毫不掩饰的蔑视,这使得两党的狂热追随者从同胞变成了意识形态上的斗士。在这种双向尖酸刻薄、相互憎恨的有毒社会思潮中,对立的政党和他们的“知识分子民兵”互相给对方贴上“极端分子”或“激进分子”的标签。他们完全看不到政治对手的思想或原则中任何可取的社会价值。他们把大量的时间和精力花在相互破坏上,而不是关注治理一个庞大而复杂的国家所涉及的无数重要问题。温斯顿·丘吉尔说过:“民主是最糟糕的政府形式,除了所有其他被尝试过的形式。”当前强烈的“超党派之争”的毒云象征着民主中马基雅维利主义的阴暗面。但是,那些哀叹当前民主被扭曲的人应该考虑生活在一个独裁或极权政权中,在那里,暴君会随心所欲地处决任何持不同政见者,或者入侵并摧毁邻国。丘吉尔在1947年发表了这一声明。互联网、社交媒体和智能手机在当时都是科幻小说。这些技术进步为政治进程火上浇油,极大地点燃了党派之争的火焰。我们国家的治理就像一个功能失调的家庭一样支离破碎,可能会对公民的心理健康产生负面影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A toxic and fractured political system can breed angst and PTSD
Perhaps one of the worst experiences for a child is to witness bitterly adversarial parents (their vital role models) who argue viciously, despise each other, and hurl insults (and even punches) at each other. Such a chronically and emotionally traumatic upbringing can haunt kids well into adulthood, disrupting their hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and triggering anxiety, depression, and even psychosis due to epigenetic changes that ultimately lead to abnormal brain development.3 It often feels that the governance of our country, or the national “political family,” is seriously fractured like a hopelessly dysfunctional family. Could that be negatively impacting the mental health of the citizenry? Having 2 antagonistic political parties expressing visceral hatred and undisguised contempt for each other 24/7 (thanks to the enabling era of cable TV, the internet, and social media) has transformed each party’s fanatic followers from fellow citizens to ideological combatants. In this poisonous societal zeitgeist of bidirectional acrimony and mutual detestation, the opposing parties and their “intellectual militias” label each other as “extremists” or “radicals.” They become completely blind to any redeeming social value in the ideas or principles of their political opponents. They spend enormous time and energy on undermining each other instead of attending to the myriad vital issues involved in the governance of a massive and complex country. Winston Churchill said, “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others that have been tried.”4 The current toxic cloud of intense “hyperpartisanship” is emblematic of the dark Machiavellian side of democracy. But those who lament the current distorted version of democracy should contemplate living in a dictatorship or totalitarian regime, where a despot would execute any dissenter or invade and destroy an adjacent country at a whim. Churchill made that statement in 1947. The internet, social media, and smartphones were science fiction back then. Those technological advances have added fuel to the political process and significantly stoked the flames of hyperpartisanship. It’s now democracy on steroids, where freedom of expression The governance of our country is fractured like a dysfunctional family and could be negatively impacting the mental health of the citizenry Henry A. Nasrallah, MD, DLFAPA Editor-in-Chief
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current psychiatry
Current psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Worsening mania while receiving low-dose quetiapine: A case report Opioid use disorder in pregnancy: A strategy for using methadone Brick and mortar: Changes in the therapeutic relationship in a postvirtual world More on treating chronic insomnia Shakespeare and suicide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1