哥伦比亚政府实体会计条例是否符合国际公共部门会计准则?对协调的正式衡量

IF 0.1 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Contabilidad y Negocios Pub Date : 2017-04-16 DOI:10.18800/CONTABILIDAD.201702.004
Carlos Orlando Rico Bonilla, Michael Andrés Díaz Jiménez
{"title":"哥伦比亚政府实体会计条例是否符合国际公共部门会计准则?对协调的正式衡量","authors":"Carlos Orlando Rico Bonilla, Michael Andrés Díaz Jiménez","doi":"10.18800/CONTABILIDAD.201702.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper develops a measurement of formal harmonization between the regulatory Framework applicable to Government Entities and the International Public-Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS). For this purpose, the methodology of Euclidean distances is used, a statistical tool that consists of comparing and assigning a numerical score to the divergences and coincidences presented between alternative accounting principles and treatments. It´s concluded that, despite of the advances in the convergence strategy implemented by the Contaduria General de la Nacion (CGN), the entity standard-setting of public sector accounting in Colombia, there are still differences from the normative-technical point of view, which can diminish the potential benefits of a parity process with standards international of general acceptance, especially, the comparability of governmental financial information.","PeriodicalId":40609,"journal":{"name":"Contabilidad y Negocios","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"¿Convergencia de la regulación contable colombiana para las entidades de gobierno con las International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS)? Una medición de la armonización formal\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Orlando Rico Bonilla, Michael Andrés Díaz Jiménez\",\"doi\":\"10.18800/CONTABILIDAD.201702.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper develops a measurement of formal harmonization between the regulatory Framework applicable to Government Entities and the International Public-Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS). For this purpose, the methodology of Euclidean distances is used, a statistical tool that consists of comparing and assigning a numerical score to the divergences and coincidences presented between alternative accounting principles and treatments. It´s concluded that, despite of the advances in the convergence strategy implemented by the Contaduria General de la Nacion (CGN), the entity standard-setting of public sector accounting in Colombia, there are still differences from the normative-technical point of view, which can diminish the potential benefits of a parity process with standards international of general acceptance, especially, the comparability of governmental financial information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contabilidad y Negocios\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contabilidad y Negocios\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18800/CONTABILIDAD.201702.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contabilidad y Negocios","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18800/CONTABILIDAD.201702.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

该文件对适用于政府实体的监管框架与《国际公共部门会计准则》之间的正式协调进行了衡量。为此,使用了欧几里得距离方法,这是一种统计工具,包括对替代会计原则和处理方法之间的差异和一致性进行比较并分配数字分数。得出的结论是,尽管哥伦比亚公共部门会计的实体标准制定机构国家会计委员会(CGN)实施的趋同战略取得了进展,但与规范性技术观点相比仍存在差异,这可能会削弱与普遍接受的国际标准平等进程的潜在好处,特别是,政府财务信息的可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
¿Convergencia de la regulación contable colombiana para las entidades de gobierno con las International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS)? Una medición de la armonización formal
The paper develops a measurement of formal harmonization between the regulatory Framework applicable to Government Entities and the International Public-Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS). For this purpose, the methodology of Euclidean distances is used, a statistical tool that consists of comparing and assigning a numerical score to the divergences and coincidences presented between alternative accounting principles and treatments. It´s concluded that, despite of the advances in the convergence strategy implemented by the Contaduria General de la Nacion (CGN), the entity standard-setting of public sector accounting in Colombia, there are still differences from the normative-technical point of view, which can diminish the potential benefits of a parity process with standards international of general acceptance, especially, the comparability of governmental financial information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contabilidad y Negocios
Contabilidad y Negocios BUSINESS, FINANCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Deserción en la educación superior y salud mental: Estudio bibliométrico Management control: The acquisition cost of equipment and controls in a hospital unit Tratamiento del desarrollo sostenible en la formación de contadores en Brasil Estudio de la regulación contable para pymes en Colombia: Una mirada desde las problemáticas en el contexto latinoamericano Influence of internal controls to risk mitigation: A focus on compliance of accounting information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1