心理旋转测试中的性别差异:一个几何教学的视角

IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educacion Xx1 Pub Date : 2023-06-13 DOI:10.5944/educxx1.33150
I. Ramírez-Uclés, Rafael Ramírez Uclés
{"title":"心理旋转测试中的性别差异:一个几何教学的视角","authors":"I. Ramírez-Uclés, Rafael Ramírez Uclés","doi":"10.5944/educxx1.33150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to reports in the literature, males score higher on certain mental rotation tests and complex problem-solving exercises than females. This study analyzes the types of errors made in the Primary Mental Abilities (PMA) space relations sub-test test by 328 secondary school students (ages 13 to 16), 143 of whom, having exhibited complex mathematical problem-solving abilities, were participating in a mathematical talent enhancement programme. The error types detected are defined in terms of angle of rotation of the object and the presence of symmetries in the items of the test. The findings show significantly higher performance in the more mathematically gifted students. Gender differences are only evidenced in the total score of the test and the number of non-answered items, where boys got higher scores than girls. Moreover, there is no significant interaction between the independent variables gender and complex mathematical problem-solving abilities. The conclusions drawn from those findings introduce nuances in the understanding of the gender difference traditionally identified in visualisation, particularly in connection with geometric properties in mental rotation tests. It is stressed that educational research focuses on other aspects, like emotional or behavioural ones that can impact test execution, like speed or the use of less efficient strategies.","PeriodicalId":46713,"journal":{"name":"Educacion Xx1","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender differences in mental rotation tests: a geometry-teaching perspective\",\"authors\":\"I. Ramírez-Uclés, Rafael Ramírez Uclés\",\"doi\":\"10.5944/educxx1.33150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to reports in the literature, males score higher on certain mental rotation tests and complex problem-solving exercises than females. This study analyzes the types of errors made in the Primary Mental Abilities (PMA) space relations sub-test test by 328 secondary school students (ages 13 to 16), 143 of whom, having exhibited complex mathematical problem-solving abilities, were participating in a mathematical talent enhancement programme. The error types detected are defined in terms of angle of rotation of the object and the presence of symmetries in the items of the test. The findings show significantly higher performance in the more mathematically gifted students. Gender differences are only evidenced in the total score of the test and the number of non-answered items, where boys got higher scores than girls. Moreover, there is no significant interaction between the independent variables gender and complex mathematical problem-solving abilities. The conclusions drawn from those findings introduce nuances in the understanding of the gender difference traditionally identified in visualisation, particularly in connection with geometric properties in mental rotation tests. It is stressed that educational research focuses on other aspects, like emotional or behavioural ones that can impact test execution, like speed or the use of less efficient strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46713,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educacion Xx1\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educacion Xx1\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.33150\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacion Xx1","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.33150","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据文献报道,男性在某些心理旋转测试和复杂的问题解决练习中得分高于女性。本研究以328名13至16岁的中学生为研究对象,分析他们在小学心理能力(PMA)空间关系子测试中的错误类型,其中143名学生在数学天赋提升计划中表现出复杂的数学问题解决能力。检测到的错误类型是根据物体的旋转角度和测试项目中存在的对称性来定义的。研究结果表明,在数学上更有天赋的学生表现得更好。性别差异只体现在考试总分和未回答题的数量上,男生的得分高于女生。此外,自变量性别与复杂数学问题解决能力之间没有显著的交互作用。从这些发现中得出的结论引入了对传统上在可视化中确定的性别差异的理解的细微差别,特别是在心理旋转测试中的几何特性方面。有人强调,教育研究的重点是其他方面,比如情绪或行为方面,这些方面会影响考试的执行,比如速度或使用效率较低的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender differences in mental rotation tests: a geometry-teaching perspective
According to reports in the literature, males score higher on certain mental rotation tests and complex problem-solving exercises than females. This study analyzes the types of errors made in the Primary Mental Abilities (PMA) space relations sub-test test by 328 secondary school students (ages 13 to 16), 143 of whom, having exhibited complex mathematical problem-solving abilities, were participating in a mathematical talent enhancement programme. The error types detected are defined in terms of angle of rotation of the object and the presence of symmetries in the items of the test. The findings show significantly higher performance in the more mathematically gifted students. Gender differences are only evidenced in the total score of the test and the number of non-answered items, where boys got higher scores than girls. Moreover, there is no significant interaction between the independent variables gender and complex mathematical problem-solving abilities. The conclusions drawn from those findings introduce nuances in the understanding of the gender difference traditionally identified in visualisation, particularly in connection with geometric properties in mental rotation tests. It is stressed that educational research focuses on other aspects, like emotional or behavioural ones that can impact test execution, like speed or the use of less efficient strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educacion Xx1
Educacion Xx1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.80%
发文量
55
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊介绍: Educación XX1, revista editada por la Facultad de Educación de la Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, difunde ensayos, investigaciones y experiencias innovadoras enmarcadas en cualquiera de los contextos y ámbitos de intervención educativos. Educación XX1es una publicación científica arbitrada por pares (doble ciego) centrada en temas pedagógicos que contribuyen al avance de la educación. A partir de las últimas tendencuas de la politica educativa y de la producción científica, Educación XX1 centra prioritariamente su objetivo en la publicación de articulos relativos a: La educación superior: tendencias, fundamentos, metodologías, evaluación, gobernanza, etc. Buenas prácticas en intervención educativa en la educación superior. Calidad e innovación en la formación del profesorado.
期刊最新文献
An exploration of institutional and personal barriers to online academic engagement at a Brazilian university El desarrollo de conductas resilientes en la lucha contra el abandono académico universitario Tiempos convulsos para la ética en la ciencia y en el uso de las métricas Flexible and rigid persistence: Relations with passion, vitality, and intention to stay in university teachers Gender differences in mental rotation tests: a geometry-teaching perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1