大学课程选择和启发式和偏差作为决策机制的使用:一项在巴西的研究

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento Pub Date : 2022-04-22 DOI:10.32348/1852.4206.v14.n1.30374
M. Feld, Tiago Wickstrom Alves
{"title":"大学课程选择和启发式和偏差作为决策机制的使用:一项在巴西的研究","authors":"M. Feld, Tiago Wickstrom Alves","doi":"10.32348/1852.4206.v14.n1.30374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The choice of a higher education course is one of the most important decisions individuals make, as it usually directs the choice of career or profession. Therefore, it is a complex decision, and it is thus possible that young individuals rely on heuristics and biases to facilitate the decision-making process. Considering that, we explored whether and how heuristics and biases affected college students’ judgments and decisions regarding courses. We developed a questionnaire and applied it to a sample of students in Brazil, and we analyzed the collected data using CATPCA and additional statistical methods. We found that students suffered from sunk-cost bias, in addition to the anchoring and representativeness heuristics. Additionally, we found no evidence of a framing effect. We conclude that heuristics and biases were relevant factors in students’ judgments and decisions, but they did not dominate them, operating, instead, in conjunction with traditional aspects of analysis and choice.","PeriodicalId":53986,"journal":{"name":"Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"University course choice and the use of heuristics and biases as decision making mechanisms: a study in Brazil\",\"authors\":\"M. Feld, Tiago Wickstrom Alves\",\"doi\":\"10.32348/1852.4206.v14.n1.30374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The choice of a higher education course is one of the most important decisions individuals make, as it usually directs the choice of career or profession. Therefore, it is a complex decision, and it is thus possible that young individuals rely on heuristics and biases to facilitate the decision-making process. Considering that, we explored whether and how heuristics and biases affected college students’ judgments and decisions regarding courses. We developed a questionnaire and applied it to a sample of students in Brazil, and we analyzed the collected data using CATPCA and additional statistical methods. We found that students suffered from sunk-cost bias, in addition to the anchoring and representativeness heuristics. Additionally, we found no evidence of a framing effect. We conclude that heuristics and biases were relevant factors in students’ judgments and decisions, but they did not dominate them, operating, instead, in conjunction with traditional aspects of analysis and choice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32348/1852.4206.v14.n1.30374\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32348/1852.4206.v14.n1.30374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高等教育课程的选择是个人做出的最重要的决定之一,因为它通常指导着职业或专业的选择。因此,这是一个复杂的决定,因此,年轻人有可能依靠启发式和偏见来促进决策过程。考虑到这一点,我们探讨了启发式和偏见是否以及如何影响大学生对课程的判断和决策。我们开发了一份问卷,并将其应用于巴西的学生样本,我们使用CATPCA和其他统计方法分析收集的数据。我们发现除了锚定启发式和代表性启发式外,学生还存在沉没成本偏见。此外,我们没有发现框架效应的证据。我们得出的结论是,启发式和偏见是学生判断和决策的相关因素,但它们并不占主导地位,而是与传统的分析和选择方面相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
University course choice and the use of heuristics and biases as decision making mechanisms: a study in Brazil
The choice of a higher education course is one of the most important decisions individuals make, as it usually directs the choice of career or profession. Therefore, it is a complex decision, and it is thus possible that young individuals rely on heuristics and biases to facilitate the decision-making process. Considering that, we explored whether and how heuristics and biases affected college students’ judgments and decisions regarding courses. We developed a questionnaire and applied it to a sample of students in Brazil, and we analyzed the collected data using CATPCA and additional statistical methods. We found that students suffered from sunk-cost bias, in addition to the anchoring and representativeness heuristics. Additionally, we found no evidence of a framing effect. We conclude that heuristics and biases were relevant factors in students’ judgments and decisions, but they did not dominate them, operating, instead, in conjunction with traditional aspects of analysis and choice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento
Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
Apoyo Social en Mujeres Inmigrantes de Valparaíso, Chile El uso problemático del smartphone y la autoestima: un meta-análisis Funcionamiento familiar, regulación emocional y estrés durante el confinamiento por COVID-19 en adolescentes mexicanos Las relaciones entre Habilidades narrativas y Funciones Ejecutivas en la infancia. Una revisión sistemática. Pósters 13-22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1