再看动词与结构的相互作用

IF 0.8 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Constructions and Frames Pub Date : 2021-12-21 DOI:10.1075/cf.21006.iwa
Seizi Iwata
{"title":"再看动词与结构的相互作用","authors":"Seizi Iwata","doi":"10.1075/cf.21006.iwa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Despite the wealth of literature on English resultatives, there still remain a number of issues that have not been\n squarely addressed. This paper addresses two of them through a case study of resultatives based on wipe. First,\n while the existence of resultatives with objects not selected by verbs is well-known in the literature (e.g., wipe the\n crumbs off the table/*wipe the crumbs), few studies have addressed the issue of exactly which entities may appear as\n non-selected objects. Second, there are resultatives whose form is to be analyzed as a mixture of the verb’s lexically-specified\n syntactic frame and the syntactic frame of resultatives (e.g. wipe the blade clean on his skin coat), but such\n resultatives have been neglected in previous studies.\n In order to find an answer to the first issue, this paper adopts a force-recipient account, according to which the\n post-verbal NP of a resultative is a force-recipient (cf. Croft 1990, 1991, 1998, 2012). It is shown that non-selected objects like crumbs are indeed force-recipients in\n a conceptual scene. As for the second issue, such resultatives can be accommodated by means of a constructional analysis which\n holds that verbs contribute the semantics of the resulting expression, and that argument structure constructions simply enable the\n verb meaning to take its form. Together, these findings indicate that verbs play a far more important role than argument structure\n constructions in effecting the syntax and semantics of the resulting expression.","PeriodicalId":42321,"journal":{"name":"Constructions and Frames","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Another look at the interaction between verbs and constructions\",\"authors\":\"Seizi Iwata\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/cf.21006.iwa\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Despite the wealth of literature on English resultatives, there still remain a number of issues that have not been\\n squarely addressed. This paper addresses two of them through a case study of resultatives based on wipe. First,\\n while the existence of resultatives with objects not selected by verbs is well-known in the literature (e.g., wipe the\\n crumbs off the table/*wipe the crumbs), few studies have addressed the issue of exactly which entities may appear as\\n non-selected objects. Second, there are resultatives whose form is to be analyzed as a mixture of the verb’s lexically-specified\\n syntactic frame and the syntactic frame of resultatives (e.g. wipe the blade clean on his skin coat), but such\\n resultatives have been neglected in previous studies.\\n In order to find an answer to the first issue, this paper adopts a force-recipient account, according to which the\\n post-verbal NP of a resultative is a force-recipient (cf. Croft 1990, 1991, 1998, 2012). It is shown that non-selected objects like crumbs are indeed force-recipients in\\n a conceptual scene. As for the second issue, such resultatives can be accommodated by means of a constructional analysis which\\n holds that verbs contribute the semantics of the resulting expression, and that argument structure constructions simply enable the\\n verb meaning to take its form. Together, these findings indicate that verbs play a far more important role than argument structure\\n constructions in effecting the syntax and semantics of the resulting expression.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Constructions and Frames\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Constructions and Frames\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.21006.iwa\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Constructions and Frames","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.21006.iwa","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管关于英语结果体的文献非常丰富,但仍有许多问题没有得到明确的解决。本文通过一个基于wipe的结果式的案例研究来解决其中的两个问题。首先,虽然在文献中,结果语与非动词选择对象的存在是众所周知的(例如,wipe the crumbs off the table/*wipe the crumbs),但很少有研究解决哪些实体可能作为非选择对象出现的问题。第二,有一种结果式,其形式是动词词汇规定的句法框架和结果式句法框架(如wipe the blade clean on his skin coat)的混合,但这种结果式在以往的研究中被忽略了。为了找到第一个问题的答案,本文采用了力接受者解释,根据该解释,结果句的动后NP是力接受者(cf. Croft 1990, 1991, 1998, 2012)。结果表明,在概念场景中,像面包屑这样的非选择对象确实是力的接受者。至于第二个问题,这样的结果式可以通过结构分析来解决,结构分析认为动词提供了结果表达的语义,而论点结构结构只是使动词的意义具有其形式。综上所述,这些发现表明,在影响最终表达的语法和语义方面,动词比论点结构结构起着更重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Another look at the interaction between verbs and constructions
Despite the wealth of literature on English resultatives, there still remain a number of issues that have not been squarely addressed. This paper addresses two of them through a case study of resultatives based on wipe. First, while the existence of resultatives with objects not selected by verbs is well-known in the literature (e.g., wipe the crumbs off the table/*wipe the crumbs), few studies have addressed the issue of exactly which entities may appear as non-selected objects. Second, there are resultatives whose form is to be analyzed as a mixture of the verb’s lexically-specified syntactic frame and the syntactic frame of resultatives (e.g. wipe the blade clean on his skin coat), but such resultatives have been neglected in previous studies. In order to find an answer to the first issue, this paper adopts a force-recipient account, according to which the post-verbal NP of a resultative is a force-recipient (cf. Croft 1990, 1991, 1998, 2012). It is shown that non-selected objects like crumbs are indeed force-recipients in a conceptual scene. As for the second issue, such resultatives can be accommodated by means of a constructional analysis which holds that verbs contribute the semantics of the resulting expression, and that argument structure constructions simply enable the verb meaning to take its form. Together, these findings indicate that verbs play a far more important role than argument structure constructions in effecting the syntax and semantics of the resulting expression.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Constructions and Frames
Constructions and Frames LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
From data to theory Constructional change and frameelement selection A multilingual approach to the interaction between frames and constructions Frame integration and head-switching Old English V-initial and þa-VS main clauses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1