探究第二语言学习动机的研究现状:综述和可靠性综合荟萃分析

IF 1.4 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Iral-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching Pub Date : 2023-02-03 DOI:10.1515/iral-2022-0115
Vahid Aryadoust, Yu Xuan Natalie Soo, Jiayu Zhai
{"title":"探究第二语言学习动机的研究现状:综述和可靠性综合荟萃分析","authors":"Vahid Aryadoust, Yu Xuan Natalie Soo, Jiayu Zhai","doi":"10.1515/iral-2022-0115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We present a thematic review and analysis of the variables affecting language learning motivation (LLM) (2008–2022). The second-language motivational self-system (L2MSS) model was found to be the most applied construct in measuring LLM. Complex systems theory was also another method gaining prominence in LLM research to explain the interactions between micro- and macro-structures surrounding the learner in influencing motivation. Other factors such as socioeconomic status, dialogism and anagnorisis were also identified as variables relating to LLM. For instance, research on dialogism and dialogue has indicated the role of conversation in shaping identity, motivation, and meaning for learners. However, our review found that much of the focus in LLM research has been on the L2MSS learning or teaching experience, while daily living has been largely neglected. We further conducted a reliability generalization meta-analysis. Our analysis found an average reliability of 0.84 (CI = 0.816–0.856), with 34% of reliability coefficients falling below the lower bound of CI. A meta-regression analysis revealed that 16% of the variance in the reliability coefficients was predicted by the number of items in the instruments. Questionnaires with an internal consistency below the lower bound of 0.816 had an average of 4.14 items, while the rest had an average of 5.71 items. We further found significant publication bias. Based on our findings, we suggest areas for future research in LLM.","PeriodicalId":46778,"journal":{"name":"Iral-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the state of research on motivation in second language learning: a review and a reliability generalization meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Vahid Aryadoust, Yu Xuan Natalie Soo, Jiayu Zhai\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/iral-2022-0115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract We present a thematic review and analysis of the variables affecting language learning motivation (LLM) (2008–2022). The second-language motivational self-system (L2MSS) model was found to be the most applied construct in measuring LLM. Complex systems theory was also another method gaining prominence in LLM research to explain the interactions between micro- and macro-structures surrounding the learner in influencing motivation. Other factors such as socioeconomic status, dialogism and anagnorisis were also identified as variables relating to LLM. For instance, research on dialogism and dialogue has indicated the role of conversation in shaping identity, motivation, and meaning for learners. However, our review found that much of the focus in LLM research has been on the L2MSS learning or teaching experience, while daily living has been largely neglected. We further conducted a reliability generalization meta-analysis. Our analysis found an average reliability of 0.84 (CI = 0.816–0.856), with 34% of reliability coefficients falling below the lower bound of CI. A meta-regression analysis revealed that 16% of the variance in the reliability coefficients was predicted by the number of items in the instruments. Questionnaires with an internal consistency below the lower bound of 0.816 had an average of 4.14 items, while the rest had an average of 5.71 items. We further found significant publication bias. Based on our findings, we suggest areas for future research in LLM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iral-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iral-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2022-0115\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iral-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2022-0115","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要我们对影响语言学习动机(LLM)的变量进行了主题回顾和分析(2008-2012)。第二语言动机自我系统(L2MSS)模型被发现是测量LLM最适用的结构。复杂系统理论也是LLM研究中另一种突出的方法,用来解释围绕学习者的微观和宏观结构在影响动机方面的相互作用。其他因素,如社会经济地位、对话主义和变位也被确定为与LLM相关的变量。例如,对对话和对话的研究表明,对话在塑造学习者的身份、动机和意义方面发挥着作用。然而,我们的综述发现,LLM研究的大部分焦点都集中在L2MSS的学习或教学体验上,而日常生活在很大程度上被忽视了。我们进一步进行了可靠性综合荟萃分析。我们的分析发现,平均可靠性为0.84(CI=0.816–0.856),34%的可靠性系数低于CI的下限。元回归分析显示,16%的可靠性系数方差是由仪器中的项目数量预测的。内部一致性低于下限0.816的问卷平均有4.14个项目,其余问卷平均有5.71个项目。我们进一步发现了显著的出版偏见。根据我们的发现,我们提出了LLM未来研究的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the state of research on motivation in second language learning: a review and a reliability generalization meta-analysis
Abstract We present a thematic review and analysis of the variables affecting language learning motivation (LLM) (2008–2022). The second-language motivational self-system (L2MSS) model was found to be the most applied construct in measuring LLM. Complex systems theory was also another method gaining prominence in LLM research to explain the interactions between micro- and macro-structures surrounding the learner in influencing motivation. Other factors such as socioeconomic status, dialogism and anagnorisis were also identified as variables relating to LLM. For instance, research on dialogism and dialogue has indicated the role of conversation in shaping identity, motivation, and meaning for learners. However, our review found that much of the focus in LLM research has been on the L2MSS learning or teaching experience, while daily living has been largely neglected. We further conducted a reliability generalization meta-analysis. Our analysis found an average reliability of 0.84 (CI = 0.816–0.856), with 34% of reliability coefficients falling below the lower bound of CI. A meta-regression analysis revealed that 16% of the variance in the reliability coefficients was predicted by the number of items in the instruments. Questionnaires with an internal consistency below the lower bound of 0.816 had an average of 4.14 items, while the rest had an average of 5.71 items. We further found significant publication bias. Based on our findings, we suggest areas for future research in LLM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching is devoted to problems of general and applied linguistics in their various forms.
期刊最新文献
The impact of guessing and retrieval strategies for learning phrasal verbs Unpacking the positioning of being “disengaged” and “disrespectful” in class through nexus analysis: an international student’s navigation of institutional and interactional university norms Teacher behaviour and student engagement with L2 writing feedback: a case study Defining competencies for training non-native Korean speaking teachers: a Q methodology approach Discipline-specific attitudinal differences of EMI students towards translanguaging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1